Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

no_hypocrisy

(46,038 posts)
Thu Apr 25, 2013, 08:27 AM Apr 2013

I'll go see "The Great Gatsby" but I expect to be underwhelmed.

Leonard DiCaprio looks utterly deranged in the lead role. No innocent optimism. And Carey Mulligan looks more out of it than Daisy Buchanon was. The only performance that has any promise is Tobey Maguire as Nick Carroway.

This story is almost sacred and deserves better interpretation than this version.

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I'll go see "The Great Gatsby" but I expect to be underwhelmed. (Original Post) no_hypocrisy Apr 2013 OP
I'll wait for it on Netflix. femmocrat Apr 2013 #1
Baz Lurhman CBGLuthier Apr 2013 #3
I found a local cinamax where all shows are $3 except for Tuesday $2! In_The_Wind Apr 2013 #2
I have almost no interest in it. Xyzse Apr 2013 #4
The casting seems off to me, too!... Phentex Apr 2013 #5
I thought Luhrman's 'Romeo + Juliet' was very well done. Aristus Apr 2013 #6
It's a difficult story to film because sarge43 Apr 2013 #7
Just started reading it yesterday. Haven't read it since high school? College? mnhtnbb Apr 2013 #8
It's Baz Luhrman so expect a Bollywood style flick Taverner Apr 2013 #9
Maybe it would be better if it was called.... Tommy_Carcetti Apr 2013 #10

femmocrat

(28,394 posts)
1. I'll wait for it on Netflix.
Thu Apr 25, 2013, 08:48 AM
Apr 2013

I do want to see it though. The trailers look like a more lavish production than I remember from the book.

CBGLuthier

(12,723 posts)
3. Baz Lurhman
Thu Apr 25, 2013, 09:05 AM
Apr 2013

If you liked Moulin Rouge (the recent version) and the 1996 version of Romeo and Juliet you should like this.

Otherwise it may be a challenge as he does stamp his style upon whatever he does.

Xyzse

(8,217 posts)
4. I have almost no interest in it.
Thu Apr 25, 2013, 10:28 AM
Apr 2013

I liked the Robert Redford version though.

I still remember not being able to finish his Romeo+Juliet years back. Then again, I was in high school and it just didn't sit well with me. I thought it just couldn't hold a candle to the really old version.

Seems like it told the whole story in the trailer.

Phentex

(16,330 posts)
5. The casting seems off to me, too!...
Thu Apr 25, 2013, 10:50 AM
Apr 2013

I want to see it but when I saw the cast, it left me scratching my head.

I cannot see DiCaprio in the role at all and Mulligan looks like she's 16.

Aristus

(66,294 posts)
6. I thought Luhrman's 'Romeo + Juliet' was very well done.
Thu Apr 25, 2013, 10:54 AM
Apr 2013

It captured the spirit of the play surprisingly well. The vicious rivalry, the haste and recklessness of teen romance, the violence. The trailer for 'Gatsby' makes the film look less reserved than the TV version with Toby Stephens, by far. But I expect it will capture the decadence and profligacy of the Jazz Age quite well.

sarge43

(28,940 posts)
7. It's a difficult story to film because
Thu Apr 25, 2013, 11:05 AM
Apr 2013

it's essentially a psychological drama, the character's thoughts, attitudes, motivations. Because they can't or won't communicate to one another, the viewer is often left in the dark. Nick is the only character who sees all, but a monologue doesn't work well in film. FWIW

mnhtnbb

(31,375 posts)
8. Just started reading it yesterday. Haven't read it since high school? College?
Thu Apr 25, 2013, 12:44 PM
Apr 2013

I'm struck by how visual the language is...and probably lends itself to the screen.

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»I'll go see "The Great Ga...