Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(111,977 posts)
Wed Apr 24, 2013, 10:10 PM Apr 2013

Lockheed Martin Poised to Win Orders for Up to 71 F-35s

Source: Bloomberg

Lockheed Martin Corp. (LMT) may receive a U.S. order in June for as many as 60 F-35 jets, consolidating the sixth and seven production contracts for the costliest weapons system, according to the Pentagon’s program manager

The contract may be valued at about $9 billion, according to a person familiar with negotiations between the Pentagon and Lockheed who declined to be named discussing the private talks. The number of F-35s may rise to as many as 71 if orders from other nations are included.

“We believe we can have a negotiation settlement” by May 31 “followed by final contract award in June,” Air Force Lieutenant General Christopher Bogdan, manager of the Pentagon’s F-35 program, said in prepared testimony today for a Senate Armed Services Committee panel.

The Pentagon has worked to protect the F-35 from the federal spending cuts called sequestration. Some of the money for the next group of fighters already has been obligated, sparing those funds from the across-the board reductions. Other funds may be subject to the cuts, which Air Force, Navy and Pentagon officials continue to assess.

Read more: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-04-24/lockheed-martin-poised-to-win-orders-for-up-to-71-f-35s.html

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

TexasTowelie

(111,977 posts)
2. Yes, but military industrial complex government jobs are jobs and,
Wed Apr 24, 2013, 10:18 PM
Apr 2013

well, you know what they think about everyone else that works for the government.

Fuddnik

(8,846 posts)
3. What a fucking waste!
Wed Apr 24, 2013, 10:19 PM
Apr 2013

How many schools, teachers, rail systems, highways, and unemployed workers would that boondoggle fund?

Completely bipartisanly disgusted!

Historic NY

(37,449 posts)
4. A 1.24 trillon dollar program life boondoggle for a plane that can't do..
Wed Apr 24, 2013, 11:00 PM
Apr 2013

what it was designed for and is 10yrs late off the drawing board.

Mr. Evil

(2,828 posts)
6. New war coming soon kids!
Thu Apr 25, 2013, 11:04 AM
Apr 2013

No sense in letting them go to waste. Lockheed-Martin and their contemporaries will continue to be propped up at all costs and at our expense. Taliban, radical muslims, al Qaeda, oh my! We can go back to sleep and wait for the next I-Phone to come out.

nyy1998

(1,010 posts)
7. Which version of the F-35 did they agree to?
Thu Apr 25, 2013, 11:05 AM
Apr 2013

If it was the F-35B then it really was wasteful spending since that project is such a colossal mess(and even certain generals aren't too keen on getting it). If it's the other versions, they were pretty much in line to buy those planes from the beginning.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Lockheed Martin Poised to...