Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,005 posts)
Wed Apr 10, 2013, 01:34 PM Apr 2013

Obama unveils $3.78 trillion spending plan

Source: Washington Post

President Obama unveiled a 10-year budget blueprint Wednesday that calls for nearly $300 billion in new spending on jobs, public works and expanded pre-school education and nearly $800 billion in new taxes, including an extra 94 cents a pack on cigarettes.

But the president’s spending plan would also cut more than $1 trillion from programs across the federal government — for the first time targeting Social Security benefits — in an effort to persuade congressional Republicans to join him in finishing the job of debt reduction they started two years ago.

“Our economy is poised for progress, as long as Washington doesn’t get in the way,” Obama said in announcing his budget plan in the White House Rose Garden. He said his budget represents “a fiscally responsible blueprint for middle-class jobs and growth.”

He said his fiscal year 2014 budget replaces “the foolish across-the-board spending cuts” known as the sequester that are “already hurting our economy.” The plan reduces the deficit and makes necessary investments “because we can do both,” he said. “We can grow our economy, and shrink our deficits.” He added: “The numbers work. There’s not a lot of smoke and mirrors in here.”

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/obama-to-unveil-377-trillion-spending-plan/2013/04/10/843adef4-a18d-11e2-82bc-511538ae90a4_singlePage.html

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama unveils $3.78 trillion spending plan (Original Post) alp227 Apr 2013 OP
Taking away the poorly considered adjustments to Social Security... ellisonz Apr 2013 #1
Those last two paragraphs? Dryvinwhileblind Apr 2013 #2
I second everything you said newfie11 Apr 2013 #4
+ a gazillion. forestpath Apr 2013 #7
Good by O for A no more money from me. upaloopa Apr 2013 #3
We NEED to Raise Taxes Macoy51 Apr 2013 #5
You are guilty of plagerism. lol Auntie Bush Apr 2013 #12
Mmmm, no Macoy51 Apr 2013 #13
OK...excect all the rest is Republican. Auntie Bush Apr 2013 #14
he should worry about doing something that does`t keep pissing off the democrats. madrchsod Apr 2013 #6
Obama cares about kids. Why doesn't he care about seniors starving? He's like a pro-lifer who forestpath Apr 2013 #8
Obama doesn't give a damn about seniors. avaistheone1 Apr 2013 #10
The Obama Budget Drains Tax Breaks for Big Oil pampango Apr 2013 #9
When Obama said Change, he meant a noun, not a verb. blkmusclmachine Apr 2013 #11

ellisonz

(27,711 posts)
1. Taking away the poorly considered adjustments to Social Security...
Wed Apr 10, 2013, 01:39 PM
Apr 2013

...there are things to like in this budget. I expect that measure to die in the Congress along with some of the more strident tax increases. In fact, I think it's 50-50 at best that this proposal is DOA.

On to 2014!

Dryvinwhileblind

(153 posts)
2. Those last two paragraphs?
Wed Apr 10, 2013, 02:01 PM
Apr 2013

Just who in the blue fuck is THIS frog? Not the Man I voted for, twice! For what it's worth, and with respects, I'm DONE with third way Democratic party bullshit, The People sold out daily, on all levels of government, to the highest bidder(s). I've voted straight Democratic tickets from 1976, through 2012. No longer. Never again. Good riddance, and until their minds come to 'em, FKM!

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
3. Good by O for A no more money from me.
Wed Apr 10, 2013, 02:02 PM
Apr 2013

I saw a 2012 video were Obama said he would not offer to cut SS benefits.
But he goes ahead and does it after I gave a good chunk of dough to his campaign. I wish I had that money back.

 

Macoy51

(239 posts)
5. We NEED to Raise Taxes
Wed Apr 10, 2013, 02:35 PM
Apr 2013

I am all in favor of the new taxes. I am less than thrilled with the billions more of new spending. Let’s fund our current programs first, before we go looking for new ways to spend money. We do have a spending problem and not every good idea is going to be affordable as a Federal program.

