Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Activists Claim Arkansas Oil Spill Diverted Into Wet Lands... (Original Post) busterbrown Apr 2013 OP
K&R DeSwiss Apr 2013 #1
I believe you mean the Freedom to Love America Clean Waterways Act. nt limpyhobbler Apr 2013 #3
Yes well.... DeSwiss Apr 2013 #5
Ark. Attorney General: "Of course there is oil in Lake Conway" limpyhobbler Apr 2013 #2
Diverting it to wetlands is no better. Horrible! glinda Apr 2013 #4
Diverting it to the wetlands is worse. summerschild Apr 2013 #13
exactly glinda Apr 2013 #15
Where Has The EPA Been On This? DallasNE Apr 2013 #6
Oil Spills are handled through the US Department of the Interior by way of the Minerals Management DhhD Apr 2013 #9
Thanks DallasNE Apr 2013 #11
No, probably not. The EPA has jurisdiction over wetlands if the lands in question meet the new byeya Apr 2013 #14
I put this together ashling Apr 2013 #7
People need to learn to keep criminals like Exxon, BP, Halliburton, etc. out of their communities Renew Deal Apr 2013 #8
Where is Holder on this bahrbearian Apr 2013 #10
"claim?" Evidence looks pretty concrete ffr Apr 2013 #12
 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
1. K&R
Sun Apr 7, 2013, 09:55 PM
Apr 2013
- I can sense ''The Exxon Protection Act'' being written as we speak.....


''...because a body of men, holding themselves accountable to nobody, ought not to be trusted by anybody....'' ~Thomas Paine, The Rights of Man
 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
5. Yes well....
Sun Apr 7, 2013, 10:05 PM
Apr 2013

...as long a Big Water approves it.




- Because at this point, that's where the cleanest water can be found these days.....


limpyhobbler

(8,244 posts)
2. Ark. Attorney General: "Of course there is oil in Lake Conway"
Sun Apr 7, 2013, 09:56 PM
Apr 2013

Of course there's oil in the lake. Why wouldn't there be oil in the lake?

http://www.katv.com/story/21889151/mcdaniel

summerschild

(725 posts)
13. Diverting it to the wetlands is worse.
Mon Apr 8, 2013, 12:45 AM
Apr 2013

It's easier to clean from streets than from swampy terrain/water.

Just to "hide" it? Dumb and makes it worse!

DallasNE

(7,402 posts)
6. Where Has The EPA Been On This?
Sun Apr 7, 2013, 10:13 PM
Apr 2013

Why haven't they given a deadline for a comprehensive clean-up plan from Exxon. A lot of that oil got down in the storm sewers and that means that those pipes will need to be dug up and dealt with, either steam scrubbed (depending on their condition) or replaced. Some of that footage showed oil on vegetation sticking out of the water but no obvious oil on the surface suggesting that the oil has sunk to the bottom. That means that Lake Conway will have to be lowered by several feet to allow dredging of the fouled wetlands. Cleanup will take a long, long time if it is done right.

DhhD

(4,695 posts)
9. Oil Spills are handled through the US Department of the Interior by way of the Minerals Management
Sun Apr 7, 2013, 10:44 PM
Apr 2013

Office. Oil companies have a manual on file for clean-up that has been approved by the Department. Persons having problems with health or property through air or other, would be under the EPA. What is the state or county plan for a hazardous spill out on the Interstate Highway?

In Texas, the EPA has backed off of the cleaning up after the 2005 hurricanes. Rick Perry wanted the EPA to leave Texas; they are leaving it alone. More privatization, less clean up, less clean water and clean air.

DallasNE

(7,402 posts)
11. Thanks
Sun Apr 7, 2013, 11:14 PM
Apr 2013

Wrong department but the same question. When was that manual last updated and does it include bitumen oil? While there would be overlap there are things that are unique as well. Just look at the outcome from that spill in Michigan -- still issues with the clean up effort after 2 years.

 

byeya

(2,842 posts)
14. No, probably not. The EPA has jurisdiction over wetlands if the lands in question meet the new
Mon Apr 8, 2013, 07:32 PM
Apr 2013

standards from the 2006 Supreme Court decision. I don't know about the wet lands in question here but I think it's appropriate for the EPA to push as hard as the agency can to monitor and direct the cleanup.
In other words, Do it until and unless a higher authority says you can't.

Renew Deal

(81,844 posts)
8. People need to learn to keep criminals like Exxon, BP, Halliburton, etc. out of their communities
Sun Apr 7, 2013, 10:29 PM
Apr 2013

Because all they do is poison the community and once that happens, it's over.

bahrbearian

(13,466 posts)
10. Where is Holder on this
Sun Apr 7, 2013, 10:56 PM
Apr 2013

Clearly those activist are breaking the law, those videos should not be public. They need to do a better job of protecting Exxon

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Activists Claim Arkansas ...