Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Wed Apr 24, 2013, 05:45 PM Apr 2013

House liberals demand meeting with Obama on Chained CPI

Source: WaPo

Top House progressives are demanding a sit down meeting with President Obama to underscore their opposition to any Social Security benefits cuts as part of a Grand Bargain — a sign that the left has no intention of allowing any cuts to go forward without a major fight.

The demand is being made in a letter that is set to be mailed to the President tomorrow, and was sent my way by a source. It is signed by Congressional Progressive Caucus co-chairs Keith Ellison and Raul Grijalva, along with Dem Reps. Jan Schakowsky, John Conyers, and Donna Edwards, and Senator Bernie Sanders. It says:

,We write to request a meeting with you to discuss the inclusion of chained CPI in your recent budget proposal.

We appreciate your ongoing efforts to negotiated with Congressional Republicans in a serious, thoughtful manner, despite their unwillingness to consider a balanced approach. We also appreciate the many positive proposals in your budget, including much-needed additional revenue and the call for universal preschool. However, at a time when many Americans are struggling, cutting Social Security benefits would take money directly out of the pockets of American seniors and slow our economic recovery…a majority of Democrats in the House of Representatives and many Democratic Senators have expressed their vigorous opposition to cuts to earned benefit programs. (...)
,

-snip-

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2013/04/24/house-liberals-demand-meeting-with-obama-on-chained-cpi/
46 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
House liberals demand meeting with Obama on Chained CPI (Original Post) DonViejo Apr 2013 OP
They should not have to *demand* a meeting. Brigid Apr 2013 #1
I don't think they demanded to meet with him... DonViejo Apr 2013 #3
In fact, the should have been consulted beforehand, in fact, Obama should grahamhgreen Apr 2013 #40
A big K & R for Don Viehjo and for truedelphi Apr 2013 #2
sometimes n/t Bully Taw Apr 2013 #8
Election Season. Octafish Apr 2013 #23
... SammyWinstonJack Apr 2013 #42
re:House liberals demand meeting with Obama on Chained CPI allan01 Apr 2013 #4
Starting to see "Liberals" in headlines; not such a dirty word these Obama days. nt Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2013 #5
I'm glad that they are not letting go of this Nite Owl Apr 2013 #6
Are these folks DLC'ers?... DonViejo Apr 2013 #7
yeah you would think he'd talk to them Doctor_J Apr 2013 #9
Nothing like a little rhetoric, eh, Doc? nt DonViejo Apr 2013 #10
An accurate assessment, I would have said. FiveGoodMen Apr 2013 #12
in the end the real dems will shut up and go along Doctor_J Apr 2013 #15
"Progressive? You mean the insurance company? How much did you donate to my campaign?" yurbud Apr 2013 #45
Chained cpi will be Obama's Iraq. hay rick Apr 2013 #11
Bush hasn't even gotten a slap on the wrist over Iraq. FiveGoodMen Apr 2013 #13
Stop holding your breath. hay rick Apr 2013 #14
Oh, I have. FiveGoodMen Apr 2013 #16
Put him in a cell next to Corzine. Psephos Apr 2013 #28
Well ...wait for full ACA to kick in ...then we will see. L0oniX Apr 2013 #18
Dueling catastrophes? hay rick Apr 2013 #21
I think he is going to be known for a lot more than ACA and CPI... L0oniX Apr 2013 #32
lol grantcart Apr 2013 #37
payroll holiday was his Waterloo bigtree Apr 2013 #38
Supplemental support for lower income SS recepients was his Auschwitz. grantcart Apr 2013 #39
"liberals"??? ...whatever ...so now the interests of the elderly are liberal interests. pffft L0oniX Apr 2013 #17
Don't forget . . . Brigid Apr 2013 #19
Calling them "Democrates" is liberal. L0oniX Apr 2013 #20
Sad that they have to Carolina Apr 2013 #22
+1000 forestpath Apr 2013 #26
Go Congressional Progressive Caucus! UnrepentantLiberal Apr 2013 #24
K&R forestpath Apr 2013 #25
Good for them. Wonder which minion will be delegated to meet with 'em instead. MotherPetrie Apr 2013 #27
UPDATE: Obama responds to Congressional Progressive Caucus MannyGoldstein Apr 2013 #29
Fooled ya. AnotherMcIntosh Apr 2013 #33
They'll have to get in line behind the GOP groups invited. blkmusclmachine Apr 2013 #30
Good for them. truebluegreen Apr 2013 #31
They "Demand" a meeting? Hilarious. JoePhilly Apr 2013 #34
If social security needs more revenue.... Alva Goldbook Apr 2013 #35
or apply to investment income and you could lower it as well. yurbud Apr 2013 #43
K & R !!! WillyT Apr 2013 #36
The Progressive wing have John2 Apr 2013 #41
"We write to request a meeting ..." AtomicKitten Apr 2013 #44
K&R midnight Apr 2013 #46

Brigid

(17,621 posts)
1. They should not have to *demand* a meeting.
Wed Apr 24, 2013, 05:54 PM
Apr 2013

If Obama has a case to make about how chained CPI can help save Social Security -- not that it needs saving -- then let him make his case to them and to the American people. He has not.

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
3. I don't think they demanded to meet with him...
Wed Apr 24, 2013, 06:01 PM
Apr 2013

Last edited Wed Apr 24, 2013, 06:32 PM - Edit history (1)

WaPo headline writer was being creative. Nowhere in the letter sent to the Prez, and published by the Post, does the word "demand" appear. In fact, they wrote, "We look forward to meeting with you at your earliest convenience."

