Peter Hansen, New Hampshire Lawmaker, Calls Women 'Vaginas' In Email To Colleagues
Source: Huffington Post
A Republican New Hampshire lawmaker referred to women as "vaginas" in an email to colleagues on the official legislative electronic mailing list earlier this month, drawing outrage from his own party.
State Rep. Peter Hansen (R) made the comment, first reported by New Hampshire political blogger Susan the Bruce, in an April 1 email debate with colleagues about a "stand your ground" gun bill. Hansen's colleague, Rep. Steve Vaillancourt (R) had delivered a lengthy floor speech about the benefits of retreating instead of using deadly force, to which Hansen replied in an email:
What could possibly be missing from those factual tales of successful retreat in VT, Germany, and the bowels of Amsterdam? Why children and vagina's of course. While the tales relate the actions of a solitary male the outcome cannot relate to similar situations where children and women and mothers are the potential victims.
State Rep. Rick Watrous (D) immediately criticized Hansen for his choice of words. "Are you really using 'vaginas' as a crude catch-all for women? Really?" he wrote. "Please think before you send out such offensive language on the legislative listserve.
Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/16/peter-hansen-new-hampshire-vaginas_n_3095135.html
Could you guess the party of the offender beforehand?
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)women are only vessels for baby making any means necessary.
hughee99
(16,113 posts)eggplant
(3,911 posts)erronis
(15,241 posts)Baitball Blogger
(46,700 posts)VWolf
(3,944 posts)awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)want to control women's vaginas you would think they think they own them.
Baitball Blogger
(46,700 posts)msu2ba
(340 posts)"We love you women" just won't cut it.
Boneheads.
alp227
(32,019 posts)calimary
(81,220 posts)I can't tell you how many times I've said that too my husband while we're watching the news or some such. And every single damn time, I'm correct. Although sometimes it's "let me guess: she's a republi-CON." And in those cases I'm calling it accurately also.
Pretty pathetic, isn't it? THEY're pretty pathetic, aren't they!
So if objectification is the thing, maybe we should consider the proper corollary to be "Why children and dicks, of course." And THAT turns out to be calling it accurately too.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)to all line up so they can be slapped with a dead trout
NoQuarter
(577 posts)three days dead.
alittlelark
(18,890 posts)sakabatou
(42,150 posts)Republicans ARE against women.
niyad
(113,275 posts)possessive. it appears that neither biology, intelligence, nor english are his strong points.
edbermac
(15,938 posts)cartach
(511 posts)City Lights
(25,171 posts)Response to edbermac (Reply #10)
Grins This message was self-deleted by its author.
Grins
(7,217 posts)Beacool
(30,247 posts)fujiyama
(15,185 posts)all women are, are holes to stick their dicks in, and baby carriers.
AAO
(3,300 posts)I'm not talking about the brain stem - theirs are working overtime. It's the grey matter or lack thereof that concerns me.
delrem
(9,688 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)GOP Changes Party Logo to a Proud Red Cock, The Symbol of a New Dawn
In an effort to reform their negative image as the party of the past, the Republican Party has unveiled their new logo, a proud red cock to replace their elephant logo.
Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus unveiled the new logo after the Presidents State of the Union Address. RNC Chairman Reince Priebus said, the simple fact is that we really need a new image to connect to a new generation of voters. We needed a logo that speaks to a new generation, with a new message of personal and economic freedom and not the so-called values of the Democratic Party. Im one hundred percent positive that when people see our proud red cock theyre be no doubt in their mind what we truly stand for and what direction well head this country in.
The Elephant Logo dates to the 1870?s and which symbolizes that the GOP never forgets but much has been said about the fact the stars on the GOP logo are up-side down and many believe its thinly veiled satanic symbolism. The new GOP logo is supposed to represent the coming of a new day, looking forward to bright future. We asked Brad Mathers and his partner Sergio who own an art boutique in downtown Seattle their thoughts and they said, we were quite impressed when they unfurled their proud red cock logo here in Seattle at the Newt for President headquarters across the street from our boutique, we were just wowed at how enormous and stunning it was, Sergio couldnt believe it, the Newt people must really love their proud red cock. Us Democrats really need a new and robust logo as well, perhaps something like a stallion or a majestic owl with its wings stretched.
We caught up with Newt Gingrich and asked him what his thoughts were and his reply was, as you can see Im wearing my proud red cock and I hate to take credit but I recommended the proud red cock logo during the Clinton years but we got side tracked by the Lewinsky scandal and President Clintons infidelity and the impeachment process. I recommended it back then because I felt portrayed the values that the party stood for and it portrays my personal values. We asked the Romney Campaign for a comment but Gov. Romney declined to comment due to the fact that because of his Mormon upbringing he prefers to call the new GOP logo the rooster thingy.
http://www.freewoodpost.com/2012/01/26/gop-changes-party-logo-to-a-proud-red-cock-the-symbol-of-a-new-dawn/
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)It is not abortion, it is not sexual preference, it is not sexual freedom. The real immorality is demeaning a whole group of people by referring to them as equal to their sex organs.
MelungeonWoman
(502 posts)which was then cleaned up by a staffer. Are there people who actually refer to women as vaginas?
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)You are spot on.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)Shadowflash
(1,536 posts)As that's the only thing Rethuglicans see when they look at women.
tanyev
(42,552 posts)Good one.
City Lights
(25,171 posts)Sounds like a real gem.
toby jo
(1,269 posts)I wonder that no men in his party had anything to say.
His original response was basically 'fu'. But eventually he offered a lame apology.
Dirty stuff considering that NH is pretty progressive.
Liberalynn
(7,549 posts)I know your question was rhetorical. The Pukes misogyny is one of the main reasons I am a Democrat.
ZRT2209
(1,357 posts)Mopar151
(9,982 posts)Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)What DO these Republicans get up to on vacation?
TygrBright
(20,758 posts)But I can still enjoy the hell out of watching a dick be a dick in the full glare of publicity.
appreciatively,
Bright
olddad56
(5,732 posts)smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)struggle4progress
(118,280 posts)VA_Jill
(9,965 posts)a DICK.
Response to onehandle (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
DURHAM D
(32,609 posts)Welcome back. NOT
leftyladyfrommo
(18,868 posts)It is simply mind boggling.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)What a dick!!!!!!!!!!!!
olddad56
(5,732 posts)Beacool
(30,247 posts)I hadn't noticed. Well, then it's even more appropriate.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)This was during last year's hatefest on the ladies.
The GOP needs to issue a clear statement on who can and can not use that word.
Please educate us, peabrains.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)Some act as if births were immaculate conceptions. Don't these maroons have wives, girlfriends or daughters who can educate them?
Geez..............
Locut0s
(6,154 posts)Just so childish and immature it's like something a naughty 5 year old might say.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)He said vagina......he, he, he.
Sophomoric humor.
Hekate
(90,648 posts)Jeez.