Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

elleng

(130,721 posts)
Fri Apr 5, 2013, 10:37 PM Apr 2013

An accident, then war with North Korea? by Wes Clark

What should be done?

First, ensure that the U.S. deterrent is capable and credible. This requires that we have the capability to both defend ourselves and strike back, and that we make it as clear as possible to the North Koreans our resolve to use these capabilities if challenged.

Second, assure our South Korean allies that we will stand with them, so they can afford politically to be restrained.

Third, strike a balance between demonstrating resolve in public and, simultaneously, working to reduce tensions. North Korea must always be given an "out" from the box of escalating threats it has constructed, but the out must not involve U.S.-South Korean concessions, apologies or any signs of hesitancy, weakness or lack of resolve. This requires artful balancing of military demonstrations, deployments, statements and behind-the-scenes dialogue with China and others in the region.

The odds are that there will be no conflict. Good odds. The U.S. and South Korean leadership is experienced. And so are those behind the young leader in the North. This is a familiar game, but one whose risks far outweigh any actual benefits to the North.

http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/05/opinion/clark-north-korea/

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
An accident, then war with North Korea? by Wes Clark (Original Post) elleng Apr 2013 OP
With his background & extremely rational thought, Wes Clark should be utilized in the DoF. pacalo Apr 2013 #1
Been saying that for YEARS!!! elleng Apr 2013 #2
At least he's speaking out, ellen! pacalo Apr 2013 #3
Yes, pac. elleng Apr 2013 #4
Wise words from a wise man. premium Apr 2013 #5
Right, premium. elleng Apr 2013 #6
So the lesson for Iran is pretty clear I think.... jimlup Apr 2013 #7

pacalo

(24,721 posts)
1. With his background & extremely rational thought, Wes Clark should be utilized in the DoF.
Fri Apr 5, 2013, 10:54 PM
Apr 2013

He would have been the perfect Secretary of Defense.

 

premium

(3,731 posts)
5. Wise words from a wise man.
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 11:59 AM
Apr 2013

Gen. Wesley Clark should have been the SecDef, he is cool, calm, and collected, he's spot on with regards to N. Korea.

jimlup

(7,968 posts)
7. So the lesson for Iran is pretty clear I think....
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 03:15 PM
Apr 2013

If you don't want to be invaded be sure to develop nuclear weapons. I mean I understand that there are lots of subtle issues in both cases still I think it is interesting that we are openly talking of attacking Iran yet the idea of doing so to N. Korea is unthinkable as we understand that it would be a trip wire to an unacceptable conflict.

Not suggesting a solution, just pointing out the problem and the difference in policy which is striking.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»An accident, then war wit...