Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,593 posts)
Wed Apr 10, 2013, 11:10 PM Apr 2013

Agents found 678 guns,13 grenades in raid of Lincoln man's home

Source: Omaha World Herald

By Maggie O'Brien

A Lincoln man is accused of illegally selling hundreds of guns — including some to convicted felons — out of his home.

Federal agents found 678 guns and 13 grenades when they raided the home of Ashley F. Gerbig last month, according to federal court documents unsealed this week.

The firearms included rifles, handguns and shotguns.

Agents from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms say Gerbig trafficked hundreds of guns from his residence.

FULL story at link.


Read more: http://www.omaha.com/article/20130410/NEWS/704119927/1685#agents-found-678-guns-13-grenades-in-raid-of-lincoln-man-s-home

32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Agents found 678 guns,13 grenades in raid of Lincoln man's home (Original Post) Omaha Steve Apr 2013 OP
That man should spend only one or two nights in jail. Loudly Apr 2013 #1
So? The Second Amendment says that's ok. onehandle Apr 2013 #2
Just an honest man trying to make a living! Obama the job killer! freshwest Apr 2013 #4
Obama's socialist, jackbooted gun confiscation has begun with drones and child indoctrination camps! freshwest Apr 2013 #3
Just heard what Washington is doing... Mr.Pain Apr 2013 #5
Well, grenades haven't been generally available to the public since at least 1934 AtheistCrusader Apr 2013 #6
I'm sure the guy in Lincoln thinks the same way. sinkingfeeling Apr 2013 #13
No wonder the stores have no ammo golfguru Apr 2013 #7
That fucking asshole has blood on his hands. SunSeeker Apr 2013 #8
what`s the problem? madrchsod Apr 2013 #9
Are you being sarcastic or serious? Paladin Apr 2013 #10
This is one of the NRA poster boys........ Historic NY Apr 2013 #11
He does not meet the legal definition of a private seller hack89 Apr 2013 #12
He can just say he bought those guns to fulfill his home defense needs. IveWornAHundredPants Apr 2013 #19
It was not the number of guns. It was what he was doing with them. hack89 Apr 2013 #22
His claim was that the guns were his own, and he was therefore free to sell them. IveWornAHundredPants Apr 2013 #24
Criminals will always say something other than "I am guilty". hack89 Apr 2013 #27
The same claim can be made of prescription pain meds NickB79 Apr 2013 #29
Well, maybe he needed them. After all, guns make the world a better, happy, wonderful place. valerief Apr 2013 #14
Or maybe he is simply a criminal running a criminal enterprise? nt hack89 Apr 2013 #15
We're not allowed to think of the obvious here in the great U.S. of A. nt valerief Apr 2013 #16
I had no problem doing it. nt hack89 Apr 2013 #17
That's because, like all the popgun enthusiasts here, IveWornAHundredPants Apr 2013 #20
I look at what he was doing with his guns and say "He's obviously a criminal" hack89 Apr 2013 #23
I guess my point is that he could claim to need all those guns for personal defense purposes IveWornAHundredPants Apr 2013 #25
Except the law is very explicit on what constitutes illegal gun dealing hack89 Apr 2013 #28
From another article on the story: Tommy_Carcetti Apr 2013 #18
How do you know he avoided background checks? hack89 Apr 2013 #30
Wouldn't really change my point. Tommy_Carcetti Apr 2013 #31
Certainly agree that the background check system needs to be strengthened. nt hack89 Apr 2013 #32
So-called law abiders are the ultimate source for illegal gun sales jpak Apr 2013 #21
Well, that's reasonable. bowens43 Apr 2013 #26
 

Loudly

(2,436 posts)
1. That man should spend only one or two nights in jail.
Wed Apr 10, 2013, 11:17 PM
Apr 2013

The important thing is that he was disarmed.

