Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 12:30 PM Apr 2013

Guns are Rarely Used to Kill Criminals or Stop Crimes New VPC Analysis Reveals

Washington, DC—“Guns are rarely used to kill criminals or stop crimes” according to the new Violence Policy Center (VPC) report Firearm Justifiable Homicides and Non-Fatal Self-Defense Gun Use (http://www.vpc.org/studies/justifiable.pdf). The report analyzes national data from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program’s Supplementary Homicide Report (SHR) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics' National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS).

VPC Executive Director and study co-author Josh Sugarmann states, “The idea that ordinary citizens need access to extraordinary firepower in order to adequately defend themselves against criminals has become the default argument against a federal assault weapons ban and limits on high-capacity ammunition magazines. This new data exposes the fallacy of such arguments and clearly demonstrates that the frequency with which guns are used in self-defense in the real world has nothing in common with pro-gun assertions that firearms are used millions of times each year to kill criminals or stop crimes. In fact, a gun is far more likely to be stolen than used in self-defense.”

<...>

Firearm Justifiable Homicides by Private Citizens Occur Rarely

In 2010, across the nation there were only 230 justifiable homicides involving a private citizen using a firearm reported to the FBI. That same year, there were 8,275 criminal gun homicides.
Using these numbers, in 2010, for every justifiable homicide in the United States involving a gun, guns were used in 36 criminal homicides. This ratio does not take into account the thousands of lives ended in gun suicides (19,392) or unintentional shootings (606) that year.

http://www.vpc.org/press/1304self.htm

48 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Guns are Rarely Used to Kill Criminals or Stop Crimes New VPC Analysis Reveals (Original Post) Cali_Democrat Apr 2013 OP
"Extraordinary firepower" is in the eye of the beholder. Common Sense Party Apr 2013 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author Common Sense Party Apr 2013 #5
If you need 19 round then you bloody well need to learn to shoot straight. /nt TheMadMonk Apr 2013 #8
Tell that to every police officer in the country. AtheistCrusader Apr 2013 #9
Why did I see Boston PD ... Straw Man Apr 2013 #12
Well your name certainly says all that needs to be said. TheMadMonk Apr 2013 #14
So ... Straw Man Apr 2013 #15
Actually I'm from one of the "colonies" and I bloody well blame my "Motherland"... TheMadMonk Apr 2013 #25
Linguistics. Straw Man Apr 2013 #26
"extra-ordinary crime" getting worse? hack89 Apr 2013 #20
And the UK's murder rate has doubled. krispos42 Apr 2013 #41
Actually violent crime is down to levels last seen in the late 1960s. ... spin Apr 2013 #29
Just lovin' these names. Virtually all of that reduction in crime rates... TheMadMonk Apr 2013 #33
There are far too many factors in the crime equation to say for sure why the crime ... spin Apr 2013 #37
Whatever the reasons for the drop in crime, the reduction came as... Eleanors38 Apr 2013 #38
I think it's because of liberal victories in the '70s. krispos42 Apr 2013 #42
Yes, because real life is like a Jason Bourne movie. Common Sense Party Apr 2013 #23
How did they collect data rrneck Apr 2013 #2
They're rarely used to kill *anyone*, given the # of guns vs. the # of gun deaths. friendly_iconoclast Apr 2013 #3
"Firearms justifiable homicides" DemDealer Apr 2013 #4
... Cali_Democrat Apr 2013 #6
1-54-000-01-8C-00725 gejohnston Apr 2013 #7
If Congress would allow the CDC to collect data on gun deaths and injuries Patiod Apr 2013 #10
actually, they can and they do gejohnston Apr 2013 #11
No one's stopping them. You can also find data on Eleanors38 Apr 2013 #39
It's about 5%, really. krispos42 Apr 2013 #44
There's nothing stopping the VPC from commissioning their own study. krispos42 Apr 2013 #43
Bloomberg prefers to use his money to threaten Democratic officeholders. friendly_iconoclast Apr 2013 #46
Even if we accept NCVS as accurate sarisataka Apr 2013 #13
And now stack your successful non-lethal defensive uses of guns up against... TheMadMonk Apr 2013 #18
that is about 8-20 percent gejohnston Apr 2013 #19
So if I count the numbers correctly, 10k defensive uses vs 100-250k offensive. TheMadMonk Apr 2013 #32
you count them incorrect gejohnston Apr 2013 #34
YOUR 8-10% applied to the FBI's 1.24 million total violent crimes. TheMadMonk Apr 2013 #35
wrong count gejohnston Apr 2013 #36
I get London sarisataka Apr 2013 #24
VPC... ileus Apr 2013 #16
Only counting justifiable homicides as defensive usages? Lizzie Poppet Apr 2013 #17
The ability to communicate an idea... discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2013 #21
Looking at those numbers. GreenStormCloud Apr 2013 #22
you forgot an important factor gejohnston Apr 2013 #27
Bomb suicides? rdharma Apr 2013 #28
Where have I mentioned bomb suicides? GreenStormCloud Apr 2013 #30
The vpc? Seriously? beevul Apr 2013 #31
VPC. I keep thinking venereal disease. Eleanors38 Apr 2013 #40
guncontrol nowt, ccw nowt jimmy the one Apr 2013 #45
Ok, everyone. The VPC has challenged us to actually kill people now. AtheistCrusader Apr 2013 #47
There seems to be a lot of actual cases of defensive gun use consolidated here: Howzit May 2013 #48

