What the Hell Happened to Hugh Hewitt?
https://www.thedailybeast.com/what-the-hell-happened-to-hugh-hewitt?ref=scrollHes lost his f*cking mind, a senior MSNBC colleague told The Daily Beast, lamenting how the conservative intellectual has morphed into a Lou Dobbs-like booster of the president.
When Hillary Clintons campaign in 2016 wanted to reach conservative voters, they decided there was only one person in right-leaning media whod give them a fair shake: Hugh Hewitt.
According to multiple sources, the Clinton campaign considered playing ball with Hewitts radio program because advisers viewed him to be an even-keeled, serious-minded conservative pundit who could have a civilized, intellectual, and issues-focused discussion with the former secretary of state. She eventually appeared on the show in 2017.
Nearly three years later, however, the likelihood that any top 2020 Democratic presidential candidate would even consider an appearance on Hewitts show is closer to zero.
Since President Donald Trump took office, it seems, Hewitt has undergone a dramatic political shift mirroring the path of the Republican Partyone that has become increasingly about fealty to the president, above all other valuesleaving some of the radio hosts friends dumbfounded.
More at the link
Rorey
(8,445 posts)I had forgotten all about that horrid person, and now his voice is stuck in my head again.
Thanks.
RhodeIslandOne
(5,042 posts)I think it's pretty simple that he saw what a far right wing president with no conscious or morals other than to appease his base can get away with and he doesn't care how bad it is for Democracy.
OnDoutside
(19,948 posts)failed to see it until now.
Atticus
(15,124 posts)gab13by13
(21,264 posts)OnDoutside
(19,948 posts)say it, rather than see it.
Midnight Writer
(21,717 posts)Mike 03
(16,616 posts)To find the "conservative intellectual" you have to go back to a talk program he did for PBS in Los Angeles in the 90s called "Life and Times" where he engaged in civil debate with a liberal Democrat. I barely remember this program but it was somewhat tolerable.
That's the last time, really, he could have fooled anybody. Same with Dennis Prager. At the beginning of his career he could have fooled most people into believing he was an actual human being, if not an "intellectual" at least a thoughtful person open to the ideas of others. They both revealed themselves to be extreme fools by the end of the 90s or early 2000s.
MurrayDelph
(5,292 posts)His basic logic was "Republicans are never wrong, even if they say something that is 180° different than what they said yesterday."
roscoeroscoe
(1,369 posts)Describes him as an android programmed to spew talking points.
I hate seeing his nonsense printed in the Washington Post.
czarjak
(11,254 posts)Cost be damned.
Skittles
(153,113 posts)Sloumeau
(2,657 posts)I have no idea why some people are only figuring this out now.
Hekate
(90,562 posts)She has very little patience with Trump-apologists.