Disaster compensation expert Feinberg appointed to run Boston fund
Source: Reuters
Kenneth Feinberg, the attorney who oversaw compensation funds for victims of the September 11 attacks and the Virginia Tech shootings, will administer the fund for those affected by the Boston Marathon bombing, officials said on Wednesday.
Feinberg will serve as administrator of the One Fund Boston, Governor Deval Patrick and Mayor Thomas Menino said in a statement. The fund, unveiled Tuesday, was seeded with a $1 million donation from the financial services firm John Hancock.
As of 5 p.m. EDT (2100 GMT) Wednesday, the fund was up to $7 million, its sponsors said, including donations from more than 8,500 people.
Feinberg, a native of the Boston suburb of Brockton, also ran the BP oil spill fund and the fund for victims of the mass shooting in Aurora, Colorado in 2012.
Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/04/17/us-usa-explosions-boston-fund-idUSBRE93G1BY20130417
He gets PAID millions to run these funds.
When he took over the BP compensation fund in Mobile, hundreds of reports of his refusing compensation to residents filled the airwaves.
Shock doctrine at work again. He BENEFITS from our disasters.
ForgoTheConsequence
(4,868 posts)These assholes will sniff it out. Pain and suffering equals dollar signs to them.
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)graham4anything
(11,464 posts)I myself say Thank you. John Hancock gave $1million to start it.
Not too shabby.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)and does not collect a HUGE fee for himself.
Which is NOT what happened in previous cases.
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)I am sure the families and the hurt will also say Thank You.
I know the 9-11 families from my NYC said Thank You.
ForgoTheConsequence
(4,868 posts)And its always the time and place to demand transparency and accountability.
ForgoTheConsequence
(4,868 posts)This guy is shady at best.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)richdj25
(162 posts)From personal experience, and this comes way before he did the 9/11 thing, he's as shady as they come.
I did work with this guy, and money is no object, as long as it belongs to someone else and it ends up in his pockets....why do folk continue to hire this crook?
Dan Ken
(149 posts)If you do, I think the Governor and Mayor should be the people you are talking to, not putting out accusations on a public bulletin board without any facts to go along with your allegations.
If you have some evidence, data, or anything to offer, please do it to those who made the choice of this man to head up the fund here.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)of Corruption.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)DO THEIR FAMILIES GET THOUSANDS, EVEN MILLIONS (9/11)?
ForgoTheConsequence
(4,868 posts)It shouldn't bother you that the victims of these attack were compensated it should bother you that others weren't. Don't use fresh pain and suffering for your own political agenda.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)agenda"?
This compensation began with Bush; it isn't like it's an age-old American tradition.
And how, pray, do you think the recipients will be chosen? In NYC, nobody injured on the ground got one red cent.
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/manhattan/zilch_from_zadroga_OVXHXJcP8A3g6Igem57V5N
And doesn't terrorism (i.e., with a, ahem, political agenda) need to first be proven before talk of compensation commencse?
ForgoTheConsequence
(4,868 posts)And doesn't terrorism (i.e., with a, ahem, political agenda) need to first be proven before talk of compensation commencse?
You should honestly be ashamed of yourself. So many people are sitting in the hospital without limbs, a little boy is dead and you're using it for your own soap box.
Yes military families and soldiers should receive better care and compensation but that's not what we're talking about now. This is for the victims of the Boston tragedy start a thread about military families if that's the discussion you want to have.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)hepkat
(143 posts)I mean who could victims bring litigation against in this instance?
I guess the city?
Would they sue the marathon itself?
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)They are accepting donations.
anybody can sue anybody for any reason, whether the courts will uphold a suit is another matter.
hepkat
(143 posts)But just to clarify you cannot sue anybody for any reason. The courts have to allow the suit which is different from upholding a decision.