Common Sense Party

(14,139 posts)
1. "Extraordinary firepower" is in the eye of the beholder.
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 12:39 PM
Apr 2013

I personally do not feel that a 19-round 9 mm is anything extraordinary. And I hope to hell I never have to use it ever. But if I ever do, I hope to hell I have it, and screw the VPC if they think they know better than I.

Response to Common Sense Party (Reply #1)

Straw Man

(6,613 posts)
12. Why did I see Boston PD ...
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 01:25 PM
Apr 2013

... swarming all over Watertown with 30-round mags in their ARs? They were only after one man.

 

TheMadMonk

(6,187 posts)
14. Well your name certainly says all that needs to be said.
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 02:22 PM
Apr 2013

Because, with the able assistance of the NRA and people like you, you've created a national Rambo complex.

You think the only possible answer to violence is more violence. Um how did that work out for you in SE-Asia (Pick your conflict and nation)? How's it working out in Iraq and Afghanistan?

How's it bloody working in America?

You've militarised your police to the point where, they're more heavily outfitted than the actual armed forces of many nations, and whilst that might have had some inhibitory effect on ordinary crime, extra-ordinary crime just gets worse and worse.

Straw Man

(6,613 posts)
15. So ...
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 02:39 PM
Apr 2013

... are you saying I didn't see the Boston PD with thirty-round magazines in their ARs? Because then it would be a straw man.

I'll take exception to your saying that "I" militarized the police. I assume by your diction and spelling that you're from the British Isles -- am I correct? If so, you have no right to be lecturing anyone on military adventurism in Iraq and Afghanistan after what "you" did there in the 19th and 20th centuries. It was a bad idea then, and it's a bad idea now.

"Extra-ordinary crime"? What, pray tell, is that, and how is it getting "worse and worse"?

 

TheMadMonk

(6,187 posts)
25. Actually I'm from one of the "colonies" and I bloody well blame my "Motherland"...
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 03:24 PM
Apr 2013

... along with the rest of Europe for creating the situation which America has been trying to exploit to it's own benefit, ever since Europe developed a conscience and renounced colonialism. Europe gave up it's colonies. The USA has been interfereing in the governance of most of them ever since.



Oh, and I note with some interest you (singular) managed to correctly (in a lingusitic, if not factual sense) use the collective "you" (as in "your nation&quot in your criticism of me.


Oh I don't know. Minor little matters that might have escaped your attention. Insignificant things like Sandy Hook and the Aurora Movie theatre. Gabby Giffords, and Dr Tiller. Kids who think the sollution to problems at school is to bring a gun and start shooting.

Straw Man

(6,613 posts)
26. Linguistics.
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 03:34 PM
Apr 2013
Oh, and I note with some interest you (singular) managed to correctly (in a lingusitic, if not factual sense) use the collective "you" (as in "your nation&quot in your criticism of me.

Here's the thing: when you begin your address with "people like you" and "you think," you're clearly conflating the individual and the collective. I reject your conflation, thank "you" very much.

