Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 08:43 PM Apr 2013

A Final Act for the Guantánamo Theater of the Absurd? ( Harper's Scott Horton )

A new report from Seton Hall University exposes government surveillance of attorney–client conversations

By Scott Horton

The military commissions at Guantánamo have been on hold for roughly two months now, stalled by a pressing question: Were the proceedings inside the state-of-the-art courtroom in fact being manipulated by the CIA? Back in 2009, the Obama Administration inherited a process that verged on being an international laughingstock. Political appointees had manipulated almost every step of the process, pressing to remove any doubt from the outcome. Ultimately, the thin veneer of legitimacy that remained was stripped away when military lawyers — both prosecutors and defense counsel — joined together to expose the political circus.

Team Obama promised to right this system. An interagency review process led to agreement on a significant number of reforms, and Brigadier General Mark Martins, the new chief prosecutor, made the rounds of law schools and bar associations, talking about the government’s intention to restore basic norms of justice to the process. He was persuasive, and even skeptics began to acknowledge that the proceedings had been set back on the path to respectability.

Today, however, that effort is a shambles. The military-commissions process teeters for the third time on the brink of collapse, thanks to the ham-handed snooping and manipulations of the intelligence community. The problems this time were first exposed by a moment of comic ineptitude. During a hearing in the prosecution of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, journalists and other observers behind the Plexiglas barrier noted that the sound had suddenly gone dead as defense counsel David Nevin recited the name of a motion that referred to CIA black sites. “Who,” queried Judge James Pohl, “turns that light on or off?” He was referring to a flashing red light that indicated when the audio feed was being disrupted. Not the court, it turned out. In the best Wizard of Oz tradition, the man behind the curtain appeared to be in the employ of “another government agency.” Judge Pohl at first seemed indignant over this instance of external control over his courtroom, but later resumed the proceedings, apparently accepting the arrangement as beyond the purview of his pay grade.

While that affair soon dissolved into embarrassed jokes, it paved the way for far more serious charges. Defense counsel began to make noise about the severe limitations imposed on their confidential communications with clients, reporting that their messages were being intercepted, noting that government agents routinely seized approved communications during security sweeps of prisoners’ rooms, and, most seriously, expressing suspicion that their conversations were being monitored. These suspicions appeared to be confirmed when attorneys meeting their clients for conferences discovered that the “smoke detectors” installed in the ceilings above them were in fact supersensitive surveillance devices. Bar associations across the United States denounced all of these machinations as efforts by the U.S. government to undermine the most fundamental of fair-trial rights: the ability of a client to communicate in complete confidence with his counsel.

in full: http://harpers.org/blog/2013/04/a-final-act-for-the-guantanamo-theater-of-the-absurd/
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A Final Act for the Guantánamo Theater of the Absurd? ( Harper's Scott Horton ) (Original Post) Jefferson23 Apr 2013 OP
k/r marmar Apr 2013 #1
Well, you have to understand, they really do not want to let any of these guys go free. bemildred Apr 2013 #2
I know and agree..the entire mess is very sad. What will become of these Jefferson23 Apr 2013 #5
K&R Solly Mack Apr 2013 #3
"I have said repeatedly that I intend to close Guantanamo, and I will follow through on that." Big O grahamhgreen Apr 2013 #4

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
2. Well, you have to understand, they really do not want to let any of these guys go free.
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 09:35 PM
Apr 2013

And it is not because of what they might do, but what they might say. They can and will give devastating testimony from personal observation, and they will back each other up, once able to.

The way to read all this need for control is as a sign of perceived weakness in their position examined in the light of day, and they know that quite well. The government fears no "smoke detectors" far more than they fear discovered "smoke detectors", and no little red lights more than angry judges.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
5. I know and agree..the entire mess is very sad. What will become of these
Tue Apr 23, 2013, 03:43 PM
Apr 2013

individuals, I don't know. I wonder if any of them will eventually be heard in a public way, even if only
through their attorneys. Their accounting of the ordeal is crucial for their own survival, and no exaggeration
imo, our own as well.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»A Final Act for the Guant...