Obama unveils $3.78 trillion spending plan
Source: Washington Post
President Obama unveiled a 10-year budget blueprint Wednesday that calls for nearly $300 billion in new spending on jobs, public works and expanded pre-school education and nearly $800 billion in new taxes, including an extra 94 cents a pack on cigarettes.
But the presidents spending plan would also cut more than $1 trillion from programs across the federal government for the first time targeting Social Security benefits in an effort to persuade congressional Republicans to join him in finishing the job of debt reduction they started two years ago.
Our economy is poised for progress, as long as Washington doesnt get in the way, Obama said in announcing his budget plan in the White House Rose Garden. He said his budget represents a fiscally responsible blueprint for middle-class jobs and growth.
He said his fiscal year 2014 budget replaces the foolish across-the-board spending cuts known as the sequester that are already hurting our economy. The plan reduces the deficit and makes necessary investments because we can do both, he said. We can grow our economy, and shrink our deficits. He added: The numbers work. Theres not a lot of smoke and mirrors in here.
Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/obama-to-unveil-377-trillion-spending-plan/2013/04/10/843adef4-a18d-11e2-82bc-511538ae90a4_singlePage.html
ellisonz
(27,711 posts)...there are things to like in this budget. I expect that measure to die in the Congress along with some of the more strident tax increases. In fact, I think it's 50-50 at best that this proposal is DOA.
On to 2014!
Dryvinwhileblind
(153 posts)Just who in the blue fuck is THIS frog? Not the Man I voted for, twice! For what it's worth, and with respects, I'm DONE with third way Democratic party bullshit, The People sold out daily, on all levels of government, to the highest bidder(s). I've voted straight Democratic tickets from 1976, through 2012. No longer. Never again. Good riddance, and until their minds come to 'em, FKM!
newfie11
(8,159 posts)This is NOT what I voted for and I am furious.
forestpath
(3,102 posts)upaloopa
(11,417 posts)I saw a 2012 video were Obama said he would not offer to cut SS benefits.
But he goes ahead and does it after I gave a good chunk of dough to his campaign. I wish I had that money back.
Macoy51
(239 posts)I am all in favor of the new taxes. I am less than thrilled with the billions more of new spending. Lets fund our current programs first, before we go looking for new ways to spend money. We do have a spending problem and not every good idea is going to be affordable as a Federal program.
In fact, I would love for every new program proposed would have to list what current program would be killed to fund the new.
Macoy
Auntie Bush
(17,528 posts)You copied Republican talking points verbatim.
Macoy51
(239 posts)Correct me if I am wrong, but I thought Republicans wanted to cut both taxes and spending? I want to cut new spending, and RAISE taxes.
Macoy
Auntie Bush
(17,528 posts)" I am less than thrilled with the billions more of new spending. Lets fund our current programs first, before we go looking for new ways to spend money. We do have a spending problem and not every good idea is going to be affordable as a Federal program.
In fact, I would love for every new program proposed would have to list what current program would be killed to fund the new."
That last paragraph is especially Rethug thinking/reasoning.
We need to spend now to help create jobs and we definitely need our infrastructure drastically improved. As people get jobs our debt will decrease...as it did in the Clinton years.
madrchsod
(58,162 posts)after all the next election cycle is coming up and as far as i can tell it`s not going to be good for the democrats in the house and senate. if this happens he might as well go on vacation.
so let`s not worry about ten years from now. let`s worry about how many americans can get a job,have food and shelter,and have access to healthcare.
forestpath
(3,102 posts)doesn't care about fetuses after they're born, only in this case he doesn't care about people when they get old.
avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)It is something I have observed throughout his candidacy and his presidency.
the life and welfare of seniors are not his concern.
pampango
(24,692 posts)President Barack Obamas budget proposal for fiscal year 2014 would eliminate $39 billion of special tax breaks for Big Oil companies over the next decade as part of comprehensive business tax reform. These companies earned billions of dollars in recent years due to high oil and gasoline prices and do not need additional support from taxpayers. These tax breaks emerged over the past 100 years to help the then-nascent industry develop, and they relieved the oil and gas industry of $466 billion in tax payments to the federal treasury between 1918 through 2009, according to DBL Investors. Now that the oil and gas industry is fully developed and mature, President Obamas budget would end this century of largesse.
The five largest oil companiesBP, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, ExxonMobil, and Shellearned a combined total of $255 billion in 2011 and 2012, largely a result of higher oil prices. Meanwhile, these companies are producing less oil, have $72 billion in cash reserves, and are using one-quarter of their profits to buy back their own stock to enrich their largest shareholders. (see Table 1) Reuters reported last year that Chevron, ConocoPhillips, and ExxonMobilthe three largest American oil companiespaid half or less of the standard corporate tax rate. President Obamas budget recognizes that oil companies no longer need tax relief.
In contrast, the House of Representatives would continue to provide tax subsidies for one of the richest industries in the world. It passed an FY 2014 budget authored by Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) that retains these existing special tax preferences and provides yet another tax break on top of them. Whats more, the House budget cuts the corporate tax rate by nearly one-third, which would provide more than $2 billion annually in additional tax relief to the five largest oil companies.
The House-passed Ryan budget would keep existing special tax breaks and give Big Oil additional tax cuts, while also slicing vital middle-class programs, including education, science, and infrastructure. Meanwhile, President Obamas proposal to eliminate $40 billion of special tax breaks for Big Oil as part of comprehensive business tax reform would make the tax code more fair.
http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/budget/news/2013/04/10/60090/the-obama-budget-drains-tax-breaks-for-big-oil/