Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,006 posts)
Thu Apr 18, 2013, 02:55 PM Apr 2013

Teen: I Am Not the Boston Marathon Bomber

Source: ABC

The teenage boy authorities once investigated as possibly being connected to the Boston Marathon bombing told ABC News today he was shocked to see his face pop up on television and all over social media.

Salah Barhoun, 17, said he went to the police yesterday to clear his name after he found himself tagged in pictures online. He had just gone to watch the race, he said, but soon after the explosions, he was singled out by internet sleuths as looking suspicious. Federal authorities passed around images of Barhoun, attempting to learn more information about him, sources told ABC News.

Today The New York Post ran a story featuring a picture of Barhoun and another man circled in red, but said it was unclear if they were the same as two potential suspects spotted by law enforcement Wednesday.

ABC News producers found Barhoun through social media and spoke to him today at his home. He said he had actually wanted to run the race and when he couldn't, decided to watch.

Read more: http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/teen-boston-marathon-bomber/story?id=18990057



If this kid wins a libel lawsuit against the NY (Com)Post, he can probably pay off all 4 years of college.
23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Teen: I Am Not the Boston Marathon Bomber (Original Post) alp227 Apr 2013 OP
We all KNOW how he looks. Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2013 #1
poor kid Carolina Apr 2013 #2
They didn't know his name Yo_Mama Apr 2013 #16
Sue, Sue, Sue the filthy bastards at that rag. SoapBox Apr 2013 #3
Oh yes, Please! smirkymonkey Apr 2013 #22
But, but... it was in the paper! >> El Supremo Apr 2013 #4
That's why the picture was published Warpy Apr 2013 #8
Did you forget sarcasm smilie? Hard to tell this days... idwiyo Apr 2013 #21
He did the right thing by going to the police immediately. Sunlei Apr 2013 #5
you can't sue anything Murdoch owns olddots Apr 2013 #6
Annie Oakley shot Hearst down repeatedly, but nearly bankrupted herself by doing so. Eleanors38 Apr 2013 #15
What a great snippet! Got to read the article it's from. KittyWampus Apr 2013 #20
I doubt he would win a libel case just for "looking suspicious"..... cbdo2007 Apr 2013 #7
The best thing to do in a sad situation Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2013 #9
Who CalFresh Apr 2013 #10
Murdoch's goons profiling for Arab looking young men? I'm shocked! librechik Apr 2013 #11
Was there any retraction or apology? TomCADem Apr 2013 #23
Again....what.the.hell. angrychair Apr 2013 #12
On the pics I saw there were several white males marked. Yo_Mama Apr 2013 #17
Poor kid. I'm glad it's NEWS he's not involved. gateley Apr 2013 #13
I hope he isn't attacked by a bunch of yahoos. He probably shouldn't venture out for a few days. Dollface Apr 2013 #14
Why do you think he has been libeled? Coyotl Apr 2013 #18
Poor guy would be well advised to avoid going out in public Quantess Apr 2013 #19

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
16. They didn't know his name
Thu Apr 18, 2013, 06:15 PM
Apr 2013

The reason he was picked out was for the bag type and apparent load, positioning, etc.

Realistically, the authorities have to do this type of thing, but it is not profiling. They'll just go through all the video bit by bit and try to track any remotely possible people down, plus people they think might have been in a position where they might have seen something useful to the investigation.

If you think about it, innocent persons are more likely to be picked out first, because of course they didn't know there would be a bomb in a backpack, and they wouldn't worry about trying to be discreet. They'd just be very happily walking around without a care in the world lugging their backpacks.

In any case, the amateurs had already picked him out and put up the pics I think early yesterday - long before the papers got hold of it.

It might by this time make more sense for the authorities to ask people who were there with backpacks just to contact them so that they can work through the elimination process.

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
3. Sue, Sue, Sue the filthy bastards at that rag.
Thu Apr 18, 2013, 03:17 PM
Apr 2013

...stunning that rags like the Post can ruin someone's life.

Warpy

(111,169 posts)
8. That's why the picture was published
Thu Apr 18, 2013, 03:51 PM
Apr 2013

So either an innocent kid would come forth and identify himself or a guilty one would be identified by acquaintances and forked over to the FBI.

The only thing the Post did wrong was try to be witty about it and fail.

 

olddots

(10,237 posts)
6. you can't sue anything Murdoch owns
Thu Apr 18, 2013, 03:27 PM
Apr 2013

he learned everything from Hearst who didn't invent scum journalism but perfected it .

 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
15. Annie Oakley shot Hearst down repeatedly, but nearly bankrupted herself by doing so.
Thu Apr 18, 2013, 06:08 PM
Apr 2013

That was in the days when one's reputation was life itself, and she went after every Hearst rag and won or received settlements in 55 cases. The rumor -- she stole Cocaine from a "Negro's" trousers -- was blown out of the water early on, but she didn't settle for apologies.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/general-article/oakley-paper/


"She once turned and left a South Carolina courtroom, telling opposing attorneys that this would give 'you gentlemen who are such gallant defenders of woman's honor a chance to further your cowardice by shooting me in the back.'"

Oakley was considered the first modern American "super star." She didn't take no shit.

cbdo2007

(9,213 posts)
7. I doubt he would win a libel case just for "looking suspicious".....
Thu Apr 18, 2013, 03:32 PM
Apr 2013

Everyone who was there should go to the police to clear their names immediately, otherwise they're all suspects.

 

CalFresh

(99 posts)
10. Who
Thu Apr 18, 2013, 04:13 PM
Apr 2013

is the other guy? The teenage kid did not say (we) are not the bombers. And it's the other guy who has a backpack in one photo and it looks like it missing in the next photo. I hope they find the killers soon who ever they are.

angrychair

(8,684 posts)
12. Again....what.the.hell.
Thu Apr 18, 2013, 04:39 PM
Apr 2013

I've said this before, these stereotypes do not help us. So far the only "suspects" I've heard about have been people of color. Have they already eliminated the tens of thousands do white people already? Hate to make it a race thing but its hard not to when all the "suspects" are people of color. Haven't heard of them searching a single white person's home yet. Being a lttle tongue-in-cheek about it but I think it might be helpful to expand the possibilities beyond people of color at this point.

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
17. On the pics I saw there were several white males marked.
Thu Apr 18, 2013, 06:16 PM
Apr 2013

The kid in blue here was next to a guy with a backpack that looked like a real possibility.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Teen: I Am Not the Boston...