Agents found 678 guns,13 grenades in raid of Lincoln man's home
Source: Omaha World Herald
By Maggie O'Brien
A Lincoln man is accused of illegally selling hundreds of guns including some to convicted felons out of his home.
Federal agents found 678 guns and 13 grenades when they raided the home of Ashley F. Gerbig last month, according to federal court documents unsealed this week.
The firearms included rifles, handguns and shotguns.
Agents from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms say Gerbig trafficked hundreds of guns from his residence.
FULL story at link.
Read more: http://www.omaha.com/article/20130410/NEWS/704119927/1685#agents-found-678-guns-13-grenades-in-raid-of-lincoln-man-s-home
Loudly
(2,436 posts)The important thing is that he was disarmed.
Peace little wacko, and out.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)Ayn Rand's rotting skull told me so.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)On the Tuesday, April 9 edition of the Alex Jones Show, Alex tears apart the steadfast push to tamp down so-called "gun violence" as Obama once again parades the dead children of the Newtown tragedy for maximum emotional manipulation of the masses. Alex also breaks down the DHS audaciously testing surveillance drone technology that can detect whether or not a person is armed.
President Barack Obama traveled to Hartford, Connecticut on Monday and delivered a speech calling for a vote on the Second Amendment. He lashed out at Republicans who plan to resist attempts by Congress to destroy the right to bear firearms...
And don't miss the newest:
AFTER THE TRIBULATION DVD
The Pre-Tribulation Rapture Fraud Exposed
Satan is working behind the scenes to set up a one world government...
Go to youtube to see all the memes being played out this week...
Mr.Pain
(52 posts)More of the same BS. On the nightly news lawmakers are setting forth new regulations on gun purchases. Mandatory background checks, without the "gun show loophole". The Sandy Hook killer used guns that were in fact purchased by his mother, (whom he killed first), and I would bet she underwent the mandatory background check at the time(s) of purchase. Good ol' ineffective Washington politicians at work. Next they'll be telling us that government tyranny is impossible in the U.S. because the government is us.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)yet the clown in the OP's story appears to have gotten some illegally.
Not sure what to do with that data point, but there it is.
sinkingfeeling
(51,445 posts)golfguru
(4,987 posts)it has been all bought up by horders.
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)If any of the guns he illegally sold end up being used to kill someone, he should be booked as accessory to murder.
madrchsod
(58,162 posts)it`s america where the second amendment and the free enterprise system trumps any silly laws that would restrict guys like this from selling guns.
talk about anti-american!!!
Paladin
(28,252 posts)It's an honest question, given some of the pro-gun sentiments that turn up on DU with depressing regularity.
Historic NY
(37,449 posts)that they want to give cover for by allowing them to sidestep background checks....he is only a private seller.
If the GOP requires a piss test for welfare then they should require a complete background check to purchase a weapon.
hack89
(39,171 posts)a private seller, for example, cannot acquire guns for the express purpose of selling them. Additionally, the sheer volume of sales takes him out of the private seller category.
This guy was a criminal running a criminal enterprise - he was breaking a slew of gun laws.
IveWornAHundredPants
(237 posts)There were popgun lovers here taking great umbrage at the idea that thirty or forty guns represented a "whopping" amount, or could possibly be more guns than one person needs.
hack89
(39,171 posts)owning a shit ton of guns is not illegal. Running an unlicensed gun dealership is.
IveWornAHundredPants
(237 posts)I don't know if he's correct on that, but if the offense is that he acquired the guns with the intention of selling them, doesn't he just have to say "No, I bought them for home defense, and later decided to sell them"? Selling to known felons is a separate matter of course, but there, too, doesn't he just have to say "I didn't know they were felons"?
hack89
(39,171 posts)This is what the law says:
If the state can show a pattern of gun purchases and sales then he broke the law.
He can make any legal defense he wants - he just has to convince a jury.
The ATF is saying he knew he was selling to felons. Because it was a sting operation, it could be as simple as the undercover buyer saying he was a felon but needed a gun. If they have it on tape then he is dead meat.
NickB79
(19,233 posts)It still fails in court. Just because you own them does not give you the right to do whatever you want with them, or sell them to those legally barred from owning them.
Also, owning live hand grenades without a shitload of paperwork on file with the ATF is a serious felony no matter what you intend to do with them.
valerief
(53,235 posts)Don't they? That's what the gungeoneers tell me.
hack89
(39,171 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)IveWornAHundredPants
(237 posts)you possess a completely unwarranted confidence in where the line between rational and irrational gun ownership lies. To you, it's exactly just past the point at which you yourself want to be. All the gun control regulations you support are those which won't cause you personally any trouble; anything else is outrageous gun-grabbing.
So you look at this guy and say "He's obviously a criminal, having so many guns!" But he looks like any other gun owner to the rest of us. He could justify his collection in just the same language so many of your "responsible gun owners" use to defend theirs.
hack89
(39,171 posts)every other gun owner does not deliberately break the law and run an illegal gun dealership out of their garage.
I support all proposed gun control laws with the exception of the AWB and registration. I live in a state with universal background checks.
IveWornAHundredPants
(237 posts)and sport shooting needs, and in the insane gun culture of the USA, people would be forced to at least consider taking that at face value. That's the sad part, to me.
hack89
(39,171 posts)he can claim anything he wants. No reasonable person would believe him.
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,174 posts)"Gerbig told the man he bought and sold guns online and at gun shows."
So if that was indeed the case, it sounds like he was able to amass the arsenal by finding legal ways to avoid the background check. Interesting.
Goes to show that even most "illegal" guns can have legal origins, and that the gun lobby's argument that gun violence is a result of illegal guns is a matter of diversion on their part.
hack89
(39,171 posts)Many gun shows require background checks and any internet sale that crosses state lines has to go through a FFL.
Background checks are not a deterrent to buying a lot of weapons - remember there is no permanent record created by a background check.
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,174 posts)Which is that the guns were purchased legally. And, more disturbingly, en masse.
If anything, it would only show the need for more extensive background checks, and a warning system if someone is suspiciously purchasing large numbers of firearms in a short amount of time.
hack89
(39,171 posts)jpak
(41,757 posts)yup