Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Robb

(39,665 posts)
Fri Apr 5, 2013, 02:02 PM Apr 2013

Man opens fire in two daycares; kills self, children safe

Last edited Fri Apr 5, 2013, 03:28 PM - Edit history (2)

Source: QMI

GATINEAU, Que. — A man is reported dead and a woman believed shot after a gunman fired inside two home daycares Friday morning in Gatineau, Que., on the other side of the river from Ottawa.

Police escorted frightened children from both daycares at 225 and 229 Gamelin St., near the Hull hospital.

No children or staff at the Racines de vie Montessori school were injured, say police.

Police say there were 53 children, all under the age of 5, at the daycares at the time.



Read more: http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Crime/2013/04/05/20714341.html



On edit: New story in USA Today: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2013/04/05/quebec-day-care-shooting/2057221/
47 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Man opens fire in two daycares; kills self, children safe (Original Post) Robb Apr 2013 OP
Dear Lord. Tommy_Carcetti Apr 2013 #1
Thank goodness the children were not harmed. Tx4obama Apr 2013 #2
... at least not physically etherealtruth Apr 2013 #27
Uggh Yo_Mama Apr 2013 #43
This never would have happened in Canada, where they have gun...control... Archae Apr 2013 #3
The perfect is the enemy of the good. Don't nix gun control just because it isn't perfect. nt Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2013 #4
I'm not. The point is gun control is not the cure-all I keep hearing of. Archae Apr 2013 #6
No? How many kids were killed? Robb Apr 2013 #7
So far as we know, none. AtheistCrusader Apr 2013 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Apr 2013 #14
I'm thrilled that no children were apparently shot. AtheistCrusader Apr 2013 #18
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Apr 2013 #21
Depends on what dimension of power you are looking at. AtheistCrusader Apr 2013 #29
Where do you keep hearing that it's a cure-all? drm604 Apr 2013 #15
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Apr 2013 #16
Yawn. AtheistCrusader Apr 2013 #19
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Apr 2013 #22
Sorry, physics is not for everyone. AtheistCrusader Apr 2013 #30
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Apr 2013 #31
Why? AtheistCrusader Apr 2013 #32
You can of course point us towards a post which specifically implies LanternWaste Apr 2013 #24
maybe not a cure all but maybe a cure some rurallib Apr 2013 #26
Who is saying gun control is a "cure-all"??? Martin Eden Apr 2013 #37
Who specifically told you gun control would prevent any and all gun-related deaths? LanternWaste Apr 2013 #47
Sure, and that is true. AtheistCrusader Apr 2013 #8
. baldguy Apr 2013 #13
Very funny! Pterodactyl Apr 2013 #46
Now they are saying there are two dead guys. DollarBillHines Apr 2013 #5
If only he had more guns, everything would have been all right. valerief Apr 2013 #10
Oh no shenmue Apr 2013 #11
"It's not like we are in the U.S. here, but we are told that everything is under control." Our Mnemosyne Apr 2013 #12
USA Today is reporting two men as well. Robb Apr 2013 #17
Shotgun, per ABC. Robb Apr 2013 #20
Here's a AP link too Tx4obama Apr 2013 #23
Phew obama2terms Apr 2013 #25
Arm the toddlers. Harden the nurseries. More and bigger guns are always the answer. leveymg Apr 2013 #28
The problem is not Guns formercia Apr 2013 #33
Assholes without guns are just assholes. QED. EOM. leveymg Apr 2013 #34
Really? CobblePuller Apr 2013 #36
Exception that proves the rule - 2/3 of homicides in American are gun murders leveymg Apr 2013 #40
"exception that proves the rule" is an oxymoron. CobblePuller Apr 2013 #41
"The exception [that] proves the rule" is a frequently misused English phrase. raccoon Apr 2013 #42
The more frequent contemporary usage is acceptable - an exception doesn't disprove the norm. leveymg Apr 2013 #44
If you found an exception to the law of gravity, would that prove the law of gravity? nt raccoon Apr 2013 #45
Kick n/t Tx4obama Apr 2013 #35
The posts in this thread are downright Pavlovian. (nt) Posteritatis Apr 2013 #38
sounds like murder, suicide? over personal problems. Sunlei Apr 2013 #39

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
2. Thank goodness the children were not harmed.
Fri Apr 5, 2013, 02:10 PM
Apr 2013

I remember after Newtown someone saying that in the future that a nursery/daycare probably be the next location we'd hear about,
well there it is.

Sounds like the gunman was probably targeting the woman and not the kids.


AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
9. So far as we know, none.
Fri Apr 5, 2013, 02:41 PM
Apr 2013

Not sure how that matters, given the opportunity was there, and it sounds like the shooter just didn't have kids on the menu.

Response to AtheistCrusader (Reply #9)

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
18. I'm thrilled that no children were apparently shot.
Fri Apr 5, 2013, 03:29 PM
Apr 2013

And I don't have any idea what kind of weapon was used. You seem to want to make a big deal out of that, not sure why.

For all we know, he had one. (Or one of the shooters, now sounds like two)

Not really sure what you are playing at here.

