Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FogerRox

(13,211 posts)
Wed Apr 10, 2013, 09:59 PM Apr 2013

23 million

A return to New Deal infrastructure spending: 6% of GDP-900 billion, would create about 23 million jobs (22.5).

26 million under employed or unemployed, U6 is at 21.5 million. Fudge it: 23 million.

The CBO scoring of the 75 yr SS shortfall is .6% of GDP, which would equal 23 million jobs at 31.5k producing 89.3 billion in FICA. 15 trillion dollar economy, .6% is 90 billion.

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

tularetom

(23,664 posts)
1. Yeah but those 23 million would have to be paid for those jobs
Wed Apr 10, 2013, 10:03 PM
Apr 2013

And all that money that would have to go to pay them would be unavailable for the 1% to stick in their offshore accounts.

You have to understand the new economy.

FogerRox

(13,211 posts)
3. Infrastructure multplier is
Wed Apr 10, 2013, 10:11 PM
Apr 2013

2 to 2.5, in a recession use 2.5. In Good times use 2.

We have a 15 trillion dollar economy. 6% of GDP (15trillion times 6%) is 900 billion, times 2.5% equals 22.5 million jobs created.

mbperrin

(7,672 posts)
5. Okay. If the US would return to the same percentage on spending for infrastructure that
Wed Apr 10, 2013, 10:15 PM
Apr 2013

we did during the New Deal, it would create 23 million jobs at $32,000 per year. That would employ all of the officially unemployed as well as the "discouraged" workers in our economy.

In turn, those new wage earners would be paying into Social Security in an amount great enough to overcome the now-projected deficit that will occur in SS in 75 years.

So, new infrastructure, roads, bridges, national parks, power plants and so on; everyone who wants a job has one, and Social Security is solvent with full benefits forever (or for 75 years at least, which forever for someone 61 like me.)

Sound good? It would be.

FogerRox

(13,211 posts)
7. Excellent job. I'm in a data geek mode
Wed Apr 10, 2013, 10:19 PM
Apr 2013

sometimes its hard to speak English.

Thanks for the assistance. DOH ! LOL

mbperrin

(7,672 posts)
9. Your data was excellent. I teach economics to 18 year olds,
Wed Apr 10, 2013, 10:36 PM
Apr 2013

so I HAVE to keep translating!

Keep after 'em. The truth is with us, although all the danged money and political influence seems to be the other way. Dang.

FogerRox

(13,211 posts)
11. Me: Self taught. Whats crazy is
Wed Apr 10, 2013, 11:57 PM
Apr 2013

All that is off the top of my head. I write so much @ Daily kos, & DU, that the research stays fresh.

FogerRox

(13,211 posts)
10. Oh yeah, I hate its not even being talked about.
Wed Apr 10, 2013, 11:54 PM
Apr 2013

Let alone proposed.

22 million jobs created during the Clinton Admin, its not like its not realistic, it can be done quite easily.

FogerRox

(13,211 posts)
6. The U6 unemployment figure is 13.8%
Wed Apr 10, 2013, 10:16 PM
Apr 2013

US workforce is about 154 million. 154 million times 13.8% is 21.5 million workers. Total workers listed in the most recent report total 26 million, employed & unemployed.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Economy»23 million