Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
LGBT
Related: About this forumThe Hidden Cost of Health Care for Same-Sex Couples
For same-sex couples, whose marriages aren't recognized by the federal government, the costs of getting health care add up quickly.Mike Bosia and Steven Obranovich, of Hardwick, Vt., were married three years ago after Vermont legalized same-sex marriage. As Bosia's spouse, Obranovich is entitled to health insurance through Bosia's employer, Saint Michael's College in Colchester.
But that coverage comes at a cost.
The couple estimates that they have had to pay $4,500 in additional federal income tax and filing-related expenses because the federal government is prohibited by the Defense of Marriage Act from recognizing same-sex marriages. Bosia, 51, has to pay that tax on the value of the health coverage he gets for Obranovich, 45.
Bosia says the difference in tax treatment at the state and federal levels creates headaches for the couples accountant at tax filing time.
Dealing with the different rules, he says, "takes more time and costs more."
According to a report published by two think tanks, the Center for American Progress and the Williams Institute, which conducts research on gender identity and sexual orientation, an employee who buys health insurance for a domestic partner of the same or opposite sex pays $1,069 more a year in federal taxes, on average, than a worker in a heterosexual marriage would pay for the same coverage.
http://www.advocate.com/health/2013/04/09/hidden-cost-health-care-same-sex-couples
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1493 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Hidden Cost of Health Care for Same-Sex Couples (Original Post)
William769
Apr 2013
OP
I think thepotential loss of this tax revenue is why DOMA has not been repealed n/t
REACTIVATED IN CT
Apr 2013
#3
REACTIVATED IN CT
(2,965 posts)1. Not only is the cost of the spouse's coverge taxable for
federal purposes (FIT,FICA, etc) but an employee can't make pre-tax payments for heir contributions for.the same-sex spouse rhru a cafeteria plan. Nor can the spouse be covered under a Flexible Spending plan (FSA). when I had to impute income on a W2, I had to use the cost of single coverage as the value of the spouse's coverage even if the employee already had family coverage for his/her kids. So, even though the company didn't pay a penny more to cover the same sex spouse the employee got hit with snother $6,000 of taxable income.
Marriage is an economic arrangement as far as the State is concerned
MNBrewer
(8,462 posts)2. My partner has to pay tax on the benefits we obtain through his employer
Thanks, Bill Clinton and Paul Wellstone.
REACTIVATED IN CT
(2,965 posts)3. I think thepotential loss of this tax revenue is why DOMA has not been repealed n/t
MNBrewer
(8,462 posts)4. Republicans hate all taxes
except the ones paid by teh gays.
mitchtv
(17,718 posts)5. I've been getting that little add on to my W2
for years so far.