Actually I'm from one of the "colonies" and I bloody well blame my "Motherland"...

... along with the rest of Europe for creating the situation which America has been trying to exploit to it's own benefit, ever since Europe developed a conscience and renounced colonialism.

I see -- Europe renounced colonialism because it "developed a conscience." And here I thought it was because a Pyrrhic victory in a little thing called the Second World War made it impossible for the Motherland to maintain its dominance over the colonies. It was conscience after all -- what a beautiful little morality tale!

Oh I don't know. Minor little matters that might have escaped your attention. Insignificant things like Sandy Hook and the Aurora Movie theatre. Gabby Giffords, and Dr Tiller. Kids who think the sollution to problems at school is to bring a gun and start shooting.

I see. So crimes have to be bizarre before they catch your attention. Yet murder rates have fallen drastically in recent decades.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
20. "extra-ordinary crime" getting worse?
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 03:07 PM
Apr 2013

don't think so - we have cut our murder rate in half over the past 30 years. You have go back 50 years to find a lower murder or violent crime rate.

krispos42

(49,445 posts)
41. And the UK's murder rate has doubled.
Fri Apr 26, 2013, 10:44 PM
Apr 2013

It's still better that ours, but the ratio went from about 11:1 to about 3:1.

Our non-gun homicide rate is about as high at the UK's total homicide rate.

spin

(17,493 posts)
29. Actually violent crime is down to levels last seen in the late 1960s. ...
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 04:42 PM
Apr 2013
Crime Drops to All-Time Low
JUN 12, 2012 02:30 PM ET // BY SHEILA M. ELDRED

Kids today may not be running around the neighborhood without fear like Beaver Cleaver, but the country is in the midst of low levels of crime not seen in decades, according to a report released this week by the FBI.

Violent crime, which has been falling for five years, decreased 4 percent in 2011, according to the Preliminary Annual Uniform Crime Report. Murders are at the lowest point in 40 years. Violent crime, according to the FBI, includes murder, rape, robbery and assault.

Property crime, which has been in a decline for nine years, also continued to drop, albeit by 0.8 percent, notes Reuters. The peak of violent crime and property crime came in the early '90s. The 2011 report represents a 30.6 drop in property crime since 1991, and a 38 percent drop in violent crime since 1992
http://news.discovery.com/human/violent-crime-statistics-120612.htm


I would say that our nation is doing quite well in our efforts to reduce crime. Of course we can do better.

Much of the violent crime in our nation is due to our long lost War on Drugs. A high percentage of gun violence is the result of drug gangs fighting over turf in cities like Chicago.





 

TheMadMonk

(6,187 posts)
33. Just lovin' these names. Virtually all of that reduction in crime rates...
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 10:57 PM
Apr 2013

...can be linked to population demographics.

Basically fewer young bloods = less machismo.

spin

(17,493 posts)
37. There are far too many factors in the crime equation to say for sure why the crime ...
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 11:34 PM
Apr 2013

rate has fallen dramatically. It could be better policing, it might be more cameras on the street, it might be a change in the drug of choice used in the drug culture.

It could even be the fact the sale of firearms has skyrocketed in recent years and "shall issue" concealed carry has been implemented in forty states.

In reality the drop in crime is due to a number of factors.

 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
38. Whatever the reasons for the drop in crime, the reduction came as...
Tue Apr 23, 2013, 10:29 AM
Apr 2013

American civilian firearm ownership soared.

So much for "more guns = more crime."

krispos42

(49,445 posts)
42. I think it's because of liberal victories in the '70s.
Fri Apr 26, 2013, 10:53 PM
Apr 2013

I posted the following this morning in another thread.






[div class=excerpt style=background:#AFEEEE]The NYC crime rate began to plunge at the same time the other urban centers, as well as the overall crime rates, plunged. Starting in about 1990. In about 1994, federal funding put about 50,000 more cops on the streel, and NYC Mayor Dinkins (spelling?) had put in a major program to expand the NYPD, which came to fruition under Mayor Nine Eleven.



Our common liberal values caused the crime rate to plunge nationwide. Not gun-control laws, but environmental and woman's-rights laws.

In the early 70's, fuel-efficiency standards and automotive pollution limits went into effect; catalytic converters became standard equipment. Because of the converters, leaded gas became obsolescent almost immediately. The US switched over to unleaded gasoline, and within a short period of time the air being breathed by children and pregnant women was pretty much free of lead.






