Senate Votes 68-31 to Allow Debate on Gun Legislation
Source: New York Times
WASHINGTON The Senate on Thursday cleared the way for debate on the first piece of major gun-control legislation to be considered in that chamber in two decades.
With families of victims of the Newtown, Conn., massacre watching silently from the chamber, the Senate thwarted a threatened filibuster with a vote of 68 to 31 and will proceed next week to debate a package of legislation that would expand background checks for gun buyers and increase the penalties for criminal sales, in addition to a variety of other amendments. Those include the renewal of the assault weapons ban that expired in 2004.
Twenty-nine Republicans voted against the measure, as did two Democrats. Sixteen Republicans joined 52 Democrats in voting to cut off the debate.
Americans across this great country are looking to us for solutions and for action, said Senator Patrick Leahy, Democrat of Vermont and chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, not for filibustering or sloganeering.
Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/12/us/senate-votes-to-allow-debate-on-gun-bill.html
How generous of the GOPNRA to at least allow talk on what the vast majority of Americans, Gun Owners, and even NRA Members want.
iandhr
(6,852 posts)... a modicum of sanity?
Fingers crossed.
srican69
(1,426 posts)and that will never happen
onehandle
(51,122 posts)Iliyah
(25,111 posts)others who do the bidding of the NRA. It needs 60 votes. But alas, a debate is welcome. I'm pretty sure we will get an ear full of crazy talk tho.
flpoljunkie
(26,184 posts)flpoljunkie
(26,184 posts)No details.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)gun control law, not the actual voting which needs 60 votes to pass onto the FUCKED-UP house (GOP).
flpoljunkie
(26,184 posts)Sens. Mark Begich and Mark Pryor, both of whom are seeking re-election next year in Republican-leaning states, were the two Democrats who wanted to kill the bill in the cradle.
http://blogs.rollcall.com/hawkings/gun-bill-thwarted-debate-just-begins/
alp227
(32,015 posts)I recently heard Mark Levin dissing Graham as a non-conservative and even compare Graham to Arlen Specter! Media Matters has a clip from the Apr. 8 show that I recorded just to hear his views on Margaret Thatcher (since Levin worked in the Reagan White House).
According to Mediaite, 21 NRA A-rated senators voted to stop the filibuster.
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,166 posts)Deep13
(39,154 posts)sinkingfeeling
(51,444 posts)I'm not going to contribute or vote for him again.
flpoljunkie
(26,184 posts)We need him to be re-elected in 2014.
sinkingfeeling
(51,444 posts)the election of Obama, the population here has gone 'over the cliff'. They have turned to the Tea Party and cranked up the hate. I really hope to be out of here by the 2014 election.
flpoljunkie
(26,184 posts)Obama lost Begich's Alaska 41/55 to Rmoney. We need them both to be re-elected in 2014.
http://www.cnn.com/election/2012/results/main?hpt=hp_inthenews
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)reinterpret
then 100% no private person with bullets anywhere and guns
buyback for 21 days
then zero tolerance after the 21 day grace period
flpoljunkie
(26,184 posts)premium
(3,731 posts)he's serious.
He has this delusional dream that the SCOTUS is going to re-interpret the 2A and then all guns and bullets will be outlawed and everyone, including the criminals, will turn in their guns and bullets, there will be no more crime.
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)mwrguy
(3,245 posts)Get gun nuts off the streets as well.
NickB79
(19,233 posts)And we get to see the biggest GOP takeover since Reagan.
Shortly afterwards, the nation crumbles.
Like I've said before, your fantasy is something that neither of us will live to see, because short of a military coup, it will take generations for the changes you want to see to occur.
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)It's time to grow up
NickB79
(19,233 posts)Do you really think that, if guns were made illegal tomorrow and by some miracle they were all turned in, that their former owners wouldn't be pissed to beat hell? That even the millions of Democratic gun owners who just want to go shoot a few deer and ducks for the freezer each fall would just shrug their shoulders and start up a stamp collection? It would be a political bloodbath for the progressive party even in the best-case scenario.
This fantasy you've constructed and put so much effort into is so illogical that it just boggles the mind. It's like you don't even recognize that gun owners are US citizens and human beings the same as you, with all the voting rights and emotions that you have. I'd swear I've had more constructive discussions with my 3-yr old toddler.
But I'm the one who's supposed to grow up?
Mass
(27,315 posts)There will be a Motion to close debate before the vote. It will be interesting to see if it passes
florida08
(4,106 posts)Rubio voted nay. He's such a coward along with the other pro-plutocrats
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)We need to vote these MF**kers out! Thanks for the info!
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)This is oh so controversial is it not?....in one small place on the planet Earth. Everywhere else, literally, it's a no-brainer, but on the Hill it's a bite-your-nails, big-ominous-chord, report-every-moment trama-drama soap opera. 90-something percent want background checks.... c'mon guys! Jesus! It's not like we haven't had them before... and everything was alright.
Jennicut
(25,415 posts)We shall see. My Senators Murphy and Blumenthal will keep pushing this issue even if others in Congress eventually give up as this is a deeply personal issue for them. The Senate may vote to pass the eventual bill but the House is a mess.