Aetna Seeks To Avoid Obamacare Rules Next Year
Source: Huffington Post
One of the largest health insurance companies in the United States is advising insurance brokers on how to evade new mandates and benefits set to take effect next year under President Barack Obama's health care reform law.
In an email sent to brokers, the insurance giant Aetna explains how they can renew customers' current health plans before Jan. 1, a strategy the Los Angeles Times reported this week is under consideration at other big health insurance companies.
Obamacare includes a number of new rules for health insurance plans that will become law at the beginning of next year, or whenever existing policies expire. By extending customers' plans before then, health insurance companies and their customers can lock in health plans that don't adhere to those rules for up to one more year.
Among the new rules this approach could skirt are requirements that health insurance cover a minimum set of benefits, prohibitions on turning away people with pre-existing conditions, bans on charging higher rates to sick people or to women, limitations on how much extra older people can be asked to pay, and rules against insurance companies refusing to renew policies.
Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/04/aetna-obamacare_n_3009589.html
onehandle
(51,122 posts)Easy Peasy.
Angleae
(4,479 posts)The 4th amendment prohibits nationalization without due process of law (and compensation thereof).
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Volaris
(10,266 posts)that Corporations maintain the same Constitutional Rights as PERSONS. I say they don't...
Angleae
(4,479 posts)No corporation owns itself. You would have to reimburse all the stockholders, or at least common stockholders.
Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)graham4anything
(11,464 posts)was $3100.00
now its $1500.00
couldn't do this 12 months ago
NO lifetime cap
and they didn't block pre-exisiting conditions.
100% due to President Obama
some work it early
some want to delay it
ta ta aetna. It was a long forced relationship that had on our part a happy breakup.
Thank God for President Obama. As said, I couldn't do this last year and was trapped.
Everyone who benefits so far or when they do, shout it from the roof.
Because people want to sabatoge it and go backward
It's a great move forward. And even more great moves are coming.
The genius of moving slowly forward is the door was opened, and they perservered enabling more tomorrow and more the day after tommorrow and more and more and more and more
til the end goal is reached
Whereas some wanted nothing and the status quo.
President Obama made history happen.
davidwparker
(5,397 posts)antigop
(12,778 posts)Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)My mother has Aetna, so we will be looking soon to change that before they hold us hostage. I hope they go broke.
antigop
(12,778 posts)cbrer
(1,831 posts)Nope. Their bottom line's health.
Lots of money for killing.
Little funds for healing.
Welcome to America!
judesedit
(4,437 posts)AngryOldDem
(14,061 posts)I'm self-insured and I had Aetna as my health policy. I guess they didn't like what my state was doing vis a vis insurance, so they pulled out. I've found a much better, more comprehensive, and cheaper plan (as of right now) that I am very happy with. So far my new plan has covered every claim that's been submitted for me. Can't be happier.
Fuck Aetna.
bigdarryl
(13,190 posts)I don't pay anything but then again they don't cover everything either like Testosterone therapy and plastic surgery
and-justice-for-all
(14,765 posts)and there should be heavy penalties for this shit.
Zoeisright
(8,339 posts)would burn in it. Insurance company execs have to be the scum of the earth. They literally kill people and make themselves millions doing it. FOAD, Aetna.
Occulus
(20,599 posts)And when HIPPA (aka the ACA) was passed, didn't we get shouted down by the cheerleaders who said this just simply couldn't possibly ever happen?
Sometimes I hate being right.....
Somehow this mass delusion - that all of a sudden insurers would stop acting like insurers - has been very persistent.
But now that the thing is really going into effect, we're all going to discover that if you shift more control to the worst-functioning part of a system, the system will begin to function even worse.
Who could have dreamed???
tabasco
(22,974 posts)Sorry fuckers.
Yo_Mama
(8,303 posts)If you make the rules that way, one shouldn't be surprised if everyone does this.
Perhaps this rule should not have been issued!!!!