(New York) City Report Shows a Growing Number Are Near Poverty
Source: NYT
The rise in New York Citys poverty rate as a result of the recession has apparently eased, but not before pushing nearly half of the citys population into the ranks of the poor or near-poor in 2011, according to an analysis by the Bloomberg administration.
That year, according to the citys measure, about 46 percent of New Yorkers were making less than 150 percent of the poverty threshold, a benchmark used to describe people who are not officially poor but who still struggle to get by. That represents a rise of almost two percentage points since 2009, when the nations recession officially ended.
By the citys definition, a family with two adults and two children could earn $46,416 a year and still fall within 150 percent of the citys poverty level. Unlike the official but rigid federal poverty level, the citys measure balances the added value of tax credits, food stamps, rent subsidies and other benefits against expenses like health and day care, housing and commuting that reflect New Yorks higher living costs. The city says a two-adult, two-child family is poor if it earns less than $30,949 a year. The federal government sets the level at $22,811.
Though more New Yorkers were working in 2011 than the year before, larger shares of children and working adults were classified as poor in 2011, and the proportions of Asians, noncitizens and Queens residents overlapping groups each rose by more than four percentage points since 2008.
Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/22/nyregion/city-report-shows-a-growing-number-are-near-poverty.html
rocktivity
(44,576 posts)Geez, how in the world did this happen?
P.S. It might help if the Times didn't charge $2.50 for its weekday edition and $5.00 for it Sunday edition.
rocktivity
Skeeter Barnes
(994 posts)There should be more to work than just making a profit for your boss.
Workers should be able to live without fear of not being able to make ends meet.
They should make enough to retire with dignity one day.
Subsistence wages are not good enough, no matter what kind of job it is.
Politicians are not interested in helping us. Workers will have to do it themselves.
"In our hands, we hold a power greater than their hoarded gold."
Organize!
byeya
(2,842 posts)their minions, stooges and thugs.
Skeeter Barnes
(994 posts)This is why wages are stagnant for decades and work rules have become more and more oppressive.
LiberalEsto
(22,845 posts)"All the news that's fit for the eyes of the 1%" should be their new motto
Response to LiberalEsto (Reply #4)
rocktivity This message was self-deleted by its author.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)Hmmm.. Where did they get that "officially ended" business from? Maybe the recession, but not the Depression. This Depression isn't over until the unemployment rate goes back down to 4%. That is a slap in the face to all of those who are suffering from this Milton Freidman Shock Doctrine effing disaster capitalism Depression bullshit economy. Hell, it's a slap in the face to the entire 99%! Thanks, NYTimes. Thanks allot.
The nation's official recession pronouncer. It looks at a variety of criteria, not just unemployment numbers.
When I was in college, an unemployment rate of 6% was considered the "structural" minimum unemployment rate. They'd party at 6%. And these were the "good old days". Anything below 5% is very low, very low compared against historical norms. We hit it under Clinton. And again under Bush II.
I don't think we've been at 4% unemployment. Ever. So setting that as the minimum is rather like saying that you won't watch a baseball game until your team is "back to" scoring in the high 80s on a regular basis.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)...but I will give you a half of a percent ( i.e. 4 1/2% unemployment rate), begrudgingly, however. If capitalism is so great, then there shouldn't be anyone who can't find a job with a fucking living wage if they want one. Do you believe everything they taught you in college? Did you believe Alan Greenspan, when he said it is good for capitalism to have unemployed citizens? I'm going to stop. I respectfully disagree.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)JAbuchan08
(3,046 posts)It certainly takes a lot of perseverance and self-denial, and a lot of folks have it much worse. Sometimes I wonder how it is possible that the human infrastructure of the city maintains when the whole city feels liike an obstacle to survival