Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

angka

(1,599 posts)
Tue Apr 23, 2013, 06:34 PM Apr 2013

Conservative Group Photoshops Out Minorities In Mailer Opposing Pro-Voting Legislation

Source: ThinkProgress

A conservative group connected to Colorado’s Secretary of State has been sending political mailers — including a picture of a darker-skinned woman whose face was digitally removed and replaced with a white woman’s face — in an attempt to oppose a landmark voting bill that may soon become law...

Secretary of State Scott Gessler, a frequent speaker at True The Vote events who uses his perch to warn about the supposed threat of voter fraud, is leading opposition to the bill, which is supported by a number of Republican County Clerks and the Colorado County Clerks Association.

Now, a dark money group named the “Citizens for Free and Fair Elections”, which lists its address as that of Gessler’s former firm, the Hackstaff Law Group, is sending out photoshopped mailers in an attempt to pressure the election clerks into switching their position.



Read more: http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2013/04/23/1909661/anti-voting-mailer/

36 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Conservative Group Photoshops Out Minorities In Mailer Opposing Pro-Voting Legislation (Original Post) angka Apr 2013 OP
Why? I mean, for what purpose? AtheistCrusader Apr 2013 #1
Kind of odd, too, that the image is not viewable on the Getty Image website. . . Journeyman Apr 2013 #5
And the purpose is... kathysart_decoration Apr 2013 #35
so, they made them twins? Skittles Apr 2013 #2
It's through the magic of El Shaman Apr 2013 #15
Maybe they are teaching out to the white twin vote. yellowcanine Apr 2013 #29
Racists. Hack photoshop job by Hackstaff. It's the same woman twice; that's how cheap they are. nt Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2013 #3
It looks like they got a 7 year old Control-Z Apr 2013 #4
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2013 #11
You don't think republicans are capable of this? hrmjustin Apr 2013 #12
Another, in a long line of WTF?, moments for the PukeBaggers. SoapBox Apr 2013 #6
Someone should photoshop everyone in the crowd to have that face. Liberal Veteran Apr 2013 #7
This one would be better... Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2013 #22
How lazy! They didn't even bother to get a picture tblue37 Apr 2013 #8
All those white women look alike, perhaps??? MADem Apr 2013 #28
They misspoke, er, misphotoshoped. AAO Apr 2013 #9
They also completely removed the head of a black man behind her Ash_F Apr 2013 #10
Agreed. angka Apr 2013 #18
Holy shit, you're right... octothorpe Apr 2013 #21
I think the line was supposed to represent "legitimate" voters... Ash_F Apr 2013 #33
Tall guy in a dark hoodie tblue Apr 2013 #32
lmao! You can't make this shit up. n/t geomon666 Apr 2013 #13
Racism out in the open? sakabatou Apr 2013 #14
OMG! cyberswede Apr 2013 #16
His firm was named "Hackstaff"? Oy vey. n/t MrModerate Apr 2013 #17
Setting aside the "WTF?" factor, that is some CHEESY Photoshoppin'... n/t TygrBright Apr 2013 #19
That's incredibly fucked up... octothorpe Apr 2013 #20
Same woman's face twice in the photo on the left. geckosfeet Apr 2013 #23
Perhaps they were trying to not offend minorities neffernin Apr 2013 #24
reminds me of 0rganism Apr 2013 #25
Or this one..... yellowcanine Apr 2013 #31
It's so obvious… MrScorpio Apr 2013 #26
Even the romney campaigns photoshopped a bunch of their stuff. Rs never honest about anything. Sunlei Apr 2013 #27
They might be in trouble with the owner of the image also. yellowcanine Apr 2013 #30
And the photoshopped bit is not some tiny part of the image. Nine Apr 2013 #34
They tipped their hand Alcibiades Apr 2013 #36

Journeyman

(15,026 posts)
5. Kind of odd, too, that the image is not viewable on the Getty Image website. . .
Tue Apr 23, 2013, 07:22 PM
Apr 2013

It ran originally in a newspaper article. The voters were Virginians. Wouldn't it be a hoot if it proves that the Colorado group lifted the photo from the newspaper article, and the image is licensed by Getty "for editorial purposes" only?

That would compound the trouble with their amateur Photoshop job and put it clearly in the category of a crime.

A fella can hope, right?


But ultimately, AC, I agree with you: Why? What purpose did this hackery serve?

