Man opens fire in two daycares; kills self, children safe
Last edited Fri Apr 5, 2013, 03:28 PM - Edit history (2)
Source: QMI
GATINEAU, Que. A man is reported dead and a woman believed shot after a gunman fired inside two home daycares Friday morning in Gatineau, Que., on the other side of the river from Ottawa.
Police escorted frightened children from both daycares at 225 and 229 Gamelin St., near the Hull hospital.
No children or staff at the Racines de vie Montessori school were injured, say police.
Police say there were 53 children, all under the age of 5, at the daycares at the time.
Read more: http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Crime/2013/04/05/20714341.html
On edit: New story in USA Today: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2013/04/05/quebec-day-care-shooting/2057221/
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,173 posts)I think I'd have a heart attack if I knew one of my kid's was there.
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)I remember after Newtown someone saying that in the future that a nursery/daycare probably be the next location we'd hear about,
well there it is.
Sounds like the gunman was probably targeting the woman and not the kids.
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)A horrible prophecy to be fulfilled....
Archae
(46,317 posts)Err...never mind...
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,988 posts)Archae
(46,317 posts)Robb
(39,665 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Not sure how that matters, given the opportunity was there, and it sounds like the shooter just didn't have kids on the menu.
Response to AtheistCrusader (Reply #9)
devilgrrl This message was self-deleted by its author.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)And I don't have any idea what kind of weapon was used. You seem to want to make a big deal out of that, not sure why.
For all we know, he had one. (Or one of the shooters, now sounds like two)
Not really sure what you are playing at here.
Edit: I see it is reported as a shotgun now. Doesn't really explain why no one else was hurt, unless you assume that his intention was to attack a specific person, and not to attack the children. Which gets back to my point earlier about intent. If he had wanted to, an individual with a shotgun can do tremendous damage in that environment, if they wanted to. So maybe dial the snark back a notch, eh?
Response to AtheistCrusader (Reply #18)
devilgrrl This message was self-deleted by its author.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Loaded with 00Buck, a shotgun is putting out the equivalent of 9 rounds of 9mm, like what Loughner used on Gabby Giffords, per shot.
So hopefully you realize the potential for mass mayhem is still there. It is clear from the results that this shooter's intent was quite different than say, Lanza. To the potential victim's benefit, thankfully.
I'm very happy for Canada, and I am perfectly fine with implementing some of their control mechanisms here, including registration.
drm604
(16,230 posts)I haven't noticed anyone saying or implying that. Do you have some examples?
Response to Archae (Reply #6)
devilgrrl This message was self-deleted by its author.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Neither do Americans.
High cyclic rate weapons that fire fully automatic (No legal ones post-1986 and not legal in all states) can at best fire about 1 round in a tenth of a second.
But hey, don't let hyperbole get away from a good snark eh?
Response to AtheistCrusader (Reply #19)
devilgrrl This message was self-deleted by its author.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Response to AtheistCrusader (Reply #30)
devilgrrl This message was self-deleted by its author.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)I pass background checks all the time.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)You can of course point us towards a post which specifically implies stricter gun control will result in absolutely no deaths, yes?
rurallib
(62,406 posts)which is a great start.
Martin Eden
(12,863 posts)I know many people who believe a comprehensive system of background checks and other measures being considered will, in the long run, reduce the number of senseless deaths from gun violence. But as far as I know, nobody thinks any such legislation would be a "cure-all" that immediately ends gun violence or completely addresses the societal ills that are also a factor.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Who specifically told you gun control would prevent any and all gun-related deaths?
Or (much more likely) simply reductio ad absurdum in place of an actual premise?
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)But I have heard that sort of sentiment honestly used by certain parties, and it doesn't help if we don't set expectations properly.
This is just part of it. We have a violence problem in the US compared to our G20 peers even if you completely deduct the gun related murders, and go with everything else.
So we have a lot to fix, and nothing is a panacea by itself.
http://thecentristword.wordpress.com/2013/01/04/the-simple-chart-disproves-the-entire-nra-argument-on-gun-violence/
But, then you knew that. Didn't you?
Pterodactyl
(1,687 posts)DollarBillHines
(1,922 posts)And one of them worked at the school(s).
valerief
(53,235 posts)Gungeoneer -ass logic
Mnemosyne
(21,363 posts)reputation precedes us.
How horrifying, the incident and the comment.
Robb
(39,665 posts)Robb
(39,665 posts)Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)Thank goodness the kids are o.k.!!!!
leveymg
(36,418 posts)formercia
(18,479 posts)The problem is Assh0les.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)leveymg
(36,418 posts)Really.
CobblePuller
(38 posts)And if you think a simple substitution effect won't take place, I believe you are not think it through.
raccoon
(31,110 posts)Exception that proves the rule
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"The exception [that] proves the rule" is a frequently misused English phrase. The original meaning of this phrase is that the presence of an exception applying to a specific case establishes ("proves" that a general rule exists. For example, a sign that says "parking prohibited on Sundays" (the exception) "proves" that parking is allowed on the other six days of the week (the rule).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exception_that_proves_the_rule
leveymg
(36,418 posts)Have guns become the futile last resort to police error in rhetoric and semantics on DU?
raccoon
(31,110 posts)Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Those 2 houses were full of tots, lucky no kids were killed. That trauma will be something the kids will never forget.