Peace little wacko, and out.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
3. Obama's socialist, jackbooted gun confiscation has begun with drones and child indoctrination camps!
Wed Apr 10, 2013, 11:52 PM
Apr 2013
Obama's Gun Grabbing Psyop Speech of Evil

On the Tuesday, April 9 edition of the Alex Jones Show, Alex tears apart the steadfast push to tamp down so-called "gun violence" as Obama once again parades the dead children of the Newtown tragedy for maximum emotional manipulation of the masses. Alex also breaks down the DHS audaciously testing surveillance drone technology that can detect whether or not a person is armed.

President Barack Obama traveled to Hartford, Connecticut on Monday and delivered a speech calling for a vote on the Second Amendment. He lashed out at Republicans who plan to resist attempts by Congress to destroy the right to bear firearms...


And don't miss the newest:

AFTER THE TRIBULATION DVD
The Pre-Tribulation Rapture Fraud Exposed


Satan is working behind the scenes to set up a one world government...


Go to youtube to see all the memes being played out this week...

Mr.Pain

(52 posts)
5. Just heard what Washington is doing...
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 12:37 AM
Apr 2013

More of the same BS. On the nightly news lawmakers are setting forth new regulations on gun purchases. Mandatory background checks, without the "gun show loophole". The Sandy Hook killer used guns that were in fact purchased by his mother, (whom he killed first), and I would bet she underwent the mandatory background check at the time(s) of purchase. Good ol' ineffective Washington politicians at work. Next they'll be telling us that government tyranny is impossible in the U.S. because the government is us.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
6. Well, grenades haven't been generally available to the public since at least 1934
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 01:02 AM
Apr 2013

yet the clown in the OP's story appears to have gotten some illegally.

Not sure what to do with that data point, but there it is.

SunSeeker

(51,550 posts)
8. That fucking asshole has blood on his hands.
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 02:40 AM
Apr 2013

If any of the guns he illegally sold end up being used to kill someone, he should be booked as accessory to murder.

madrchsod

(58,162 posts)
9. what`s the problem?
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 08:18 AM
Apr 2013

it`s america where the second amendment and the free enterprise system trumps any silly laws that would restrict guys like this from selling guns.

talk about anti-american!!!

Paladin

(28,252 posts)
10. Are you being sarcastic or serious?
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 08:32 AM
Apr 2013

It's an honest question, given some of the pro-gun sentiments that turn up on DU with depressing regularity.

Historic NY

(37,449 posts)
11. This is one of the NRA poster boys........
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 09:02 AM
Apr 2013

that they want to give cover for by allowing them to sidestep background checks....he is only a private seller.

If the GOP requires a piss test for welfare then they should require a complete background check to purchase a weapon.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
12. He does not meet the legal definition of a private seller
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 09:15 AM
Apr 2013

a private seller, for example, cannot acquire guns for the express purpose of selling them. Additionally, the sheer volume of sales takes him out of the private seller category.

This guy was a criminal running a criminal enterprise - he was breaking a slew of gun laws.

 
19. He can just say he bought those guns to fulfill his home defense needs.
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 11:23 AM
Apr 2013

There were popgun lovers here taking great umbrage at the idea that thirty or forty guns represented a "whopping" amount, or could possibly be more guns than one person needs.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
22. It was not the number of guns. It was what he was doing with them.
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 11:38 AM
Apr 2013

owning a shit ton of guns is not illegal. Running an unlicensed gun dealership is.



