Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,073 posts)
Thu Apr 4, 2013, 12:56 AM Apr 2013

Obama fundraises, catches Keystone heat in Calif.

Source: AP-Excite

By JIM KUHNHENN

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) - President Barack Obama is raising money for the Democratic Party in California, eager to weaken his Republican opposition in Congress even as he confronts protests from his liberal flank over a contested oil pipeline project that is awaiting approval from his administration.

Obama was attending four fundraisers for Democrats in the San Francisco area Wednesday and Thursday, urging donors to help wrest the House away from Republicans and to reinstate House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi as House speaker.

Environmental activists protested the pipeline, knows as the Keystone XL project, outside one of the events, and his host at another one is a vocal opponent of the project. The pipeline would transport oil from Canada's tar sands to Texas Gulf Coast refineries.

"No pipeline for the 1 percent," demonstrators chanted about a block and a half from the Pacific Heights home of composer and philanthropist Gordon Getty, who was hosting a dinner fundraising event.

FULL story at link.


Read more: http://apnews.excite.com/article/20130404/DA5EG5483.html





President Barack Obama salutes as he arrives at San Francisco International Airport in San Francisco, Wednesday, April 3, 2013. (AP Photo/Tony Avelar)

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama fundraises, catches Keystone heat in Calif. (Original Post) Omaha Steve Apr 2013 OP
I hope he's listening. CaliforniaPeggy Apr 2013 #1
Ditto. tblue Apr 2013 #2
NO bets on this one, TYVM! CaliforniaPeggy Apr 2013 #3
Perhaps ARK will change his mind Omaha Steve Apr 2013 #4
It should at least give him pause... CaliforniaPeggy Apr 2013 #5
NAFTA rules force Canada and Mexico to sell petroleum products to the USA, IIRC Kolesar Apr 2013 #7
This is 10's of billions of $$$. or 100's of billions. delrem Apr 2013 #6
+1 KoKo Apr 2013 #8
Well said. You should post this as a separate OP, so it will be read by more people. CaliforniaPeggy Apr 2013 #9
I agree - the project can NOT be stopped. Too many international deals peripheral blm Apr 2013 #10

CaliforniaPeggy

(149,308 posts)
1. I hope he's listening.
Thu Apr 4, 2013, 01:02 AM
Apr 2013

If he approves of the pipeline, as seems likely, the jobs will come from the inevitable pipeline ruptures, and the futile clean-up.

Disgusting, all of it.

Kolesar

(31,182 posts)
7. NAFTA rules force Canada and Mexico to sell petroleum products to the USA, IIRC
Thu Apr 4, 2013, 07:25 AM
Apr 2013

I wonder if there is some obscure codicil that can be leveraged to control the distribution of their "bitumen".

delrem

(9,688 posts)
6. This is 10's of billions of $$$. or 100's of billions.
Thu Apr 4, 2013, 02:49 AM
Apr 2013

The tarsands has enormous momentum built up over years.

IMO the project can't be stopped, it can only be controlled - the development of it must be taken out of the hands of the corporations owning it, directly profiting from it, because the decisions of those companies has nothing to do with what is of most benefit to the people of NA.

For example, why the *&%# is anyone even thinking about sending raw bitumen sludge all the way from northern Alberta to the Gulf of Mexico to be processed. What kind of crap has to be melded into that sludge to allow it to flow that distance? What happens to that crap, and the rest of the waste, once it arrives at the Gulf of Mexico? What happens to the desertified land of northern Alberta once the resource is depleted, what happens to the utterly destroyed ecosystem (the rivers, lakes, are already cancerous)? The companies that profit from this development DO NOT WANT THESE TOPICS ADDRESSED, because dealing with these issues requires moneys taken from investors pockets.

IMO what's required is a paradigm shift in North American governance. It is required FAST.
In this regard, I think more credence ought to be given to the South America example, e.g. to the Bolivarian revolution, to that kind of grass roots, people first, thinking where it is understood as patently obvious that *the natural resources of a country belong to the people*.



blm

(112,920 posts)
10. I agree - the project can NOT be stopped. Too many international deals peripheral
Thu Apr 4, 2013, 11:44 AM
Apr 2013

to Keystone have no doubt been made over the years, because Hillary and her team were always 100% behind Keystone. Every pause has been purely for political theater and to give Clinton the distance from the signing that she will need to have a smooth primary. I have no doubt Kerry (who was always against the deal) was required to accept the deal as done and take the hits for the signing, as well, in order to become Sec of State. I hope he does manage to influence it in part, at least to curb the most onerous aspects of it.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Obama fundraises, catches...