Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
Fri Apr 26, 2013, 10:04 AM Apr 2013

Cameron downplays possibility of military action in Syria

Source: JPost

British Prime Minister David Cameron said Thursday that there was limited but growing evidence that the regime of Syrian President Bashar Assad had used chemical weapons in Syria, but added that it was unlikely that this would trigger British military action.

Cameron's comments came after the White House said on Thursday that Assad's government had probably used chemical arms on a small scale, but that US President Barack Obama needed proof before he would act.

...............................

He agreed with Obama's assertion that the use of chemical weapons was a "red line," but said that Britain was trying not to make the mistake of rushing to judgment without verifying the evidence.

Cameron stated that he would not like to see British troops on the ground in Syria, but he does support increasing pressure on the Assad regime.


Read more: http://www.jpost.com/Middle-East/Cameron-downplays-possibility-of-military-action-in-Syria-311217

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Cameron downplays possibility of military action in Syria (Original Post) azurnoir Apr 2013 OP
Iraq fears holding West back in Syria, Cameron warns dipsydoodle Apr 2013 #1
Increment by increment Bosonic Apr 2013 #2

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
1. Iraq fears holding West back in Syria, Cameron warns
Fri Apr 26, 2013, 12:41 PM
Apr 2013

David Cameron has expressed concern that international action in Syria may be being held back because of fears of a repeat of the Iraq war.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-22316517

Bosonic

(3,746 posts)
2. Increment by increment
Fri Apr 26, 2013, 12:55 PM
Apr 2013

White House says options for dealing with Syria chemical weapons use include, but are not exclusive to, military force.

https://twitter.com/Reuters/status/327819855669641216

Sounds ominous...

Why not get Assad to transfer the chemical weapons to Russia until the war is resolved, one way or another, in exchange for no overt western interference in the conflict?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Cameron downplays possibi...