Feminists

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts) Fri Apr 12, 2013, 07:31 PM Apr 2013

Is there another viable female presidential candidate for 2016?

Besides Hillary Clinton, who do we have?

Is there an up and coming candidate that we could groom for such a race?

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Is there another viable female presidential candidate for 2016? (Original Post) Gravitycollapse Apr 2013 OP

I want Debbie Wasserman-Schultz to run if Hillary decides not to. Even if Hillary applegrove Apr 2013 #1

Warren for President 2016. NYC_SKP Apr 2013 #2

If Warren can back down the banksters rurallib Apr 2013 #4

Elizabeth Warren. Warren DeMontague Apr 2013 #3

Warren, maybe Duckworth. mwrguy Apr 2013 #5

not ready mopinko Apr 2013 #6

A long shot but I'd say Kamala Harris has potential. Gormy Cuss Apr 2013 #7

Elizabeth Warren. nt Zorra Apr 2013 #8

Warren seems to have all the right stuff. Whisp Apr 2013 #9

A new and promising candidate kansasgurl2012 Apr 2013 #10

I've always thought Debbie Stabenow of Michigan had potential but I've never heard her mentioned as Rowdyboy Apr 2013 #11

applegrove

(118,501 posts)

1. I want Debbie Wasserman-Schultz to run if Hillary decides not to. Even if Hillary

Reply to Gravitycollapse (Original post)

Fri Apr 12, 2013, 07:40 PM

Apr 2013

does run I'd love to see Wasserman-Schultz in the running. Lots of gravitas in the debates would make Hillary look great too.

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)

2. Warren for President 2016.

Reply to Gravitycollapse (Original post)

Fri Apr 12, 2013, 07:41 PM

Apr 2013

IMHO, Hillary Clinton is a non-starter.

rurallib

(62,387 posts)

4. If Warren can back down the banksters

Reply to NYC_SKP (Reply #2)

Fri Apr 12, 2013, 07:55 PM

Apr 2013

she should shoot to #1.
Right now she is my favorite.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)

3. Elizabeth Warren.

Reply to Gravitycollapse (Original post)

Fri Apr 12, 2013, 07:53 PM

Apr 2013

mwrguy

(3,245 posts)

5. Warren, maybe Duckworth.

Reply to Gravitycollapse (Original post)

Fri Apr 12, 2013, 07:57 PM

Apr 2013

mopinko

(70,023 posts)

6. not ready

Reply to mwrguy (Reply #5)

Fri Apr 12, 2013, 09:07 PM

Apr 2013

but doing well.

Gormy Cuss

(30,884 posts)

7. A long shot but I'd say Kamala Harris has potential.

Reply to Gravitycollapse (Original post)

Fri Apr 12, 2013, 09:27 PM

Apr 2013

She has no Federal experience but is AG of California. From what I have seen, does well as a candidate.

Zorra

(27,670 posts)

8. Elizabeth Warren. nt

Reply to Gravitycollapse (Original post)

Sat Apr 13, 2013, 02:30 AM

Apr 2013

Whisp

(24,096 posts)

9. Warren seems to have all the right stuff.

Reply to Gravitycollapse (Original post)

Sat Apr 13, 2013, 02:45 AM

Apr 2013

She consistently comes across as being honest, and she is probably very disliked by the firm Chelsea Clinton works for.

kansasgurl2012

(8 posts)

10. A new and promising candidate

Reply to Gravitycollapse (Original post)

Thu Apr 18, 2013, 12:03 AM

Apr 2013

Me?

I mean really, what female candidate does the Dem party have for 2016?
We need more female politicians and candidates!!

Tell your daughters- activism!

Rowdyboy

(22,057 posts)

11. I've always thought Debbie Stabenow of Michigan had potential but I've never heard her mentioned as

Reply to Gravitycollapse (Original post)

Tue Apr 23, 2013, 01:16 AM

Apr 2013

a possible candidate. I have no idea why she isn't appreciated more-she has a solid legislative background, she's 62, from Michigan-whats not to like? But apparently it isn't meant to be.

Reply to this discussion