North Korea states 'nuclear war is unavoidable' as it declares first target will be Japan
Source: Express (UK)
In a commentary carried by the Korean Central News Agency (KCNA), the communist country lashed out at Tokyo's standing orders to destroy any missile heading toward Japan, threatening such actions will result in a nuclear attack against the island nation.
If Japan executes its threat to shoot down any North Korean missile, such a provocative intervention would see Tokyo an enormous conurbation of 30 million people consumed in nuclear flames, KCNA warned.
Japan is always in the cross-hairs of our revolutionary army and if Japan makes a slightest move, the spark of war will touch Japan first, the report added.
<snip>
The Korean Peninsula has "been reduced to the biggest nuclear hotspot in the world", the North said in more fiery rhetoric today, "making the outbreak of a nuclear war on this land unavoidable."
<snip>
Read more: http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/391376/North-Korea-states-nuclear-war-is-unavoidable-as-it-declares-first-target-will-be-Japan
warrprayer
(4,734 posts)stone crazy
iandhr
(6,852 posts)But North Korea threatens to use nukes on a daily basis. I am wondering what intel there is that suggests that this is more then the usual threats.
defacto7
(13,485 posts)Much more so. It seems pretty clear. That is if he really is the controlling voice he seems to be.
Babel_17
(5,400 posts)That gives them more range, and it is provocative.
David__77
(23,219 posts)He focused on the Non-Aligned Movement and was restrained by needing aid from the Soviet Union. N. Korea has more leverage over China than it had over the Soviet Union. China needs N. Korea to remain as it is as a matter of national security.
Ter
(4,281 posts)Or did a general or something say it? I have yet to see a quote by Kim himself saying something like this.
bunnies
(15,859 posts)What a fuckwit.
olddad56
(5,732 posts)bunnies
(15,859 posts)we'll all already be collateral damage. Anything else is just fuel to the great big asinine fire, I'd think.
premium
(3,731 posts)time for this one to go.......................
And one second after Japan was hit, N. Korea would no longer exist.
PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)oh but thats how all mass murderers go isn't it. whether it's a Bushmaster or a nuclear tipped missile.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)That's how it'll turn out if this keeps going.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)says they are too big to exist. I would guess that there are a bunch of countries who think this ruler is to crazy to exist. And those countries include his closest neighbors. If he has any sense he should be afraid.
dlwickham
(3,316 posts)and I think it's true
AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)For all their bluster of being Rivals of the United States, Russia & China sure seem nervous about Kim going insane. How long until someone finally DOES step in and take control?
gcomeau
(5,764 posts)While it's tempting to just call for someone to drop a cruise missile on Un and get it over with, what might be more effective is to hack their central news agency broadcast feed and just send a message visible to the entire country rather contemptuously telling their dear leader to grow up and stop bothering the adults in the rest of the world because he's just getting annoying now... and when he feels like acting like a big boy then he can come play with the rest of the countries but we all really have better things to do than stop by and spank him because he's misbehaving... and we now return you to your regularly scheduled broadcast of ridiculous nonsense.
The leadership might all keel over from collective strokes. Who knows?
Crowman1979
(3,844 posts)...North Korea's gulags.
Renew Deal
(81,801 posts)a measure of success, and "stuff."
XemaSab
(60,212 posts)Maybe just show them a month of South Korean television.
Renew Deal
(81,801 posts)ConcernedCanuk
(13,509 posts).
.
.
in the Middle East and Europe.
I think they are using North Korea to create a major presence on China's doorstep.
In my opinion, USA is just itching to bomb the shit out of another small country.
CC
valerief
(53,235 posts)(People Who Don't Matter)
Renew Deal
(81,801 posts)So unless you're suggesting that North Korea is colluding with the US to create a crisis, your post makes no sense.
ConcernedCanuk
(13,509 posts).
.
.
well, what the heck is this??
that ain't no "embassy" - it's a damm FORT!
"The embassy compound is by far the largest the world has ever seen, at one and a half square miles, big enough for 94 football fields. It cost three quarters of a billion dollars to build (coming in about $150 million over budget). Inside its high walls, guard towers and machine-gun emplacements lie not just the embassy itself, but more than 20 other buildings, including residential quarters, a gym and swimming pool, commercial facilities, a power station and a water-treatment plant."
SOURCE:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/16/us-embassy-iraq-state-department-plan_n_965945.html
CC
AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)At least we're under President Obama and not Romney.....Mittens might actually do just that!
