Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DainBramaged

(39,191 posts)
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 11:55 PM Apr 2013

The rise and fall of AMD: How an underdog stuck it to Intel

In part one of this two-part series, we look at the evolution of AMD from a second-source supplier for companies using Intel processors towards CEO Hector Ruiz's ideal of a "premium" chipmaker that could sell to the likes of Dell and Intel.
On June 10, 2000, Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) wanted to party—and party big. The company’s CEO, Jerry Sanders, arranged to rent out the entire San Jose Arena (now called the HP Pavilion) and then paid big bucks to bring in Faith Hill and Tim McGraw, the husband-and-wife country music superstars.

Employees “could bring anybody, your wife, your kids, your friends—it was big doings. There were celebrations, gifts and awards,” recalled Fran Barton, who served as AMD’s chief financial officer from 1998 to 2001. The boss even got in on the fun. “[Sanders] was on a high wire, he did a unicycle ride. It was totally Hollywood. He could really put on a show when he wanted to put on a show.”

And why not celebrate in style? AMD’s successful Athlon chips—Ars named the Athlon its "CPU of the Year" in 1999—had finally put the screws to archrival Intel, and in 2000 the company earned nearly $1 billion in profits.

By 2005, years of solid chip design and technological execution had the company walking with a swagger, as seen in marketing stunts which challenged Intel's then-current server processors to a "dual-core duel.” Nowhere was this attitude more apparent than AMD's 2005 lawsuit against Intel for anti-competitive business practices.

http://arstechnica.com/business/2013/04/the-rise-and-fall-of-amd-how-an-underdog-stuck-it-to-intel/

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The rise and fall of AMD: How an underdog stuck it to Intel (Original Post) DainBramaged Apr 2013 OP
I prefer AMD over Intel and have for years. hobbit709 Apr 2013 #1
I dumped Intel after the 233MMX Mnpaul Apr 2013 #3
Then the giant awoke jrandom421 Apr 2013 #2

hobbit709

(41,694 posts)
1. I prefer AMD over Intel and have for years.
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 06:24 AM
Apr 2013

In my experience they're more reliable, don't die as easily, are much easier to overclock and a hell of a lot cheaper.

Mnpaul

(3,655 posts)
3. I dumped Intel after the 233MMX
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 11:56 PM
Apr 2013

Last edited Tue Apr 23, 2013, 12:55 AM - Edit history (1)

Yanked it out and replaced it with a K6-2 400. Their adding memory in pairs crap was the reason. They always seem to go with these expensive requirements for upgrades. I can't see paying a $100 premium for a mother board either. Even the high end AMD based boards are usually cheaper than the basic Intel boards.

jrandom421

(1,003 posts)
2. Then the giant awoke
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 01:35 PM
Apr 2013

And Intel's engineering and manufacturing crushed AMD's market share, after AMD's questionable acquisition of ATI.

Latest Discussions»Help & Search»Computer Help and Support»The rise and fall of AMD:...