Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Women's Rights & Issues
Related: About this forummcconnell and judd: what it means when we talk about gender and mental health
McConnell and Judd: What It Means When We Talk About Gender and Mental Health
. . . . .
A McConnell aide says:
She described having children as selfish, and she thinks its unconscionable to breed. So you put that with what well talk to you later about her sort of pro-choice stance and its sort of a, you know, pretty extreme posture to take. She also is critical of, of fathers giving away their daughters in marriage ceremonies. She says its a common vestige of male dominion over a womens reproductive status when her father gives her away at a wedding. And then shes clearly for pro-abortion.
The room moves next to Judds religious beliefs (the aide describes it as oddly syncretic approach to Christianity) and to her mental health. The aide says:
Ah, and again. Shes clearly, this sounds extreme, but she is emotionally unbalanced. I mean its been documented. Jesse can go in chapter and verse from her autobiography about, you know, shes suffered some suicidal tendencies. She was hospitalized for 42 days when she had a mental breakdown in the 90s.
As Mother Jones points out, Judd has been open about her mental health maintenance and wrote about it in her autobiography. But what is perhaps more disturbing is that rather quick and seamless elision between Judds reproductive choices (its unconscionable to breed) to her mental health (emotionally unbalanced). Though some have dismissed the recordings as little more than the inner workings of the Washington machine and employed a rather willful blindness about the slippage of language, the discussion had by McConnell and his aides is by no means neutral. Rather, it is near Freudian, bound by a messy and gendered history of sanity. Childlessness here seems as an indictment, and sexuality as a sign of hysteria.
I use Sigmund Freud here not for the sake of glibness but because his work is the apex of centuries of hand-wringing over womens sexuality and the long-held belief that a womans mental health is deeply tied to that sexuality. Perhaps Freuds case study of a woman called Dora is the most familiar, in which the psychoanalyst attempted to diagnosis and subsequently treat feminine hysteria. For Freud, Doras mental distress stemmed from her sexualityor rather what he perceived as female sexualityand thus treatment was pre-determined by a set of cultural mores that determined how and what women should desire. For Freud, that was bound to motherhood.
Though Freud, like his teacher, the French physician Jean-Martin Charcot, was seeking a clinical/scientific diagnosis of hysteria, the disease itself was still bound to gender, sexuality and a kind of morality. As the literary scholar Janet Beizer has written, The womb [is] a metaphoric agent of hysteria. Indeed, the ties between womens sexuality and sanity were so embedded in scientific and culture discourses that Victorian doctors often prescribed clitoral stimulation has a cure for feminine madness. That womens sexuality was long tied to the construction of sanity is no surprise, since those at the margins of society have long been the victims of the processes of creating the normative. Indeed, the very idea of hysteria is inherently feminine and, like so many mental disorders, is both formed and inscribed on the bodies of women.
. . . .
McConnells discussion of Judd reminded me of the epic slut-shaming of Sandra Fluke during the last election cycle. In case youve forgotten, Fluke dared to advocate for insurance-covered birth control. But for some reason her advocacy drove right-leaning pundits to their own paroxysms: from Rush Limbaugh calling her a slut and a prostitute to Ann Coulter spelling it out quite clearly by calling Fluke a hysterical drama queen. Certainly it seems that the twinning of sexuality and mental fitness is still a political tool deployed regularly to discredit women and their ability to make rational decisions.
. . . .
http://msmagazine.com/blog/2013/04/11/mcconnell-and-judd-what-it-means-when-we-talk-about-gender-and-mental-health/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 883 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
mcconnell and judd: what it means when we talk about gender and mental health (Original Post)
niyad
Apr 2013
OP
enough
(13,256 posts)1. Thanks, haven't seen anything from Ms. mag in a long time. This is an interesting
approach.
mindwalker_i
(4,407 posts)2. The response to McConnell
Too bad being an asshole isn't considered a mental illness or he could have gotten help.
Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)3. Very good analysis. n/t