Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,767 posts)
Fri May 22, 2020, 01:38 PM May 2020

Commentary: Trump's firings meant to silence the watchdogs

By David C. Williams / The Washington Post

President Trump’s spate of inspector general removals this spring is alarming, and every American should be concerned about the state of federal government oversight. But the problem with Trump’s actions is not simply removing the watchdogs; it’s also the chilling effect left on those who remain and the fact that the president is replacing some of the ousted officials with thinly credentialed political loyalists.

Inspectors general were established to conduct independent, dogged investigations into federal government agencies and report their findings freely to Congress and the public. Yet at the very time we need thorough oversight of the federal government’s expansive coronavirus relief spending, the president is conducting a war on those tasked with holding him accountable.

Trump’s removal of inspectors general has a deleterious impact on the entire inspector general community. Particularly with the removals of Michael Atkinson as inspector general for the intelligence community and Steve Linick as inspector general for the State Department, there’s a strong indication that the president fired them simply because of their involvement in investigations that cast the administration in a negative light.

And it is hard to interpret Trump’s decision to replace acting Defense Department inspector general Glenn Fine, chosen to lead a panel of inspectors general overseeing the coronavirus relief funds. Fine represents the best of the best within the IG community. He has a long history of successes in ferreting out sophisticated frauds and wrongdoing. That’s a reason to keep him, not replace him.

https://www.heraldnet.com/opinion/commentary-trumps-firings-meant-to-silence-the-watchdogs/?utm_source=DAILY+HERALD&utm_campaign=7db075f145-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_d81d073bb4-7db075f145-228635337

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Commentary: Trump's firings meant to silence the watchdogs (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin May 2020 OP
Highly qualified and experienced is beside the point, when you want a totalitarian apparatchik. Thomas Hurt May 2020 #1
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Commentary: Trump's firin...