In fact, I would love for every new program proposed would have to list what current program would be killed to fund the new.



Macoy

 

Macoy51

(239 posts)
13. Mmmm, no
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 06:43 AM
Apr 2013

Correct me if I am wrong, but I thought Republicans wanted to cut both taxes and spending? I want to cut new spending, and RAISE taxes.



Macoy

Auntie Bush

(17,528 posts)
14. OK...excect all the rest is Republican.
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 04:31 PM
Apr 2013

" I am less than thrilled with the billions more of new spending. Let’s fund our current programs first, before we go looking for new ways to spend money. We do have a spending problem and not every good idea is going to be affordable as a Federal program.

In fact, I would love for every new program proposed would have to list what current program would be killed to fund the new."

That last paragraph is especially Rethug thinking/reasoning.

We need to spend now to help create jobs and we definitely need our infrastructure drastically improved. As people get jobs our debt will decrease...as it did in the Clinton years.

madrchsod

(58,162 posts)
6. he should worry about doing something that does`t keep pissing off the democrats.
Wed Apr 10, 2013, 02:54 PM
Apr 2013

after all the next election cycle is coming up and as far as i can tell it`s not going to be good for the democrats in the house and senate. if this happens he might as well go on vacation.

so let`s not worry about ten years from now. let`s worry about how many americans can get a job,have food and shelter,and have access to healthcare.

 

forestpath

(3,102 posts)
8. Obama cares about kids. Why doesn't he care about seniors starving? He's like a pro-lifer who
Wed Apr 10, 2013, 03:28 PM
Apr 2013

doesn't care about fetuses after they're born, only in this case he doesn't care about people when they get old.

 

avaistheone1

(14,626 posts)
10. Obama doesn't give a damn about seniors.
Wed Apr 10, 2013, 03:50 PM
Apr 2013

It is something I have observed throughout his candidacy and his presidency.

the life and welfare of seniors are not his concern.



pampango

(24,692 posts)
9. The Obama Budget Drains Tax Breaks for Big Oil
Wed Apr 10, 2013, 03:37 PM
Apr 2013

President Barack Obama’s budget proposal for fiscal year 2014 would eliminate $39 billion of special tax breaks for Big Oil companies over the next decade as part of comprehensive business tax reform. These companies earned billions of dollars in recent years due to high oil and gasoline prices and do not need additional support from taxpayers. These tax breaks emerged over the past 100 years to help the then-nascent industry develop, and they relieved the oil and gas industry of $466 billion in tax payments to the federal treasury between 1918 through 2009, according to DBL Investors. Now that the oil and gas industry is fully developed and mature, President Obama’s budget would end this century of largesse.

The five largest oil companies—BP, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, ExxonMobil, and Shell—earned a combined total of $255 billion in 2011 and 2012, largely a result of higher oil prices. Meanwhile, these companies are producing less oil, have $72 billion in cash reserves, and are using one-quarter of their profits to buy back their own stock to enrich their largest shareholders. (see Table 1) Reuters reported last year that Chevron, ConocoPhillips, and ExxonMobil—the three largest American oil companies—paid half or less of the standard corporate tax rate. President Obama’s budget recognizes that oil companies no longer need tax relief.



In contrast, the House of Representatives would continue to provide tax subsidies for one of the richest industries in the world. It passed an FY 2014 budget authored by Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) that retains these existing special tax preferences and provides yet another tax break on top of them. What’s more, the House budget cuts the corporate tax rate by nearly one-third, which would provide more than $2 billion annually in additional tax relief to the five largest oil companies.

The House-passed Ryan budget would keep existing special tax breaks and give Big Oil additional tax cuts, while also slicing vital middle-class programs, including education, science, and infrastructure. Meanwhile, President Obama’s proposal to eliminate $40 billion of special tax breaks for Big Oil as part of comprehensive business tax reform would make the tax code more fair.

http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/budget/news/2013/04/10/60090/the-obama-budget-drains-tax-breaks-for-big-oil/

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Obama unveils $3.78 trill...