 

grahamhgreen

(15,741 posts)
40. In fact, the should have been consulted beforehand, in fact, Obama should
Fri Apr 26, 2013, 11:14 AM
Apr 2013

have presented the progressive budget, the one that works, instead of his corporatist screed.

Nite Owl

(11,303 posts)
6. I'm glad that they are not letting go of this
Wed Apr 24, 2013, 06:35 PM
Apr 2013

How come they have to ask for a meeting in the first place? I guess there isn't even a remote chance of dinner for the progressives, only the DLCers actually mean something to him.

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
7. Are these folks DLC'ers?...
Wed Apr 24, 2013, 06:43 PM
Apr 2013
Obama Discusses Budget, Other Issues With Female Senators

At a dinner on Tuesday at the White House with all female Senators, President Obama discussed the budget, the economy, immigration reform, gun control and other issues, according to a White House official.

"The President enjoyed continuing his discussion with the Senators about a wide range of items on the agenda, including working together to find common ground on budget issues and new initiatives to grow our economy, create jobs, and strengthen the middle class," a White House official said of the dinner, according to a pool report. "The President discussed our continued focus on passing commonsense immigration reform that will strengthen our national security and our economy. The group also discussed a number of other priorities, including passing measures to reduce gun violence and expanding educational opportunities for all our children. The President also reiterated his commitment to ensuring all resources remain available as a part of the ongoing investigation into the explosions in Boston last week and commended law enforcement efforts."

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/obama-discusses-budget-other-issues-with-female-senators

----------------------

Any member of the House and Senate has to ask for a meeting if they want to meet with the President. And the President also asks for a meeting when he wants to meet with one, or more, of them.
 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
9. yeah you would think he'd talk to them
Wed Apr 24, 2013, 07:13 PM
Apr 2013

Before offering up the best domestic program in history. Obama views dems in about the same way that limpballs does.

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
15. in the end the real dems will shut up and go along
Wed Apr 24, 2013, 07:30 PM
Apr 2013

Like they did with tax cuts and insurance mandates. Keystone xl will be next. They must be truly discouraged having to fight battles like this.

hay rick

(7,604 posts)
11. Chained cpi will be Obama's Iraq.
Wed Apr 24, 2013, 07:18 PM
Apr 2013

The Republican convention in 2012 was notable for completely ignoring the existence of the most recent Republican president, George W. Bush. They didn't want to be associated with his catastrophic legacy: Iraq, the housing bubble, the bank bailouts, and the great recession.

If Obama includes chained cpi in a grand bargain, it will replace PPACA as the signature accomplishment of his presidency. I don't think he wants to build a library around that.

FiveGoodMen

(20,018 posts)
13. Bush hasn't even gotten a slap on the wrist over Iraq.
Wed Apr 24, 2013, 07:25 PM
Apr 2013

He should be behind bars, but nothing whatsoever has happened to him as a result of lying us into that war.

 

L0oniX

(31,493 posts)
18. Well ...wait for full ACA to kick in ...then we will see.
Wed Apr 24, 2013, 07:38 PM
Apr 2013

At this point I'm expecting to be fucked by ACA as well as CPI.

hay rick

(7,604 posts)
21. Dueling catastrophes?
Wed Apr 24, 2013, 07:48 PM
Apr 2013

Surely one of the signature accomplishments of his presidency was his hasty removal of the public option from the menu of health care reform options. I hope the ACA mandates don't work out as badly as some are predicting.

Brigid

(17,621 posts)
19. Don't forget . . .
Wed Apr 24, 2013, 07:43 PM
Apr 2013

Republicans have always hated Social Security -- and Medicare. This is something of a new phenomenon among some Democrats.

Carolina

(6,960 posts)
22. Sad that they have to
Wed Apr 24, 2013, 07:53 PM
Apr 2013

request a meeting while the repukes and Wall Street types were invited to the White House for dinner just before the tragedy in Boston!

 

truebluegreen

(9,033 posts)
31. Good for them.
Wed Apr 24, 2013, 11:16 PM
Apr 2013

But I don't want them to express their misgivings, or send a sternly-worded letter, I want them TO VOTE NO.

That is all.

ETA: OK, if they make a big stink, that's good too.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
34. They "Demand" a meeting? Hilarious.
Thu Apr 25, 2013, 11:56 AM
Apr 2013

The letter REQUESTS a meeting ... and it does so in a rather polite and deferential manner.

But Sargent screams that they "DEMAND" a meeting.

Sargent must be losing his mind. Or more likely, he's losing EYEBALLS.

So he needs a false headline to attract some outraged eyes.

 

Alva Goldbook

(149 posts)
35. If social security needs more revenue....
Thu Apr 25, 2013, 12:53 PM
Apr 2013

....then all you have to do is INCREASE THE FICA CAP. If we just got rid of the FICA cap, social security would be solvent FOREVER. You could probably cut FICA taxes in half if we did so, and not effect the solvency of social security.

 

John2

(2,730 posts)
41. The Progressive wing have
Sat Apr 27, 2013, 06:13 AM
Apr 2013

my total support. This is our War. We should put our line in the sand and leave it there. Take notes from the Lincoln documentary on passing the 13th amendment. I got to finally watch it, and was very impressed with Lincoln and Thadeus Stephens. The President needs to place pressure on the right and not the progressives. The Progressives have the moral ground in this fight.

 

AtomicKitten

(46,585 posts)
44. "We write to request a meeting ..."
Sat Apr 27, 2013, 12:42 PM
Apr 2013

OP should have read the piece posted and they would realize the hyperbolic title "house liberals demand ..." is no more than red meat sensationalism.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»House liberals demand mee...