Roger Ebert dies at 70 after battle with cancer
Source: Chicago Sun-Times
For a film with a daring director, a talented cast, a captivating plot or, ideally, all three, there could be no better advocate than Roger Ebert, who passionately celebrated and promoted excellence in film while deflating the awful, the derivative, or the merely mediocre with an observant eye, a sharp wit and a depth of knowledge that delighted his millions of readers and viewers.
No good film is too long, he once wrote, a sentiment he felt strongly enough about to have engraved on pens. No bad movie is short enough.
Ebert, 70, who reviewed movies for the Chicago Sun-Times for 46 years and on TV for 31 years, and who was without question the nations most prominent and influential film critic, died Thursday in Chicago. He had been in poor health over the past decade, battling cancers of the thyroid and salivary gland.
He lost part of his lower jaw in 2006, and with it the ability to speak or eat, a calamity that would have driven other men from the public eye. But Ebert refused to hide, instead forging what became a new chapter in his career, an extraordinary chronicle of his devastating illness that won him a new generation of admirers. No point in denying it, he wrote, analyzing his medical struggles with characteristic courage, candor and wit, a view that was never tinged with bitterness or self-pity.
Read more: http://www.suntimes.com/17320958-761/roger-ebert-dies-at-70-after-battle-with-cancer.html
warrior1
(12,325 posts)sharp_stick
(14,400 posts)I was really hoping that he could beat it. I know the odds were long but I was cheering for him.
trailmonkee
(2,681 posts)Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)Jennicut
(25,415 posts)RIP Roger.
LadyHawkAZ
(6,199 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)Manifestor_of_Light
(21,046 posts)I'm not a particular movie nut but I always liked to watch them review movies to see if there was something I really needed to see because it was outstanding.
FourScore
(9,704 posts)This is very sad.
gademocrat7
(10,654 posts)elleng
(130,864 posts)but, for a smile,
'Though of course Ebert was not infallible -- while giving Mike Nichols The Graduate four stars in the same year, he added that the movies only flaw, I believe, is the introduction of limp, wordy Simon and Garfunkel songs.'
and:
'All that need be mentioned of Eberts social life was that in the early 1980s he briefly went out with the hostess of a modest local TV show called AM Chicago. Taking her to the Hamburger Hamlet for dinner, Ebert suggested that she syndicate her show, using his success with Siskel as an example of the kind of riches that awaited. While she didnt return his romantic interest, Oprah Winfrey did follow his business advice.'
xxqqqzme
(14,887 posts)tidbits.
We knew this was coming but that is little comfort when the news does arrive.
MoonchildCA
(1,301 posts)What a loss!
TacoD
(581 posts)asjr
(10,479 posts)He was absolutely delightful and had the strength of a lion.
Beowulf
(761 posts)Not merely a movie critic, but a social critic as well.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)his movie reviews were always sprinkled with his observations and insights about how the film fit into our larger culture/values, etc.
and his recent blogging has been a delight.
i really, really will miss him.
absolutely my favorite critic, of movies and otherwise.
Wait Wut
(8,492 posts)I grew up watching Siskel & Ebert. My dad often siding with Siskel, me with Ebert. My father was lucky enough to have met them both. It annoyed him because he said Roger was much friendlier and easier to talk to.
Not unexpected, but still heartbreaking.
LeftofObama
(4,243 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)The way he was towards the end...
The man kept his sense of humor.
Tender to the Bone
(93 posts)I have never seen Roger post-cancer until today and I'm surprised as hell.
It's good to hear that he had his sense of humor towards the end.
The Wizard
(12,541 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)d_b
(7,463 posts)damn cancer took my mom last year at 70. sick of cancer.
RIP
UpInArms
(51,280 posts)you will be missed.
Aristus
(66,316 posts)Thank you for the years and years of excellent film review. You changed the art of film criticism much for the better.
Hook up with Mr. Siskel and watch some good movies, sir.
Farewell...
I'm going to miss his reviews so much...
a kennedy
(29,644 posts)RIP
dhill926
(16,336 posts)a wise and very courageous man.
hibbing
(10,096 posts)Hi,
I always liked him and his reviews. He will be missed.
Peace
pinto
(106,886 posts)RIP, Mr. Ebert
tones fucyes
(48 posts)He will be missed. RIP, Roger.
Unknown Beatle
(2,672 posts)I often followed your advice on which movies to watch and which movies to avoid, and 99.9% of the time, you were spot on.
Thank you for your intellectual honesty about movies and politics.
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)RIP Roger. RIP
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,669 posts)he was a fine writer and a really decent human being. I'll miss reading his reviews and other writings.
ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)he opened my eyes to movies I'd never had considered, and pointed out why several sucked so badly. but he was always generous, polite, and informed.
I still remember when he started off on PBS in chicago. My first thought was, "A show about shows? That won't last." By the fourth show, I was a committed fan.
interestingly, he never pushed crap, and he was polite with his critiques, trying not to damn something that some fans might enjoy. Yet, he still managed to give enough info to give you an more informed decision. Never was he on the take, and never did he destroy a film out of spite. Given the nature of Hollywood, that is saying a hell of a lot.
wysi
(1,512 posts)Goodbye and thank you for sharing your thoughts with us, Mr. Ebert, you will be greatly missed.
Botany
(70,489 posts)a great writer, a fine critic, and a wonderful perspective on things.
He was working on the craft he loved up almost to the very end.
He and Gene were must see T.V..
Chicago Tribune Gene Siskel on "Dances with Wolves"
A three-hour delight... The movie generates much of its power by being so life-affirming at a time when people feel nervous about the future. [9 Nov 1990, Friday, p.C]
Kadie
(15,369 posts)Berlin Expat
(950 posts)What a shame. I enjoyed reading his film reviews, his opinions and his musings.
The world of journalism lost a star. Sympathies to his family.
MotherPetrie
(3,145 posts)Paul E Ester
(952 posts)life long demo
(1,113 posts)nolabear
(41,959 posts)Gosh. I'm genuinely sad. What a courageous man.
Cha
(297,136 posts)Missed!
Boomerproud
(7,951 posts)He fought like a lion.
Still Blue in PDX
(1,999 posts).... In his final blog entry penned earlier this week, Ebert addressed his illness and essentially said goodbye ... writing:
"It really stinks that the cancer has returned and that I have spent too many days in the hospital. So on bad days I may write about the vulnerability that accompanies illness. On good days, I may wax ecstatic about a movie so good it transports me beyond illness."
"So on this day of reflection I say again, thank you for going on this journey with me. I'll see you at the movies."
http://www.tmz.com/2013/04/04/roger-ebert-dead-legendary-movie-critic-dies-at-70/
TeamPooka
(24,221 posts)I think his greatest accomplishment, along with Gene Siskel, was bringing intelligent analysis of feature films to the masses, giving the people the tools and vocabulary only elite reviewers in their ivory towers used at the time. The duo discussed movies in a way that taught everyone in the country how to look at every film with a critical eye. Their show was a mini-film school in syndication.
That's a legacy that I'll give two "thumbs up".
alp227
(32,015 posts)"At the Movies" continued to be a good show even with the new hosts post-Ebert, whenever I caught it on my local ABC station on Sunday afternoon.
TeamPooka
(24,221 posts)Frank Cannon
(7,570 posts)I NEVER missed his shows, from the time I first discovered "Sneak Previews" on PBS way back in 1978.
I was sad when Gene Siskel passed, and now I'm even more sad. Both those guys fed and nurtured my lifelong love of movies.
Thanks for all your great writing, Roger. We'll miss you.
TeamPooka
(24,221 posts)and the next with Roger as they covered so many different cinematic issues and topics.
I often felt like a tennis ball batted between them but those were incredible and illuminating verbal volleys.
sendero
(28,552 posts)... sir!
IcyPeas
(21,857 posts)Tom_Foolery
(4,691 posts)RIP, Mr. Ebert.
me b zola
(19,053 posts)Best wishes to his family and friends.
Blasphemer
(3,261 posts)GoneOffShore
(17,339 posts)Beartracks
(12,809 posts)The world seems a bit dimmer knowing he's no longer in it.
Rest in peace, Mr. Ebert.
=======================
Renew Deal
(81,855 posts)He will be missed.
Tempest
(14,591 posts)The only reviewer I read or listened to.
RIP
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)Especially seeing as how cancer is killing a whole lot more Americans, young and old, than any terrorist ever did. Hell, more than any country ever did. I am so fucking sick of cancer. Fuck, fuck, FUCK.
Brainstormy
(2,380 posts)maybe when we restore scientific integrity to the process that brings us food, medicine, and all the other "better living through chemistry" crap that's killing us for profit. And yes, that promotes death over life. I agree. fuck, fuck, FUCK.
emmadoggy
(2,142 posts)He went through so much these last years.
Rest in peace, Roger Ebert.
Yavin4
(35,433 posts)RIP Mr. Ebert.
undeterred
(34,658 posts)A very good man, RIP.