Lead, as you know, causes brain damage that increases anti-social behavior and a laundry-list of other developmental problems.

Also that the same time, abortion was legalized, and only a few years before hormonal birth control had become widespread. Women could now control when then gave birth, resulting in fewer instances of children being born into situations where they were more likely to become violent criminals.

So, with birth control widespread and airborne lead sharply diminished, the generation born in the early-to-mid 70's (my generation) came to about age 15 (15 to 24 are the prime violence-crime-committing years of a criminal's life) with much less of a tendency to be violent criminals.

And the crime rate plunged in half in a decade.





The opposite is true as well. In the post-WW2 era, the population exploded, as did the highway system and the number of cars on the road. Kids born in from, say '47 to '60, were breathing in lots of lead as the American car culture spread in lockstep with the expansion of the middle class and suburbia. 15 years later, say '62 to '75, you can see the violent crime rate start to climb. It more than doubled, actually, as the Baby Boomers hit adulthood.


None of this had to do with guns or magazines or protruding pistol grips or anything... it had to do in huge part with the tendency of the most violent-prone segment of the population (people age 15-24) to commit violence.


Now, of course there were other things that affect the rate as well... the War on Drugs, Prohibition, the economy, but again, none of that happens to do with hardware or Mayor Bloomberg, the Wall Street mayor.


There is probably a correlation between the percentage of the population between the ages of 15-24 and the violent crime rate. But the leaded-gasoline pollution make the population as a whole more violent, which means there is a multiplier effect from that.

Reproductive choice also adds to that, in that a larger percentage of the population between the ages of 15-24 will be born in situations where they will fall into gangs or other criminal lifestyles.

Common Sense Party

(14,139 posts)
23. Yes, because real life is like a Jason Bourne movie.
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 03:23 PM
Apr 2013

One bullet always takes the bad guy down, and everyone is a perfect shot, even in bad light and in motion.

You bloody well need to stop confusing fiction with reality.

And you can bloody well stop dictating to me what I can and cannot use to defend my home.

rrneck

(17,671 posts)
2. How did they collect data
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 12:39 PM
Apr 2013

on criminals who decided not to initiate an assault because he thought he might get shot?

 

friendly_iconoclast

(15,333 posts)
3. They're rarely used to kill *anyone*, given the # of guns vs. the # of gun deaths.
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 12:41 PM
Apr 2013

Then again, the VPC and their ilk would prefer that you not think about that too much...

 

DemDealer

(25 posts)
4. "Firearms justifiable homicides"
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 12:41 PM
Apr 2013

accounts for only around 2%, IIRC, of estimated defensive gun uses. The remaining 98% see the criminal flee when the weapon is threatened (which is a GOOD THING, since it means that nobody died).

The VPC is very well known for using that sort of "fill in the blanks" omissive propaganda. Please don't use them as a source.

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
7. 1-54-000-01-8C-00725
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 12:52 PM
Apr 2013

the 01 in the fourth set indicates type one license, which is a dealer. Take the number to a gun store or ATF office and have them look up address of that FFL.

What I find interesting is that they are re releasing something that has been debunked years ago.
The number in the UCR is correct as it stands, but does not take in account
the number determined to be justifiable by a court at a later date
the number of attackers wounded but not killed
number of attackers simply changing their minds when faced with a gun

“While a large body of research has considered the effects of firearms on injury, crime, and suicide, far less attention has been devoted to understanding their defensive and deterrent effects,” concluded an in-depth 2005 National Research Council study of the state of firearms and violence data.

The data that does exist varies widely. According to Bureau of Justice Statistics numbers, each year between 1987 and 1992 about 62,200 victims of violent crimes used guns to defend themselves, while another 20,000 annually used guns to protect property. According to the National Self-Defense Survey conducted by criminology professor Gary Kleck of Florida State University in 1993, Americans used guns 2.3 million times a year to defend themselves between 1988 and 1993.

That’s a pretty big spread. As a 2012 Congressional Research Service report on gun issues points out, law enforcement agencies do not collect self-defense information as a matter of course, and the available research thus depends on limited numbers of surveys and other self-reported information.

