Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
A Final Act for the Guantánamo Theater of the Absurd? ( Harper's Scott Horton )
A new report from Seton Hall University exposes government surveillance of attorneyclient conversationsBy Scott Horton
The military commissions at Guantánamo have been on hold for roughly two months now, stalled by a pressing question: Were the proceedings inside the state-of-the-art courtroom in fact being manipulated by the CIA? Back in 2009, the Obama Administration inherited a process that verged on being an international laughingstock. Political appointees had manipulated almost every step of the process, pressing to remove any doubt from the outcome. Ultimately, the thin veneer of legitimacy that remained was stripped away when military lawyers both prosecutors and defense counsel joined together to expose the political circus.
Team Obama promised to right this system. An interagency review process led to agreement on a significant number of reforms, and Brigadier General Mark Martins, the new chief prosecutor, made the rounds of law schools and bar associations, talking about the governments intention to restore basic norms of justice to the process. He was persuasive, and even skeptics began to acknowledge that the proceedings had been set back on the path to respectability.
Today, however, that effort is a shambles. The military-commissions process teeters for the third time on the brink of collapse, thanks to the ham-handed snooping and manipulations of the intelligence community. The problems this time were first exposed by a moment of comic ineptitude. During a hearing in the prosecution of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, journalists and other observers behind the Plexiglas barrier noted that the sound had suddenly gone dead as defense counsel David Nevin recited the name of a motion that referred to CIA black sites. Who, queried Judge James Pohl, turns that light on or off? He was referring to a flashing red light that indicated when the audio feed was being disrupted. Not the court, it turned out. In the best Wizard of Oz tradition, the man behind the curtain appeared to be in the employ of another government agency. Judge Pohl at first seemed indignant over this instance of external control over his courtroom, but later resumed the proceedings, apparently accepting the arrangement as beyond the purview of his pay grade.
While that affair soon dissolved into embarrassed jokes, it paved the way for far more serious charges. Defense counsel began to make noise about the severe limitations imposed on their confidential communications with clients, reporting that their messages were being intercepted, noting that government agents routinely seized approved communications during security sweeps of prisoners rooms, and, most seriously, expressing suspicion that their conversations were being monitored. These suspicions appeared to be confirmed when attorneys meeting their clients for conferences discovered that the smoke detectors installed in the ceilings above them were in fact supersensitive surveillance devices. Bar associations across the United States denounced all of these machinations as efforts by the U.S. government to undermine the most fundamental of fair-trial rights: the ability of a client to communicate in complete confidence with his counsel.
in full: http://harpers.org/blog/2013/04/a-final-act-for-the-guantanamo-theater-of-the-absurd/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1640 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A Final Act for the Guantánamo Theater of the Absurd? ( Harper's Scott Horton ) (Original Post)
Jefferson23
Apr 2013
OP
Well, you have to understand, they really do not want to let any of these guys go free.
bemildred
Apr 2013
#2
"I have said repeatedly that I intend to close Guantanamo, and I will follow through on that." Big O
grahamhgreen
Apr 2013
#4
marmar
(76,985 posts)1. k/r
bemildred
(90,061 posts)2. Well, you have to understand, they really do not want to let any of these guys go free.
And it is not because of what they might do, but what they might say. They can and will give devastating testimony from personal observation, and they will back each other up, once able to.
The way to read all this need for control is as a sign of perceived weakness in their position examined in the light of day, and they know that quite well. The government fears no "smoke detectors" far more than they fear discovered "smoke detectors", and no little red lights more than angry judges.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)5. I know and agree..the entire mess is very sad. What will become of these
individuals, I don't know. I wonder if any of them will eventually be heard in a public way, even if only
through their attorneys. Their accounting of the ordeal is crucial for their own survival, and no exaggeration
imo, our own as well.
Solly Mack
(90,740 posts)3. K&R
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)4. "I have said repeatedly that I intend to close Guantanamo, and I will follow through on that." Big O