DinahMoeHum
(21,783 posts)Rest In Peace, Roger Ebert
efhmc
(14,725 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)A man of intelligence, wit and considerable personal courage. Also, a truly marvelous writer. He will be sorely missed.
efhmc
(14,725 posts)RIP
Skittles
(153,147 posts)LoisB
(7,200 posts)Javaman
(62,517 posts)I met him years ago at the Sundance Film Festival.
All I have to say about him is: what a really nice guy.
Rest in peace my fellow film geek.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)Rest in peace, Roger.
BumRushDaShow
(128,831 posts)So sad to see this because he was just in the news talking about slowing down.
R.I.P. to someone who truly showed how the pen could be mightier than the sword.
BeyondGeography
(39,369 posts)GentryDixon
(2,949 posts)Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)I'm not sure we'll ever see anyone else on television talk seriously about movies now.
Zoeisright
(8,339 posts)RIP
sarge43
(28,941 posts)elleng
(130,864 posts) was once asked what movie he thought was shown over and over again in heaven, and what snack would be free of charge and calories there.
Citizen Kane and vanilla Haagen-Dazs ice cream, he answered.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/05/movies/roger-ebert-film-critic-dies.html?pagewanted=2&hp
alphafemale
(18,497 posts)And the looks Roger would cut at him.
Safe passage, Mr Ebert.
A Good man cannot live too long.
LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)colorado_ufo
(5,733 posts)Hekate
(90,642 posts)You will be so missed, but at last you are healed and whole and pain-free.
Poll_Blind
(23,864 posts)...remember disagreeing with him about was Blue Velvet. Even in that case, I suspect it was because he had a crush on Isabella Rossellini. Who doesn't?
PB
sonias
(18,063 posts)Condolences to his family.
all american girl
(1,788 posts)pacalo
(24,721 posts)I just read about his "leave of presence" yesterday & was hoping he'd rebound again.
I appreciated him so much.
So, so sad.
Glimmer of Hope
(5,823 posts)nadine_mn
(3,702 posts)He just updated his blog that his cancer had returned and was undergoing radiation therapy - how did he die so soon after. Bastard cancer. He will be missed by so many including me.
Botany
(70,489 posts)... just recently his cancer had grown so big that it broke his hip and then he blogged he
was stepping down for a "little bit" but if you read between the lines he was saying
good-bye in his last post.
"So on this day of reflection I say again, thank you for going on this journey with me. I'll see you at the movies."
thanx for DUer Still Blue in PDX for posting this.
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)yurbud
(39,405 posts)the first time I watched Siskel & Ebert, the gave two thumbs up to MY DINNER WITH ANDRE, a movie about two old friends who get together and talk about life over dinner for a whole movie.
I couldn't believe it could be good, so I had to go see it, and it was great.
From then on, I was hooked, and I hardly ever disliked a movie he and Gene agreed on.
The Second Stone
(2,900 posts)I'll save an aisle seat for you.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)KatyaR
(3,445 posts)He was an amazing man. To not have gone into hiding when his illness took such a toll, but stepping up and sharing it with the world was such a brave, brave thing. And there will never, ever be another film critic like him. He loved movies so much, he never wanted a movie to fail, even if it was doomed from the start. He was my go-to guy for the movies, and he will be greatly missed.
And sending love and vibes to Chaz, I know she will miss him. They seemed to truly be soulmates.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)(i never read them before)
it was almost a ritual to see a movie then look for his review to see what he thought of it.
and sometimes, you'd come across a review of say "Life of Pi" or "Tree of Life" and his writing was so observant and you could grasp how he was thinking in ethereal ways about the meaning of life, and how a movie had moved him to a state of "wonder" and in that you could observe where he found so much joy and inspiration.
and share in that as well.
i will really, really miss him.
Historic NY
(37,449 posts)You were never silenced, in death we will remember!!
Go well with fair winds.......
johnfunk
(6,113 posts)Hat tip: Think Progress
DirkGently
(12,151 posts)He was great for a long, long time, and nothing stopped him but death itself, and that stops everyone, eventually. Cancer / no cancer. Jawbone / no jawbone. Voice / no voice. He kept writing and thinking and contributing, full-speed, better and for longer than many of us ever have or will, and he left his unique mark.
No one wins victory over death. But he sure as hell won victories over a lot of other things. Disease, fear, disability. And, to all of our benefit, over bad movies and bad writing about movies.
He did it. He won this one. Roger Ebert won at humanity, at art, at life.
I will not say "two thumbs up." But ... you know.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)such a great, honest and insightful tribute for an amazing individual.
when we do good work, when we overcome things, we make each other better.
and our world as well.
RIP.
glad I can share my grief with people like you that feel the loss.
DirkGently
(12,151 posts)BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)But, "No good film is too long."
*sniff* .....
Gonna miss him....