“While a large body of research has considered the effects of firearms on injury, crime, and suicide, far less attention has been devoted to understanding their defensive and deterrent effects,” concluded an in-depth 2005 National Research Council study of the state of firearms and violence data.
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/DC-Decoder/2013/0130/Gun-control-101-Do-Americans-often-use-firearms-in-self-defense

http://www.justfacts.com/guncontrol.asp




Patiod

(11,816 posts)
10. If Congress would allow the CDC to collect data on gun deaths and injuries
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 01:11 PM
Apr 2013

there might be less debate over the veracity of the statistics. But the gun-fuckers won't allow it.

 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
39. No one's stopping them. You can also find data on
Tue Apr 23, 2013, 10:39 AM
Apr 2013

What kind of weapon is used in homicides, and how often it used. For example, do you know that -3% of homicides are caused by rifles? And that the so-called "assault weaoin" is just one type of weapon in this category?

krispos42

(49,445 posts)
44. It's about 5%, really.
Fri Apr 26, 2013, 11:03 PM
Apr 2013

I looked at the numbers a few weeks ago during a discussion.

(I KNOW!!! Shocking, right???)

Of the homicides where the weapon was a gun AND the type of gun could be identified, rifles and shotguns were at about 5% each. The other 90% were handguns.

Something like a quarter or a third of gun-related deaths are of "type unknown", so I'm assuming it's cases where the bullet is unrecovered, or maybe they were .22 LR and they couldn't tell if it was a rifle or a handgun.

krispos42

(49,445 posts)
43. There's nothing stopping the VPC from commissioning their own study.
Fri Apr 26, 2013, 10:57 PM
Apr 2013

Or Mayor Bloomburg, for that matter... he's loaded and there are plenty of first-class research universities and such in his jurisdiction.

I'd be curious to see why this hasn't been done. I would assume it a funding issue; nobody has to get politically involved or organized or donate to NOT own a gun.

 

friendly_iconoclast

(15,333 posts)
46. Bloomberg prefers to use his money to threaten Democratic officeholders.
Sun Apr 28, 2013, 06:13 PM
Apr 2013

Because he's 'progressive' or something like that...

sarisataka

(18,222 posts)
13. Even if we accept NCVS as accurate
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 01:39 PM
Apr 2013

-see below for why it should be viewed as less than complete-

There are several things we can glean:
-counting bodies, as VPC likes to do; no contest. There are far more criminal homicides than justifiable.

-counting potential bodies, which VPC typically ignores; over the five years- criminal homicide 45,328(Table 2), DGU 338,700 (Page 8). That is a ratio of 7.47/1 DGU to criminal homicide. While it is impossible to estimate how many cases DGU prevented criminal homicide the relationship of 13% (45,328/338,700) implies that criminal homicide could double without stretching credibility

-the report only gives suicides and accidental deaths for one year (2010) totaling 19,998. If this is assumed typical, we extrapolate a five year total of 99,990. Adding that total to criminal homicide is a total of 145,318. Compared to DGU the ratio drops to 2.33/1 DGU/death, non-justifiable homicide. The relationship of 42.9% makes it unlikely that if DGU=0 this total would significantly rise. The decrease in suicide would be largely offset by increases in criminal homicide. Accidental gun deaths would factor in, but are essentially negligible compared to the other numbers

-The oft repeated meme of white racist gun owner looking for a chance to kill is blown out of the water by the VPC stats.

Table Seven: Race of Shooter in Justifiable Homicides by Firearm, 2006–2010
White 53.1%
Black 40.8%

Table Nine: Race of Shooter and Person Killed, Justifiable Homicides by Firearm, 2006–2010
Shooter Person Killed
White White 65.1%
Black 32.7%

Black White 7.2%
Black 92.2%

There is a far stronger correlation in justifiable shootings to the same race than other. The only exception is in the case of Asian shooters, black accounts for 61.8%; this is partially explained by the relatively few cases of justifiable homicide by Asians 34 of 1006 cases.

Now to the NCVS numbers. Their total in 1993 was 103,000 DGUs, now increased to 338,700. This tripling is quite surprising in light of the decrease in crime overall in the last twenty years and indications of less individuals owning guns. These factors would be expected to lead to a lower number of DGUs.

