U.N. Rights Boss Calls for Closure of Gitmo ("indefinite incarceration 'clear breach of law'")
Source: Reuters
@Reuters: UN Rights Chief Pillay calls for closure of Guantanamo prison saying indefinite incarceration "clear breach of international law" #breaking
U.N. rights boss calls for closure of Guantanamo prison
Fri Apr 5, 2013 10:04am EDT
GENEVA (Reuters) - The United Nations' top human rights official called on U.S. authorities on Friday to close down the Guantanamo prison camp, saying the indefinite imprisonment of many detainees without charge or trial violated international law.
Navi Pillay said the hunger strike being carried out by some inmates at the facility in southeastern Cuba was a "desperate act" but it was "scarcely surprising".
"We must be clear about this: the United States is in clear breach not just of its own commitments but also of international laws and standards that it is obliged to uphold," she said.
Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSBRE9340IU20130405
Solly Mack
(90,761 posts)The US doesn't care about things like breaching its own commitments or international laws.
If it did...well, everyone knows the rest.
pmorlan1
(2,096 posts)I'm sure glad we didn't elect a Republican president.
xiamiam
(4,906 posts)these phony wars and gitmo are the reason for chained cpi...everyone is in a huff about social security..me too, i'm a senior..but its the friggin immoral and illegal war and policies that we allow to be committed in our names that is destroying us..from within
naaman fletcher
(7,362 posts)we know perfectly well why it doesn't have more attention
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)sikofit3
(145 posts)Gitmo has to go, it is inhumane and illegal! Didn't POTUS say that he was going to close this during his first election???
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)No processing of detainees, no closure of Gitmo. Gotta put them SOMEWHERE, right?
sikofit3
(145 posts)Absolutely, however, why do we have to put them somewhere? None of them have had a trial and I am willing to bet most of them are innocent and will be returned back to their countries free, but damaged forever and probably mentally ill from their illegal cruel detention. But yes, you are right but they should all have lawyers and access to speedy trials.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)lovuian
(19,362 posts)Obama's promise seems to be only words
His actions are a violation of human rights law
Gitmo must be closed
struggle4progress
(118,268 posts)To close the facility, you might want to organize some pressure on your Senators or Representative
One_Life_To_Give
(6,036 posts)Those do not require the Transfer of detainees to the US itself which is what has been blocked. Providing a trial is the least we expect anywhere in the world.
struggle4progress
(118,268 posts)careless about who was imprisoned there, as well as how some were treated, the 166 or so detainees remaining in detention there present a spectrum of legal issues
Some seem to be legally in the position of prisoners of war, in part due to a political consensus in the US that the response to the events of 11 September 2001 should be regarded requiring as a military rather than criminal response.
About a third of the detainees, not so regarded, do not face any prosecution whatsoever and could be released if the US could find a country to accept them: this has, however, been a problem in many cases.
Another thirty, who also do not face prosecution, would be returned to Yemen, except for issues regarding Yemen:
The Obama administration said Tuesday that it is suspending the repatriation of detainees held at Guantanamo Bay to Yemen, where a deteriorating security situation driven by a branch of al-Qaeda has stoked fears that detainees could join -- or rejoin -- the terrorist organization if released ...
http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2010-01-05/world/36778253_1_yemeni-detainees-guantanamo-bay-guantanamo-prison
Return of Yemeni detainees at Guantanamo Bay is suspended
By Peter Finn,January 05, 2010
In at least one case, the courts have blocked resettlement in the US:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/jun/10/palau-guantanamo-detainees-housed
Palau to resettle 17 Guantánamo detainees
Pacific island nation will receive development funds and aid worth up to $200m in return, US official says
Jonathan Watts in Beijing and agencies
Wednesday 10 June 2009 04.58 EDT
mpcamb
(2,870 posts)Figure it's intended to further irritate those with anti-U.N. sentiments.
cqo_000
(313 posts)...Ms. Pillay raises concerns about the obstacles the National Defense Authorization Act of 2013 (NDAA) has created for the closure of the prison camp, but there is no doubt that the president does have the power to transfer men out of Guantanamo under the NDAAs national security waiver, he just refuses to do so. President Obama must stop blaming Congress and trying to have it both ways by claiming he wants to close Guantanamo but his hands are tied because it is simply not true.
http://ccrjustice.org/newsroom/press-releases/light-of-hunger-strike-un-condemns-guantánamo-breach-of-international-law,-urges-closure
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/270239-senate-votes-to-prohibit-gitmo-detainee-transfers-to-us
and with what funds?
Senate Votes To Block Funds For Guantanamo Closure
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/20/senate-votes-to-block-fun_n_205797.html