 
24. His claim was that the guns were his own, and he was therefore free to sell them.
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 11:43 AM
Apr 2013

I don't know if he's correct on that, but if the offense is that he acquired the guns with the intention of selling them, doesn't he just have to say "No, I bought them for home defense, and later decided to sell them"? Selling to known felons is a separate matter of course, but there, too, doesn't he just have to say "I didn't know they were felons"?

hack89

(39,171 posts)
27. Criminals will always say something other than "I am guilty".
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 12:13 PM
Apr 2013

This is what the law says:

The Gun Control Act of 1968 provides that persons “engaged in the business” of dealing in firearms must be licensed.3 Although Congress did not originally define the term “engaged in the business,” it did so in 1986 as part of the McClure-Volkmer Act (also known as the “Firearms Owners’ Protection Act”). That Act defined the term “engaged in the business,” as applied to a firearms dealer, as “a person who devotes time, attention, and labor to dealing in firearms as a regular course of trade or business with the principal objective of livelihood and profit through the repetitive purchase and resale of firearms.”4


If the state can show a pattern of gun purchases and sales then he broke the law.

He can make any legal defense he wants - he just has to convince a jury.


The ATF is saying he knew he was selling to felons. Because it was a sting operation, it could be as simple as the undercover buyer saying he was a felon but needed a gun. If they have it on tape then he is dead meat.

NickB79

(19,233 posts)
29. The same claim can be made of prescription pain meds
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 03:02 PM
Apr 2013

It still fails in court. Just because you own them does not give you the right to do whatever you want with them, or sell them to those legally barred from owning them.

Also, owning live hand grenades without a shitload of paperwork on file with the ATF is a serious felony no matter what you intend to do with them.

valerief

(53,235 posts)
14. Well, maybe he needed them. After all, guns make the world a better, happy, wonderful place.
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 10:18 AM
Apr 2013

Don't they? That's what the gungeoneers tell me.

 
20. That's because, like all the popgun enthusiasts here,
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 11:29 AM
Apr 2013

you possess a completely unwarranted confidence in where the line between rational and irrational gun ownership lies. To you, it's exactly just past the point at which you yourself want to be. All the gun control regulations you support are those which won't cause you personally any trouble; anything else is outrageous gun-grabbing.

So you look at this guy and say "He's obviously a criminal, having so many guns!" But he looks like any other gun owner to the rest of us. He could justify his collection in just the same language so many of your "responsible gun owners" use to defend theirs.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
23. I look at what he was doing with his guns and say "He's obviously a criminal"
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 11:42 AM
Apr 2013

every other gun owner does not deliberately break the law and run an illegal gun dealership out of their garage.

I support all proposed gun control laws with the exception of the AWB and registration. I live in a state with universal background checks.

 
25. I guess my point is that he could claim to need all those guns for personal defense purposes
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 11:46 AM
Apr 2013

and sport shooting needs, and in the insane gun culture of the USA, people would be forced to at least consider taking that at face value. That's the sad part, to me.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
28. Except the law is very explicit on what constitutes illegal gun dealing
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 12:15 PM
Apr 2013

he can claim anything he wants. No reasonable person would believe him.

Tommy_Carcetti

(43,174 posts)
18. From another article on the story:
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 11:17 AM
Apr 2013
http://journalstar.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/atf-seizes-firearms-from-lincoln-man-s-home/article_dca44bc9-80e1-520e-89b6-38b32245222a.html

"Gerbig told the man he bought and sold guns online and at gun shows."

So if that was indeed the case, it sounds like he was able to amass the arsenal by finding legal ways to avoid the background check. Interesting.

Goes to show that even most "illegal" guns can have legal origins, and that the gun lobby's argument that gun violence is a result of illegal guns is a matter of diversion on their part.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
30. How do you know he avoided background checks?
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 03:43 PM
Apr 2013

Many gun shows require background checks and any internet sale that crosses state lines has to go through a FFL.

Background checks are not a deterrent to buying a lot of weapons - remember there is no permanent record created by a background check.

Tommy_Carcetti

(43,174 posts)
31. Wouldn't really change my point.
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 03:46 PM
Apr 2013

Which is that the guns were purchased legally. And, more disturbingly, en masse.

If anything, it would only show the need for more extensive background checks, and a warning system if someone is suspiciously purchasing large numbers of firearms in a short amount of time.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Agents found 678 guns,13 ...