In 1993, the year of Kleck's 2.5 million estimate, there were thirteen other surveys that had estimated DGUs from the high 700k range to over three million. Out of fourteen surveys only one, the NCVS, stands out as drastically different than similar studies.
http://www.guncite.com/kleckandgertztable1.html

 

TheMadMonk

(6,187 posts)
18. And now stack your successful non-lethal defensive uses of guns up against...
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 02:46 PM
Apr 2013

...the number of times guns have been used just as non-lethally to OFENSIVELY intimidate victims into compliance with a criminal's wishes. You know, minor little matters like rape and armed robbery.

London to a housebrick you come up shorter than Garry Coleman.

 

TheMadMonk

(6,187 posts)
32. So if I count the numbers correctly, 10k defensive uses vs 100-250k offensive.
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 10:48 PM
Apr 2013

230 x 50 = 10k more or less.
8%-20% of 1.25 million viloent crimes (est.) = 100k - 250k.

Keep digging.

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
34. you count them incorrect
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 11:05 PM
Apr 2013

The DoJ puts it closer to 62K while criminologists have done studies that put it in the 1-3 million range.
Of course, that is assuming the criminal would have blew the whole thing off for lack of a gun, which is very unlikely.

Keep digging.

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
36. wrong count
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 11:18 PM
Apr 2013

but you knew that since I didn't mention the total violent crimes. I mentioned defensive uses.

Do you prefer a shovel or post hole digger? Backhoe perhaps?

sarisataka

(18,222 posts)
24. I get London
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 03:23 PM
Apr 2013

short like Mel Brooks 5'5", not Gary Coleman 4'7"

Nonfatal Firearm-Related Crime
Nonfatal firearm-related crime has fallen significantly in recent years, from almost 1.3 million incidents in 1994 to a low of 331,618 incidents in 2008. Since then it has risen; in 2011 there were 414,562 incidents.[6]
As a percentage of all violent incidents (i.e., rape, sexual assault, robbery and aggravated assault), between 1993 and 2011, nonfatal gun crime has ranged from a high of 8 percent to a low of 5 percent. In 2011, firearm crimes comprised 8 percent of all violent crimes.[7]
http://www.nij.gov/topics/crime/gun-violence/

GreenStormCloud

(12,072 posts)
22. Looking at those numbers.
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 03:22 PM
Apr 2013




Gun suicides.
It is true that having a convenient means to commit suicide does increase the suicide numbers. In the UK, in the 1950s, laying your head in the oven and turning on the gas was a popular method of suicide. The kitchens became more electric and suicide numbers dropped. So fewer guns will reduce the suicide numbers. However, that is a risk that I choose to accept for myself, just as others choose to accept the risk of other types of behaviors. Protecting me from myself is not something that I wish to government to do, and that extends to not wanting the government to supervise me when I eat or drink.

Accidents.
We are a nation of 310+ million people. 606 gun accidents annually is not a large number.
3,443 died of drowning.
29,846 died of accidental poisoning
1,138 died from walking
1,449 died from Natural/Environmental (Whatever that is.)

So 606 isn't going to get me excited.

Justifiable homicides
That number excludes "excusable homicides" and does not include homicides that are first reported as murder and then are cleared later by the justice system. The actual number of legal homicides is about two or three times as high.

Criminal homicides.
If someone is going to illegally kill, does anybody here really think that they will obey a gun law? It is very rare for a legal gun owner to become an illegal killer. (Note: Rare does NOT mean never. Rare means rare) Usually illegal killers will already have a record of criminal violence. That fact is well know by criminologists, but is almost unknown by the general public. (Murder mysteries are boring if the killer is a street thug. The culprit has to be a trusted person to be interesting.)

Violent crimes.
This category isn't listed, but it is the reason why I have guns and carry one. According to the FBI there were 1,203,564 reported violent crimes in the U.S. in 2011. (2012 stats aren't out yet.) Violent crime is greatly underreported because many victims don't bother to let the police know, either because they are afraid, or because they believe that it won't make any difference. While that number is another decrease in a long continuing trend, it is still a high number. Being a victim of violent crime isn't a completely random event. Criminals select their victims for several reasons, some of which I can control, some I can't. So if a criminal does select me, he will find that I am not an easy victim. Of course, I will be happy if I am never put to that test.