Edit: I see it is reported as a shotgun now. Doesn't really explain why no one else was hurt, unless you assume that his intention was to attack a specific person, and not to attack the children. Which gets back to my point earlier about intent. If he had wanted to, an individual with a shotgun can do tremendous damage in that environment, if they wanted to. So maybe dial the snark back a notch, eh?

Response to AtheistCrusader (Reply #18)

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
29. Depends on what dimension of power you are looking at.
Fri Apr 5, 2013, 04:38 PM
Apr 2013

Loaded with 00Buck, a shotgun is putting out the equivalent of 9 rounds of 9mm, like what Loughner used on Gabby Giffords, per shot.

So hopefully you realize the potential for mass mayhem is still there. It is clear from the results that this shooter's intent was quite different than say, Lanza. To the potential victim's benefit, thankfully.

I'm very happy for Canada, and I am perfectly fine with implementing some of their control mechanisms here, including registration.

drm604

(16,230 posts)
15. Where do you keep hearing that it's a cure-all?
Fri Apr 5, 2013, 03:27 PM
Apr 2013

I haven't noticed anyone saying or implying that. Do you have some examples?

Response to Archae (Reply #6)

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
19. Yawn.
Fri Apr 5, 2013, 03:32 PM
Apr 2013

Neither do Americans.

High cyclic rate weapons that fire fully automatic (No legal ones post-1986 and not legal in all states) can at best fire about 1 round in a tenth of a second.

But hey, don't let hyperbole get away from a good snark eh?

Response to AtheistCrusader (Reply #19)

Response to AtheistCrusader (Reply #30)

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
24. You can of course point us towards a post which specifically implies
Fri Apr 5, 2013, 03:49 PM
Apr 2013

You can of course point us towards a post which specifically implies stricter gun control will result in absolutely no deaths, yes?

Martin Eden

(12,863 posts)
37. Who is saying gun control is a "cure-all"???
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 09:56 AM
Apr 2013

I know many people who believe a comprehensive system of background checks and other measures being considered will, in the long run, reduce the number of senseless deaths from gun violence. But as far as I know, nobody thinks any such legislation would be a "cure-all" that immediately ends gun violence or completely addresses the societal ills that are also a factor.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
47. Who specifically told you gun control would prevent any and all gun-related deaths?
Wed Apr 10, 2013, 11:02 AM
Apr 2013

Who specifically told you gun control would prevent any and all gun-related deaths?

Or (much more likely) simply reductio ad absurdum in place of an actual premise?

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
8. Sure, and that is true.
Fri Apr 5, 2013, 02:40 PM
Apr 2013

But I have heard that sort of sentiment honestly used by certain parties, and it doesn't help if we don't set expectations properly.

This is just part of it. We have a violence problem in the US compared to our G20 peers even if you completely deduct the gun related murders, and go with everything else.

So we have a lot to fix, and nothing is a panacea by itself.

Mnemosyne

(21,363 posts)
12. "It's not like we are in the U.S. here, but we are told that everything is under control." Our
Fri Apr 5, 2013, 03:00 PM
Apr 2013

reputation precedes us.

How horrifying, the incident and the comment.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
28. Arm the toddlers. Harden the nurseries. More and bigger guns are always the answer.
Fri Apr 5, 2013, 04:37 PM
Apr 2013
RESPONSE TO LATEST BREAKING NEWS: "Man opens fire in two daycares; kills self"

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
40. Exception that proves the rule - 2/3 of homicides in American are gun murders
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 11:32 AM
Apr 2013
In 2009, according to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, 66.9% of all homicides in the United States were perpetrated using a firearm.[5] There were 52,447 deliberate and 23,237 accidental non-fatal gunshot injuries in the United States during 2000.[6] Two-thirds of all gun-related deaths in the United States are suicides. In 2010, there were 19,392 firearm-related suicide deaths, and 11,078 firearm-related homicide deaths in the United States.[7]


Really.
 

CobblePuller

(38 posts)
41. "exception that proves the rule" is an oxymoron.
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 01:27 PM
Apr 2013

And if you think a simple substitution effect won't take place, I believe you are not think it through.

raccoon

(31,110 posts)
42. "The exception [that] proves the rule" is a frequently misused English phrase.
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 01:48 PM
Apr 2013

Exception that proves the rule
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


"The exception [that] proves the rule" is a frequently misused English phrase. The original meaning of this phrase is that the presence of an exception applying to a specific case establishes ("proves&quot that a general rule exists. For example, a sign that says "parking prohibited on Sundays" (the exception) "proves" that parking is allowed on the other six days of the week (the rule).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exception_that_proves_the_rule

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
44. The more frequent contemporary usage is acceptable - an exception doesn't disprove the norm.
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 02:05 PM
Apr 2013

Have guns become the futile last resort to police error in rhetoric and semantics on DU?

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
39. sounds like murder, suicide? over personal problems.
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 10:45 AM
Apr 2013

Those 2 houses were full of tots, lucky no kids were killed. That trauma will be something the kids will never forget.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Man opens fire in two day...