SkyDaddy7
(6,045 posts)In today's technological environment the USA is already in China's living room Japan, South Korea, Afghanistan, subs all along the China coast, airplanes in the sky all along China's coast & top secret satellites with who only knows what capabilities...Taking North Korea would not change anything.
defacto7
(13,485 posts)I see the possible surprise that China could takes out NK. China has the most to loose if SK or Japan is attacked or if the US or other peninsula countries occupy or even just destabilize the DPRK.
premium
(3,731 posts)that may be why the Chinese military is massing at the N. Korean border, if China determines that little Un is going to jump, they may take action and remove this lunatic before he causes mass destruction.
MFM008
(19,776 posts)And what a disturbing novel that is. I thought China may have to step in here.
KJU needs his butt kicked in a terminal way and not with nukes.
CHINA world needs a little help here.
octothorpe
(962 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Just the thought of it...
charlie and algernon
(13,447 posts)The Japanese have got to be thinking "WHAT. THE. FUCK!?"
I'm starting to think that someone's not going to wait around for those missiles and will launch a preemptive strike. We like to think that Japan and South Korea won't do anything without the US' blessing, but the US isn't the one that could get nuked. Either one could take action whether or not they get the OK from the US.
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)Iliyah
(25,111 posts)Kim J Un knows that America will protect Japan. Anyways, there should be one Korea with tendencies like SK.
Babel_17
(5,400 posts)I think the informal rules regarding rants from dictators is that you only get to dominate the world stage for one week before risking being taken seriously and having ones bluff called.
No one in the uppermost NK hierarchy is dissuading him from continuing because they are ok with a serious confrontation as that will mean Kim Jong-un will lose face and it will then be safe to remove his control.
Presumably we have much more insightful people then me interpreting events though. I suggest the above because if it were true there wouldn't be talk of it. Our officials talking of it would burn that bridge.
Moostache
(9,895 posts)Public humiliation of him will only lead to a launch.
He is clearly not what he claims to be to his people (an incarnate god and avatar of his grandfather) and that is causing the problem. Inside NK, people are no doubt in a state of major conflict - their state media feeds them the propaganda, but the empty suit being propped up is actually dumber than W. and less charismatic than candidate Gore...that would create some serious cognitive dissonance for sure.
As a result, Un feels the only way out of this trap for himself is brinksmanship and walking right up to the line of total annihilation if necessary, and if he is going to go out, he has no problem taking a few million people with him. Every sniper in Asia should be on contract to take this guy out at any opportunity.
defacto7
(13,485 posts)to see Un as a megalomaniac, but he sure is acting like one... or they are. If so, then illogical acts of war that are catastrophic to all sides including their own is not off the table. Crazy is as crazy says.
premium
(3,731 posts)him or the Generals? And that could be a dangerous situation.
mahatmakanejeeves
(56,896 posts)Are these the same people sending me spam?
charlie and algernon
(13,447 posts)Duer 157099
(17,742 posts)we have our own, been there, done that.
Just get rid of the leader.
telclaven
(235 posts)My only question to you is
HOW?
Duer 157099
(17,742 posts)Then I'm not gonna tell you.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)Given that the military elites have wealth and privilege and repress the population through utter and complete terror it's unlikely to say the least that he is going to be got rid of.
jpak
(41,742 posts)yup
I'm thinking that the second target would be Pyongyang.
gordianot
(15,226 posts)Modern Nuclear weapons today are a far cry from the dirty bombs of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Nuclear war is suicidal. Even if it does not explode Plutonium is the deadliest substance on Earth and may well be more dangerous as a dust cloud. At the height of the cold war such threats were largely implied. Ronald Reagan got caught (joking) about pushing the button and literally scared the crap out of everyone. Some have speculated that episode contributed to the end of the cold war, it takes one trigger happy idiot.
North Korean suicide will not be painless.
Poll_Blind
(23,864 posts)PB
Orsino
(37,428 posts)Damned translators.
PearliePoo2
(7,768 posts)So...Japan has standing orders that they will shoot down any missile coming their way, but Kim "dumb-ass" Un says if you shoot down our missile we have targeted you with, we will consider that "provocative" behavior and we will nuke Tokyo.
Has he OD'd on bad Kimchee?? WTF indeed!
Soundman
(297 posts)The trajectory will take it over Japan. I believe they are talking about responding to the interception of a peacefull test fire of a medium/long range missile.
Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)pampango
(24,692 posts)There are two ways the security council can proceed. One is emollient: give North Korea what, behind all the bluster, it really wants, namely readmission to the NPT as the sixth (or seventh, behind India) nuclear weapon power. That has already been rejected by John Kerry, and would be resisted by other states. It may, however, be the only way, short of military force, to restrain this impossible state. Readmission to the NPT with that status would at least impose on it an eventual duty to disarm (albeit a duty on which, without invasive IAEA inspections, it might cheat).
