Kelly Ayotte's Approval Rating Plunges After Vote Against Gun Background Checks
Source: Huffington Post
WASHINGTON -- A new poll has New Hampshire Sen. Kelly Ayotte down a total of 15 points from her previous approval rating in a survey that followed her vote against requiring background checks for firearms purchases.
Ayotte's plunge underscores the changing politics around gun control and gun safety. In years past, lawmakers worried that a vote for gun control would bring the anger of the National Rifle Association. In the new reality, votes against gun control also carry a political risk, as the Ayotte (R) poll indicates.
A full three-quarters of New Hampshire voters support such background checks, along with 56 percent of Republicans, according to Public Policy Polling. A WMUR Granite State Poll taken in January and February found that more than 9 in 10 state residents supported implementing background checks at gun shows.
It's not entirely clear yet how opposition to background checks will play out at the polls, but there are signs Ayottes vote may have taken a toll.
Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/24/kelly-ayottes-approval_n_3147834.html
Excellent news. Looks like voting against common sense gun laws will have serious consequences, especially in swing states like NH.
tblue
(16,350 posts)I hope it's soon.
elleng
(130,852 posts)SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)Ayotte's was more to be expected. She is a Republican after all. But Heidi Heitkamp? She had 6 years before being up for reelection. Inexcusable.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)are meaningless because its the liberal BS!
I don't know when she runs again but she is a true blue teabagger.
El Progreso
(21 posts)Her approval is down 2%, not 15%.
15% is the total of adding the decrease in approval and the increase in disapproval. This could also be called "net approval".
Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)The actual poll doesn't show her approval "plunging," but maybe people don't want to look at the actual poll.
http://www.unh.edu/survey-center/news/pdf/gsp2013_spring_legapproval042413.pdf
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)The poll you are citing was taken April 4-9, before Ayotte's April 17, 2013 vote against background check. Maybe it's you who doesn't want to look at the actual poll.
Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)Progressive dog
(6,900 posts)I gueess they do.
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)The article does not mislead. It clearly states her approval rating went from 48% to 44%; that is 4 points, not 2 as you state. That, combined with the even more damaging fact that her disapproval rating went from 35% to 46% (11 points) is how they came up with a total loss of 15 points (4 +11=15).
elleng
(130,852 posts)One of those stupid decisions by new class of senators, who won't run again for quite a while.
RayStar
(417 posts)I hope they both be defeated in their next elections. Didn't Heidi just barely make this past election?
Tom Rinaldo
(22,912 posts)It was really quite an upset and her opponent was a teabag Republican. Her having won might mean the difference between Democrats being able to hold onto the Senate in 2014 or losing the majority. I think it makes more sense to work on changing her mind for future votes than to work on getting her defeated. It would definitely be a Republican pickup if Heidi goes down, and it wouldn't be a Scott Brown or Sue Collins type Republican who would replace her.
avebury
(10,952 posts)Democrats can hold a majority in the Senate. It seems like they can't any kind of bill passed without 60 votes anymore. Whatever happened to 51 votes?
Harry Reid should be driven out of the Senate for not obtaining filibuster reform. The Democrats need someone in charge who can whip their members into line.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)to change filibuster rules. He decided he would rather have two more years of blaming republicans for his ineptitude instead.
russspeakeasy
(6,539 posts)lancer78
(1,495 posts)Remember, DiFi was one of the dems against filibuster reform.
Your reply was very thought provoking. I guess I would rather she stay than to see any new or old style repub get the set.
EC
(12,287 posts)and she didn't have to. One of her mentors (john mccain) voted for it, so she would have had cover.
Mopar151
(9,978 posts)Her Dem. opponent (Paul Hodes) ran a low effort campaign, and was not well liked here. Rove & the boys threw a lot of money and push behind her, and she had managed her career as AG for maximum political effect, to the detriment of the state.
The gun vote was not a sea change - more like the last friggin' straw, +2.
SCVDem
(5,103 posts)Seeing her next to Graham or any of the Rethug leadership is disgusting.
She is a tool.
What a puppet!
PatSeg
(47,366 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)I don't get it. the resident gun fuckers assured us those nay votes were what the constituency wanted. what gives?
City Lights
(25,171 posts)I so hope this trend continues! :fingerscrossed:
GraniteDem
(30 posts)vote U.S. Sen. Kelly Ayotte (the only senator in New England to vote against the Toomey-Manchin bill) out of office!
Cha
(297,067 posts)New Hampshire Voter. Sorry, that vapid tool got elected in the first place.
peace frog
(5,609 posts)Hope your stay is brief and angst-filled. TTFN, numbnuts.
bossy22
(3,547 posts)Gun control isn't a major issue on 98% of american's list. OF those who actually vote the issue, pro-gun vs pro control is probably 10:1.
SkyDaddy7
(6,045 posts)No one has lost an election over it yet.
I sure hope they do but I I have my serious doubts.
BootinUp
(47,136 posts)Such a fake posing corrupt little *bleep*!
Brimley
(139 posts)Benton D Struckcheon
(2,347 posts)Largely symbolic move, but still, every little bit counts.
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)that does it.
Of course, Republics think GE is a radically liberal corporation because MSNBC started their liberal evening news programming with Keith Olbermann when GE owned NBC. And, cutting off gun shops will just reinforce their thinking.
Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)We were told all about how support for gun control would cost Democrats, but instead opposition to gun control is costing Republicans.
NickB79
(19,233 posts)As many studies have said, support for gun control is "broad but shallow". The outright anger that drives gun nuts to the polls to as single-issue voters is largely absent in the average person who supports more gun control legislation.
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)I know a guy that is fairly liberal on most positions, but always votes Republicans based on one issue - guns/gun control. He loves his guns and believes the NRA hype that Democrats are going to grab his guns.
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)When a Gallup poll was taken, here was the response:
http://www.gallup.com/poll/20098/gun-ownership-use-america.aspx
greatlaurel
(2,004 posts)I hope her poll numbers keep dropping. That woman makes me grind my teeth when she speaks. How she got elected in New Hampshire is very troubling. She cannot put together two sentences that are coherent. What a complete waste of space.
edited for typo correction.
Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)Which could explain why she was holding steady in that one.
Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)calimary
(81,192 posts)You have to do more than just tag along with the likes of lindsey graham and john mccain and make sure you get in the photograph. I mean, why aren't you out there strewing rose petals along their path like some flower girl at their wedding, kelly? That cathy mcmorris rodgers creature in the House does the same thing. They trot her out like some trained pet and she stands there framing john boner and the rest of those rogues. It's like - "oh quick, where's the girl? Be sure to get the girl in the photo. Where are ya, honey? C'mon up here - we need you in the shot... (gotta be sure to throw that ol' women's vote group a bone)."
drkedjr
(100 posts)I can't think of one thing Ayotte has done (especially for NH) but her ability to be in every picture of a Republican photo op is absolutely amazing.