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
27. you forgot an important factor
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 03:37 PM
Apr 2013
(Murder mysteries are boring if the killer is a street thug. The culprit has to be a trusted person to be interesting.)
the proximity of Jessica Fletcher or Miss Marple. Since she retired from teaching, Cabot Cove's per capita murder rate started to rival Chicago's. Whenever she visits a rich person, someone is offed.
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Jessica-Fletcher-the-worlds-craftiest-serial-killer/136881216328741


GreenStormCloud

(12,072 posts)
30. Where have I mentioned bomb suicides?
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 06:23 PM
Apr 2013

I will just have to hope that the FBI or Homeland Security catch Islamic terrorists before they act. Since I am not Islamic and don't believe that 72 virgins are waiting for me if I martyr myself, then that type of suicide won't appeal to me.

If I should suffer from such a condition that I may wish to end my life, then I will breathe pure nitrogen to end it. Such an end is cheap, fast, painless, and doesn't leave a mess. (Remember to void bowel and bladder just before leaving.) It is MY life, and if I ever choose to end it, that is will be MY choice.

 

beevul

(12,194 posts)
31. The vpc? Seriously?
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 07:37 PM
Apr 2013

One could lay an unpopped bag of popcorn in their proximity, and the radiation from them cooking books would pop it.

They are as bad, and likely worse, than the nra.

jimmy the one

(2,708 posts)
45. guncontrol nowt, ccw nowt
Sat Apr 27, 2013, 09:03 AM
Apr 2013

krispos: Our common liberal values caused the crime rate to plunge nationwide. Not gun-control laws, but environmental and woman's-rights laws.

Nationwide I won't argue, but statewide guncontrol efforts have made a discernible contributing difference in lowering crime in particular states, not that much maybe 10-20%, but worth it to them.
Here is a report which somewhat backs you up in that it contends guncontrol has had little to no effect on lowering of crime to 2002, along with concealed carry having little to no effect.

first, krispos wrote: The US switched over to unleaded gasoline, .. the same time, abortion was legalized, Women could now control when then gave birth, resulting in fewer instances of children being born into situations where they were more likely to become violent criminals.

the chicago report (bit dated, 2002/3) also backs you up on abortion, but nowt to do with lead:

Note (edit) - all figures are negative, thus 'increase prison pop' figs are -12, -12, -8, thus reflecting a perceived drop in crime due that factor.

Percentage change in crime that factor accounts for over period 1991–2001:
Factor ...............Homi .....Violcrime.. Propcrime.. Certainty level
Strong economy .............0 .........0 .........2 ............High
Changing demographics 0 .......2 .........5 ............High
Better policing strategies 1 .....1 ........1 ............Low
Gun control laws .........0 ........0 .........0 ............Medium
Concealed weapon laws 0 ........0 .........0 ............High

Increased usage of {DP} ...1.5 ....0 .........0 ............Medium
Increases number police ...5.5 ....5.5 ......5.5 ...........Medium
Increase prison population 12 ...12 ........8 ............High
The decline of crack ............6 .....3 ........0 ............Low
Legalized abortion .............10 ....10 .......10 ............Medium
Total of all factors ......... 36 .....33.5 ......31.5
change in UCR reported crime ..43 ..34 .......29
change in NCVS victimization n/a...50 ......53

http://pricetheory.uchicago.edu/levitt/Papers/LevittUnderstandingWhyCrime2004.pdf

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
47. Ok, everyone. The VPC has challenged us to actually kill people now.
Sun Apr 28, 2013, 09:35 PM
Apr 2013

Instead of allowing a crime/felony in progress be halted by the threat of force in self defense, or ceasing fire when the threat is withdrawn, the VPC would kindly like you to simply skip directly to opening fire, and also please aim accurately, so the statistics will reveal the true self-defense rate by only looking at excusable homicides or justifiable homicides, and no other data.

Thank you for your cooperation.

Howzit

(967 posts)
48. There seems to be a lot of actual cases of defensive gun use consolidated here:
Thu May 9, 2013, 07:38 AM
May 2013
http://www.reddit.com/r/dgu/

Just a glance of these reported cases calls into question the use or meaning of the word "rarely"...
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Guns are Rarely Used to K...