The other option is to treat North Korea's threat of nuclear war as a crime against humanity, and to refer its behaviour to the international criminal court prosecutor for investigation and potential indictment of Kim Jong-un and his generals.
Using or threatening to use nuclear weapons was declared a crime against humanity by the UN in 1984, while in 1996 the international court of justice ruled that "the threat or use of nuclear weapons would generally be contrary to the rules of (international) law", other than in "extreme circumstances of self-defence", which do not apply to North Korea's current threats of first use.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/apr/07/north-korea-case-to-the-hague
I do not know that Kim ever leaves NK, but this may be a useful diplomatic strategy short of military action. I did not know that threatening to use nuclear weapons is a 'crime against humanity'. I'm glad that it is, just did not know that it has been so determined.
John2
(2,730 posts)North Korea and their desire to build a nuclear deterrence does not begin in 1994 and neither does their animosity with Japan. They are still technically at War with every country stated. They are acting no different than China or Russia when they built their nuclear deterrence. Kim is not the first leader to threaten the use of nuclear weapons or even the first that have used them on civilians. If you want to call it a crime, then you need to go back further. He want be the first to seek or is presently seeking delivery systems for them either. Has Japan ever apologized or payed for their War crimes in Korea?
pampango
(24,692 posts)threatening a 'first use' of nuclear weapons (as opposed to having the capability to retaliate) is such a crime.
While it may be satisfying to go back and prosecute those who used or threatened to use nuclear weapons as a 'first strike' before the UN declared it to be a 'crime against humanity', it would only be useful against leaders who are still alive. Prosecuting Truman for authorizing the atomic bombing of Japan - or any past leader of a nuclear-capable country who threatened a 'first use' - would result in 'show trials' since those responsible cannot be punished unless they are still alive. I suppose we could task the International Criminal Court with prosecuting dead people to make a point but that is a separate decision.
There have, of course, been many apologies by Japan to Korea, China and other countries. There is still plenty of controversy as to whether these apologies were sufficient. Japan did pay for its crimes in Korea. Whether that was sufficient is a subjective matter, as well.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_war_apology_statements_issued_by_Japan#Comments_clarifying_past_apologies
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_on_Basic_Relations_between_Japan_and_the_Republic_of_Korea
bananas
(27,509 posts)Using or threatening to use nuclear weapons was declared a crime against humanity by the UN in 1984, while in 1996 the international court of justice ruled that "the threat or use of nuclear weapons would generally be contrary to the rules of (international) law", other than in "extreme circumstances of self-defence", which do not apply to North Korea's current threats of first use.
A lot of people are unaware of this, that just threatening to use them is a war crime (with some extreme exceptions).
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)This little shit needs to go--he might be dear leader for 50+ years... Good god.
Igel
(35,196 posts)In the South, memories are still a bit raw from the Japanese occupation of Korea and the abuses meted out. Stories of young Korean women taken to Japan as sex workers were common not so long ago.
And that's the South, with fairly good relations with Japan. The North's leadership is vitriolically racist and xenophobic to an extreme--whether they actually believe it or just have this as their debate positions is meaningless. It's what they tell their own people. It's good for whipping up more nationalistic rally-round-the-flag jingoism and making the North Koreans the most important people with the most important country on Earth.
This kind of anti-Japanese rhetoric is common. We just don't pay attention and, as Americans, simply can't conceive of something happening that doesn't crucially make us the most important factor in that "something."
polly7
(20,582 posts)We're good until Monday.
APRIL 1, 2013
CITING EXHAUSTION, KIM JONG-UN TO STOP THREATENING WORLD ON WEEKENDS
POSTED BY ANDY BOROWITZ
PYONGYANG (The Borowitz Report)Saying that he could no longer keep up the punishing pace of sabre rattling seven days a week, North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un said today that beginning this month he will take weekends off from vowing to incinerate the world.
After the official Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) released a revised April Threat Schedule showing that Kims declarations of war and doomsday ultimatums would be limited to Monday through Friday, North Koreas Supreme Leader explained his decision to make his weekends threat-free: Dad always told me that you have to pace yourself in this job. The biggest danger isnt the United Statesits burnout.
Kim said that he made his decision over the past weekend, after he issued his forty-ninth official statement threatening to engulf the mainland U.S. in a nuclear Armageddon: I was in the middle of saying infernal sea of fire, and I kind of realized, hey, Im just phoning it in. And I never want to be that guy.
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/borowitzreport/2013/04/citing-exhaustion-kim-jong-un-to-stop-threatening-world-on-weekends.html?mbid=nl_Borowitz%20
Adam-Bomb
(90 posts)For the past week I've had this mental clock ticking down and
it's driving me crazy. It doesn't look like anyone's backing down.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)What an idiot.