Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NoPasaran

(17,291 posts)
Sat Apr 20, 2013, 09:00 PM Apr 2013

Trade association sought to exclude fertilizer blenders from reporting requirements

awmakers that retailers that blend fertilizer — such as West Fertilizer Co. — should be excluded from rules requiring them to cooperate in the development of emergency plans and to publicly reveal their chemical inventories.

The Agricultural Retailers Association said in its 2012 congressional lobbying report that it seeks to “work with the EPA to clarify their new Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act interpretation of fertilizer retailer to exclude facilities that blend fertilizer.”

According to association representatives, the blending of dry fertilizer, such as ammonium nitrate, is extremely safe and lumping blenders in with manufacturers represents a regulatory burden for small businesses. It’s not clear what caused Wednesday’s explosion at the West plant, which occurred after business hours.

During a Senate Environment and Public Works Committee meeting last year, Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., declared that “if EPA continues down this road they will be imposing additional costs on hundreds of small businesses and farmers in rural America.”

http://www.statesman.com/news/news/local/trade-association-sought-to-exclude-fertilizer-ble/nXRhZ/
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trade association sought to exclude fertilizer blenders from reporting requirements (Original Post) NoPasaran Apr 2013 OP
Well. I guess any hope of getting that through has evaporated. Buzz Clik Apr 2013 #1
People forget history white cloud Apr 2013 #2
Come on! The fertilizer was in a boat! Buzz Clik Apr 2013 #4
Is violence by commission necessarily worse than violence by omission?? DreamGypsy Apr 2013 #3
The risk was a surprise to no one. Ammonium nitrate in large quantities was a fatal shock. Buzz Clik Apr 2013 #5
Maybe Senator Inhofe was surprised, certainly ignorant :+o (nt :+) DreamGypsy Apr 2013 #6
Take a look at these. white cloud Apr 2013 #7
Yeah, that's essentially the same information I posted yesterday... DreamGypsy Apr 2013 #9
Take a look at these. white cloud Apr 2013 #8
The subsequent laws written to regulate Ilsa Apr 2013 #10

DreamGypsy

(2,252 posts)
3. Is violence by commission necessarily worse than violence by omission??
Sat Apr 20, 2013, 09:36 PM
Apr 2013

From The Washington Post Residents near the Texas fertilizer plant explosion site are allowed access to homes:

14 deaths, 200 injured, 50 homes damaged

Fertilizer facilities that hold more than 400 pounds of ammonium nitrate are required to register with the Department of Homeland Security. The West company failed to do so, even though it submitted a state form last year noting it had 270 tons in stock.


And as I noted in a post yesterday Oh, ammonium nitrate is dangerous?? You'd think Texans would know: Texas City exploded...

In a kind of sick coincidence the West explosion comes exactly 66 years after America’s worst ever industrial disaster. On April 16, 1947 a fire on board a freighter at the Texas City port ignited a cargo of ammonium nitrate and caused an explosion so enormous that the ship’s anchor weighing 1.5 tons was thrown 2 miles away. Nearly 600 were killed in the blast.

...so the risk should not have been a surprise.




Reports state that nearly every home in a half-mile radius from the retail facility suffered significant damage
 

Buzz Clik

(38,437 posts)
5. The risk was a surprise to no one. Ammonium nitrate in large quantities was a fatal shock.
Sat Apr 20, 2013, 09:41 PM
Apr 2013

This is all on the owner/management.

DreamGypsy

(2,252 posts)
9. Yeah, that's essentially the same information I posted yesterday...
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 01:54 AM
Apr 2013

as I mentioned, here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2715470

It's all happened before...and it will all happen again...and again...and again.

Ilsa

(61,694 posts)
10. The subsequent laws written to regulate
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 06:54 AM
Apr 2013

And protect residents and employees should specifically mention the accidents, or be named after the accidents, so it is clear why the law was written. Then any time someone tries to undo legislation in the future, the catastrophic event has to be reconsidered.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Texas»Trade association sought ...