Bloomberg Ranks "Greenest Banks" While Completely Ignoring Fossil Fuel Loans & Investments
This week, Bloomberg published the results of its third annual ranking of the worlds greenest banks: Citi was ranked first, followed by Santander and JPMorgan. The study assesses banks based on their lending to clean-energy projects and reduction in their own power consumption and carbon footprints. However, banks support for dirty energy, such as fossil fuel and nuclear power, is notably absent from Bloombergs methodology. When the value of banks finance for fossil fuels so often dwarfs their investments in renewables, Bloombergs data does not even tell half of the story.
One question mark over Bloombergs ranking is its definition of clean energy, and in particular its inclusion of hydropower (including large environmentally and socially destructive dam projects) and biomass/biofuels in this definition.
But the fundamental problem with its approach lies in the complete omission of banks investments in fossil fuels and nuclear energy. While banks growing investments in green energy are to be welcomed, it is even more crucial that investments in fossil fuels drop drastically in the coming years if we are to have a chance of avoiding catastrophic global warming. The ratio of green to brown investments would provide a meaningful study on the level of greenness of a bank, but looking at clean investments alone makes this little more than a PR exercise for the banking sector.
To give a concrete example of this problem, BankTrack, together with urgewald, Groundwork and Earthlife Africa, released the Bankrolling Climate Change report in Durban in 2011. The report is an investigation into the coal investments of the worlds leading banks. We looked at the funding of 93 international banks in 71 coal companies between 2005 and 2011 to identify the top 20 climate killer banks in the world. The results show a significant overlap between Bloombergs worlds greenest banks and the top 20 climate killer banks. In fact, seven of Bloombergs top ten appear in the Climate Killer list.
EDIT
http://understory.ran.org/2013/04/10/seven-of-bloombergs-top-ten-greenest-banks-are-climate-killers/