 
35. And the purpose is...
Thu Apr 25, 2013, 02:58 PM
Apr 2013

The purpose in doing this is to attempt to make it look as though they aren't being racist. They are, so it would appear, trying to prevent people from voting fraudulently - without making it look racist. They are, they would say, not discriminating against black people. These people are white.

Control-Z

(15,682 posts)
4. It looks like they got a 7 year old
Tue Apr 23, 2013, 07:10 PM
Apr 2013

to do the Photoshopping. (My apologies to the 7 year old kids who do know how to Photoshop. I know there are probably quite a few of you out there who could have done a far better job.)

Response to Bernardo de La Paz (Reply #3)

tblue37

(65,227 posts)
8. How lazy! They didn't even bother to get a picture
Tue Apr 23, 2013, 08:56 PM
Apr 2013

of a different white woman. They just photoshopped in a copy of the face of the same white woman who was already in the pic, to the right (our left) of the woman who was photoshopped out.

Ash_F

(5,861 posts)
10. They also completely removed the head of a black man behind her
Tue Apr 23, 2013, 09:07 PM
Apr 2013

See the full image in the link.

Why? This needs to go viral.

angka

(1,599 posts)
18. Agreed.
Wed Apr 24, 2013, 11:14 AM
Apr 2013

From the low quality photoshopping to the blatantly racist motives, I've never seen anything quite like it.

octothorpe

(962 posts)
21. Holy shit, you're right...
Wed Apr 24, 2013, 01:21 PM
Apr 2013

I'm having a very hard time understanding their motivation. I don't even 'understand' why someone who hates minorities would do that. Think they'll make any statement on why they thought this was a good idea? I'm curious how they attempt to justify it.

Ash_F

(5,861 posts)
33. I think the line was supposed to represent "legitimate" voters...
Thu Apr 25, 2013, 10:51 AM
Apr 2013

...waiting in line, in person, to vote. "Legitimate" as in *hint-hint-wink-wink-youknowwhatwemean*

octothorpe

(962 posts)
20. That's incredibly fucked up...
Wed Apr 24, 2013, 01:16 PM
Apr 2013

Doesn't make any sense either. I'd like to see how the idiot who came up with this idea tries to explain it.

geckosfeet

(9,644 posts)
23. Same woman's face twice in the photo on the left.
Wed Apr 24, 2013, 06:59 PM
Apr 2013

Can't believe that they actually tried this high school photoshop job.

neffernin

(275 posts)
24. Perhaps they were trying to not offend minorities
Wed Apr 24, 2013, 07:20 PM
Apr 2013

as the caption for the picture denotes that the people in the line are criminals. Boy did that backfire (like going to a rap concert in blackface in order to fit in). Either way, it's hard to argue that this isn't propaganda... I mean in the last 20-30 years other than voter supression by the GOP how much voter fraud has there truly been?

http://www.snopes.com/politics/ballot/2012fraud.asp

Having a hard time finding any real fraud other than the mailer linked to in OP.

MrScorpio

(73,630 posts)
26. It's so obvious…
Wed Apr 24, 2013, 10:53 PM
Apr 2013

They know what they're doing is wrong, hence the way that they've photoshopped the people of color out from the original source photo. They're afraid that someone will correctly point out that their efforts to restrict the vote is just another way to restrict people of color of having ACCESS to their right to vote.

It's a tacit admission that they're nothing more than racist scumbags.

Welcome to the New Jim Crow.

yellowcanine

(35,694 posts)
30. They might be in trouble with the owner of the image also.
Thu Apr 25, 2013, 09:34 AM
Apr 2013

If they did pay for the privilege of using it it is doubtful they had permission to alter the image. My guess is that they did not have permission to use the image, let alone alter it.

Nine

(1,741 posts)
34. And the photoshopped bit is not some tiny part of the image.
Thu Apr 25, 2013, 10:56 AM
Apr 2013

Before I opened the link, I was expecting a big crowd shot. Nope. The photoshopped bit is front and center and quite large. How did they ever think they would get away with it? Even if I hadn't been looking for it, I think my eye would have gone right to it.

Alcibiades

(5,061 posts)
36. They tipped their hand
Fri Apr 26, 2013, 09:56 AM
Apr 2013

Their real goal is to disappear everyone who is not white from the electorate, and so that's what they do in their picture of voters.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Conservative Group Photos...