Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,823 posts)
Tue Apr 30, 2013, 08:58 AM Apr 2013

Grand Canyon uranium mining set to go ahead despite ban from Obama

Source: The Guardian

Grand Canyon uranium mining set to go ahead despite ban from Obama

Leslie Macmillan
guardian.co.uk, Tuesday 30 April 2013 12.39 BST

Uranium mining on the doorstep of the Grand Canyon national park is set to go ahead in 2015 despite a ban imposed last year by Barack Obama.

Energy Fuels Resources has been given federal approval to reopen its old Canyon Mine, located six miles south of the canyon's popular South Rim entrance, that attracts nearly 5 million visitors a year.

The Canadian company says that the Obama administration's ban on new hard-rock mining over 1m acres doesn't apply because its rights date from when it closed over 20 years ago.

However, its approval is based on an environmental study the US Forest Service conducted more than 25 years ago, in 1986.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]

Read more: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2013/apr/30/grand-canyon-uranium-mining

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Grand Canyon uranium mining set to go ahead despite ban from Obama (Original Post) Eugene Apr 2013 OP
Sigh....wny not? Let's melt down the Statue of Liberty while we are at it. dixiegrrrrl Apr 2013 #1
Makes more sense than the decision in the OP ... Nihil May 2013 #4
Yeah. sure. Screw that national park bullshit. bunnies Apr 2013 #2
"There are over 3,000 mines in the Grand Canyon area that hold such claims." kristopher Apr 2013 #3
 

Nihil

(13,508 posts)
4. Makes more sense than the decision in the OP ...
Thu May 2, 2013, 11:05 AM
May 2013

> Let's melt down the Statue of Liberty while we are at it.

The statue is merely a myth, a nostalgic view of an utopia that never existed, whereas the
Grand Canyon is real and a wonder to be retained for the future without deliberately destroying
parts of it (and hence the whole of it) in the pursuit of profit.


kristopher

(29,798 posts)
3. "There are over 3,000 mines in the Grand Canyon area that hold such claims."
Tue Apr 30, 2013, 09:14 AM
Apr 2013

"Observers say the outcome of the lawsuit is important, because it could serve as a bellwether for how future attempts to re-open old uranium mining claims in the area will go. ... "A lot of people out there want their piece of the park," said Dave Uberuaga, superintendent of Grand Canyon national park, citing "incredible pressure" from mining and other industries to develop land in the area."

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Grand Canyon uranium mini...