Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Stevenmarc

(4,483 posts)
Tue Apr 30, 2013, 08:46 AM Apr 2013

Ansel Adams.... Visionary

Would he have embraced digital photography and Photoshop, in an 83 interview the answer would appear to be yes.

"Playboy: What else do you see coming in photography?

Adams: There’s no end in sight. Electronic photography will soon be superior to anything we have now. The first advance will be the exploration of existing negatives. I believe the electronic processes will enhance them. I could get superior prints from my negatives using electronics. Then the time will come when you will be able to make the entire photograph electronically. With the extremely high resolution and the enormous control you can get from electronics, the results will be fantastic. I wish I were young again!"

The rest of the article is not only worth the read but should be required reading.

http://davidsheff.com/article/ansel-adams/

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ansel Adams.... Visionary (Original Post) Stevenmarc Apr 2013 OP
We were so lucky to have him! CaliforniaPeggy Apr 2013 #1
really MichaelSoE Apr 2013 #2
Of course he was right, but I have to say sir pball May 2013 #3
I've had good results going hybrid Stevenmarc May 2013 #4
That was a great interview! bluedigger May 2013 #5
Funny Stevenmarc May 2013 #6
I kept thinking "That's a great quote!" as I read it. bluedigger May 2013 #7
Wow! Bookmarking to keep! FourScore May 2013 #8
I've downloaded it. alfredo May 2013 #9

MichaelSoE

(1,576 posts)
2. really
Tue Apr 30, 2013, 12:30 PM
Apr 2013

i spent many hours retouching dust spots on prints. retouching negatives was beyond my skills and finances (negative retouching machines were expensive)
since photoshop, i now scan old negatives and do corrections with ease

sir pball

(4,737 posts)
3. Of course he was right, but I have to say
Wed May 1, 2013, 11:51 AM
May 2013

With B&W, digital is a poor approximation. There's nothing better than a 4x5 negative printed optically onto fiber-base paper. Oh, if only I had a few grand lying around..

Stevenmarc

(4,483 posts)
6. Funny
Thu May 2, 2013, 09:04 AM
May 2013

And I actually only did read it for the articles, lol.

Side note: it's more than a little sad to see how far the quality of journalism has fallen in such a short time when you compare this article to what passes for journalism today.

bluedigger

(17,085 posts)
7. I kept thinking "That's a great quote!" as I read it.
Thu May 2, 2013, 09:18 AM
May 2013

Then I'd read the next paragraph and think, "That's a great quote!"

The whole interview was full of them.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Photography»Ansel Adams.... Visionary