Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
Related: About this forumVital Signs Chart: Still 3 Job Seekers for Every Opening
Last edited Fri Apr 12, 2013, 02:11 PM - Edit history (1)
Vital Signs Chart: Still 3 Job Seekers for Every OpeningApril 10, 2013, 9:04 AM.
By Sudeep Reddy
Job openings reached a postrecession high in February. Employers had 3.9 million positions open, up 11% from a year earlier and the most since May 2008. With 12 million Americans unemployed in February, there were 3.1 job seekers for every opening. There were 6.7 job seekers per opening in July 2009 when the recovery started and 1.8 when the recession began in December 2007.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1025 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Vital Signs Chart: Still 3 Job Seekers for Every Opening (Original Post)
mahatmakanejeeves
Apr 2013
OP
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)1. Three? THREE???? ROFLMFAO.
Whenever I place an ad for an assistant (P/T with some vet experience) I get at least 50 applicants.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)2. That just means there's a sh88load of jobs that have NO takers, I fear
because who wants a sh88 job? Especially if the one or two or three jobs he/she has is already awful?
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)3. Don't ya love how they try to make it look better than it is, and it still looks like shit?
This, btw, leaves out table A:38, one of my personal favorites, here -
HOUSEHOLD DATA
NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED
A-38. Persons not in the labor force by desire and availability for work, age, and sex
Line 3 - Want a job(1)
Mar 2012
6,041
Mar 2013
6,399
That's another 6.3 million beyond what is in that chart, and worse than last year. Makes the unemployment rate look better by moving them off the U3 numbers.