Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ffr

(22,644 posts)
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 08:11 PM Nov 2014

Poll tax: Incentivizing civic participation in elections

Thomas Jefferson, as smart as he was, left out one important item

* A constitutional amendment requiring this one specific type of poll tax *

I support a $10,000 poll tax on every eligible voter. Here’s how it would/could work.

If an eligible voter votes, the automatic 1040 line item that makes your “Taxable Income for eligible voter” higher by $10,000, would have a next line item for “Voted Deduction = $10,100.”* Or some amount that would be greater than the poll tax penalty; subsidized by the government (of the people and by the people). This poll tax would be included in every other tax return, reflecting presidential and mid-term election years. It makes available a deduction and incentive for those who carry through with voting and could be tied digitally to each states’ registrar’s office for verification upon tax return submission.

Thus, any eligible voter who did not exercise their civic duty to either early vote/vote absentee or vote on election day would have a tax liability $10,000 greater than it would otherwise be, and in so doing, offset the suffering to their fellow eligible voter who did...

More on that: The hidden consequences of such additional pain to those affected would be that more people would probably be better informed of the political candidates and their policies in every major election, that they’d probably vote for their self-interests instead of against them, there would be higher turnout in every election, and would probably result in greater satisfaction overall in our democracy. Any corrupt party who paid voters under the table to sit out voting in lieu of payment, would probably get caught and flogged through public humiliation.

Each eligible voter could still choose not to participate and it would only penalize them for the amount of required taxable income at their effective tax rate, higher burden the higher the tax rate, not by the full amount itself. But for those in the ‘now majority’ that did exercise their civic duty, they would be rewarded with a mostly symbolic deduction and a real sense of participating in who governs the country they love.

Who knows, it might catch on with democracies across the globe and have many more positive hidden consequences.

Meh, who am I kidding. The current SCOTUS would probably overturn such an amendment in order to protect our democracy, as they see it.

*'Ineligible Voter deduction' would be $10,000 to nullify the poll tax.

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Poll tax: Incentivizing civic participation in elections (Original Post) ffr Nov 2014 OP
Why not just have Federal requirement that ALL elections are Vote-by-Mail? 99th_Monkey Nov 2014 #1
While true, it doesn't carry the same financial reward/sting to it. ffr Nov 2014 #2
cool dat ~nt~ 99th_Monkey Nov 2014 #5
Only problem is, the opposition wants fewer people to vote, not more. nt truebluegreen Nov 2014 #3
IMO, you have to start somewhere. And keep hammering away at it ffr Nov 2014 #4
 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
1. Why not just have Federal requirement that ALL elections are Vote-by-Mail?
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 08:15 PM
Nov 2014

Oregon's turnout: 70%
Nat'l ave. turnout: 35%

This ONE thing would DOUBLE the turnout. Just saying'.

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
5. cool dat ~nt~
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 08:32 PM
Nov 2014

ditto.

I like your idea, as it's the first time I'd heard of that approach. I like how it turns the $incentive$
around, to benefit actual people and not faceless heartless corporations.

ffr

(22,644 posts)
4. IMO, you have to start somewhere. And keep hammering away at it
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 08:22 PM
Nov 2014

Like Forbes' Flat Tax initiative.

The bottom line would be whether or not voters would want themselves forced into a binding constitutional amendment of their own doing.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Election Reform»Poll tax: Incentivizing c...