Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

WorseBeforeBetter

(11,441 posts)
Tue Apr 2, 2013, 09:28 PM Apr 2013

"House bill would require background checks on those seeking federal benefits"

"RALEIGH — A county social services office would need to conduct a criminal background check on all applicants and recipients of federal food and cash assistance under legislation Republican lawmakers say is necessary to protect the integrity of the programs.

....

Harris also asked the bill’s supporters the cost and who will pay for background checks for the 1.8 million people in North Carolina who currently receive assistance. But lawmakers gave no answers before approving the measure and sending it to the full House, which may take a vote this week.

Read more here: http://www.newsobserver.com/2013/04/02/2796738/house-bill-would-require-background.html#storylink=cpy


"Protect the integrity" -- their new mantra.
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"House bill would require background checks on those seeking federal benefits" (Original Post) WorseBeforeBetter Apr 2013 OP
Whew..for a minute I thought this was about background checks for the gun lovers. MichiganVote Apr 2013 #1
Our "Democratic" senator Kay Hagan doesn't support them... WorseBeforeBetter Apr 2013 #4
Sure is a weird place to live, the US. MichiganVote Apr 2013 #7
Wow. "Lawmakers" go first, the bastids. babylonsister Apr 2013 #2
Unemployment is around 9.5%... WorseBeforeBetter Apr 2013 #5
OK, I have a question. silverweb Apr 2013 #3
As of July 1st, NC will halt the federal extension of UI benefits... WorseBeforeBetter Apr 2013 #6
Probably yes FBaggins Apr 2013 #8
 

MichiganVote

(21,086 posts)
1. Whew..for a minute I thought this was about background checks for the gun lovers.
Tue Apr 2, 2013, 09:31 PM
Apr 2013

Once again, Republicans never let me down. When it comes to the stupid, they exceed my expectations.

WorseBeforeBetter

(11,441 posts)
4. Our "Democratic" senator Kay Hagan doesn't support them...
Tue Apr 2, 2013, 09:46 PM
Apr 2013
Gun Background Checks Face Long Odds In Senate
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2013/04/gun-background-checks-senate.php

And the good ol' boys controlling the NC legislature? No fucking way.

My disgust levels are off the charts...

WorseBeforeBetter

(11,441 posts)
5. Unemployment is around 9.5%...
Tue Apr 2, 2013, 09:49 PM
Apr 2013

guess this is their big idea for "job creation" -- background checks. That, and picking up trash along the roadways as part of a "Hero Crew."

silverweb

(16,402 posts)
3. OK, I have a question.
Tue Apr 2, 2013, 09:34 PM
Apr 2013

[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]Is it legal for states to set the requirements for federal benefits?

My guess is that this will never survive a legal challenge, so it's just reTHUGs making big, bold, meaningless, stupid gestures again for political purposes.

FBaggins

(26,727 posts)
8. Probably yes
Wed Apr 3, 2013, 09:03 AM
Apr 2013

Most such programs are administered by the states - often with a great deal of latitude

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»North Carolina»"House bill would require...