Obama picks Goldman Sachs exec for ambassador to Canada
Source: CBC
U.S. President Barack Obama has selected a partner at the investment firm of Goldman Sachs in Chicago to be the new U.S. ambassador to Canada, CBC News has learned.
..... If he is approved, Heyman would replace David Jacobson, who has held the position since 2009. Jacobson is also from Chicago.
Well known as a high-level fundraiser to Barack Obama, Heyman and his wife Vicki, also a fundraiser, raised more than $1 million for Obama and were on his national finance committee.
Heyman runs the private wealth fund at Goldman Sachs and his areas of responsibility include parts of Canada.
Read more: http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2013/04/03/pol-us-ambassador-to-canada-obama.html
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)On the other hand ...hey Canada ...here ...have a little of what we are dealing with. O well ...I guess he could have selected someone from United Healthcare.
forestpath
(3,102 posts)City Lights
(25,171 posts)Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)ambassador positions, particularly to countries where we don't have stranied relations.
bloomington-lib
(946 posts)Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Oh wait ...hrmm ...what was it Obama was saying about lobbyists in DC ...before he was elected. O yea of course it's not the same thing ...is it.
Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)bvar22
(39,909 posts)That is one reason why I voted for the guy promising "change".
Jokes on me , Hunh?
Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)Or are you just projecting your wishes?
progressoid
(49,978 posts)And apparently common practice = change.
Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)progressoid
(49,978 posts)"Make no mistake: We need to end an era in Washington where accountability has been absent, oversight has been overlooked, your tax dollars have been turned over to wealthy CEOs and the well-connected corporations,"
Obama said at an Oct. 1 campaign stop in Wisconsin. "You need leadership you can trust to work for you, not for the special interests who have had their thumb on the scale. And together, we will tell Washington, and their lobbyists, that their days of setting the agenda are over. They have not funded my campaign. You have. They will not run my White House. You'll help me run my White House."
Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)progressoid
(49,978 posts)No, he's not a lobbyist. But that's not the point and you know it. I was going to highlight the pertinent parts of the quotes that you conveniently ignored, or perhaps I could find another appropriate quote, but I doubt it would make any difference.
Actually, this appointment is pretty minor in comparison to the many Wall Street and corporate insiders that now have jobs in the administration. It's just damned disheartening and frustrating to see it happen again and again. Especially by our side.
While most of us work day to day to barely make ends meet, it business as usual in the Corporate States of America. The rich get richer and we're supposed to gleefully support it.
And now, I have to get back to work to try to make ends meet.
OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)tblue
(16,350 posts)But these appointments make me crazy.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)longship
(40,416 posts)I thought we were rid of that when Hank Paulson left Treasury.
Apparently not.
ForgoTheConsequence
(4,868 posts)I don't even know what to say anymore.
"It's a big club, and you ain't in it"
bluedigger
(17,086 posts)forestpath
(3,102 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)OmahaBlueDog
(10,000 posts)Canada looks to be an outstanding takeover opportunity for the US. Hopefully Goldman will loan us the capital at attractive rates.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)wouldn't or shouldn't that be a conflict of interest or does the fact that he will have to resign that position exonerate him?
DFW
(54,349 posts)And his familiarity with the country will be put forth as justification for offering him the post.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)still though in a way it reminds me of Cheney and Halliburton, just not bad or extreme
DFW
(54,349 posts)Canada is a huge trading partner, granted, but our ties with them involve huge environmental issues, immigration questions, border policies, NATO stuff, a huge range of things not directly concerned with investment banking. We need more than just a money guy for Canada, even one who is on our side.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)DFW
(54,349 posts)I was with Raymond at the Canadian Embassy residence in Paris when he told me about the new Cheneybush appointee as American Ambassador to France. He was some Texas hack who gave Cheneybush a ton of money. His wife was berating Raymond for not having a photo of himself and Bush on the piano in the reception room. Raymond patiently explained that he only had photos of himself and the heads of state who were in office when he was Canada's ambassador to their respective countries. The Bush ambassador's wife couldn't stand it that the only American president whose photo was on that piano was Bill Clinton, and was very vocal about it. And this is the kind of person the Republicans were having represent our country in France.
Cheneybush picked another contributor to be ambassador to the UK because the guy had horses and Bush heard that the Queen liked horses. NATO? The EU? Relations with and conduits to Muslim countries? Who cares about THAT stuff? This guy liked horses, whoopee! Ugh!!
DFW
(54,349 posts)I still wish we would stop the practice, and ESPECIALLY stop the practice of rewarding contributors with postings to major countries with whom we have huge important economic, military and political ties.
I think of the Canadian ambassador to the United States during Clinton's last term. His name is Raymond Chrétien, and he was the finest foreign service officer of ANY country I have ever met. I would have recruited him for us if I could have. Bright, well-versed in his craft, dedicated and not afraid to get his hands dirty. Raymond is retired now, but while he was ambassador to France, there was some epidemic outbreak in the former Zaire in Africa, where he had been ambassador years before. No matter. He left his cushy residence on the Faubourg St. Honoré (were THOSE some digs!!) and went back down to Africa to help with the stricken victims. Somehow, I don't see a Goldman Sachs guy doing that. Send him to be ambassador to Monaco or Liechtenstein or some such place, but not Canada, for Pete's sake. That's what we have a State Department for.
Did not know about the previous ambassador. My gosh, how far we have fallen.
DFW
(54,349 posts)Because the small town newspaper my dad worked for is on the Canadian border, and my dad was their Washington correspondent, he had to meet with the Canadian ambassador at least once a week, and since he was closer to my age, we got to be friends. Raymond and his wife are both from Québec, although his wife is an Anglo. After thirty years in the Canadian Foreign Service, Raymond retired when his uncle retired as PM--a well-deserved rest. After his time in Washington was up, Raymond served one last post--as Canada's ambassador to France. Since that is just down the road from me, I used to see him in Paris on occasion, and was the only Anglo at his farewell party for Francophones--quite an honor, but boring as I didn't know anybody else there!
Maybe we do have people of his caliber in our foreign service, but if we do, we need them in posts like Ambassador to Canada, and all other major countries. When we sent people like Mike Mansfield (who was very knowledgeable about Japan already) and Walter Mondale as ambassador to Japan, the Japanese loved the gesture that we took them seriously. When Cheneybush sent his horse crony to the Court of St. James and that other clown to Paris, how do you think that went down in the respective countries? Shit like that matters a LOT when we start looking for allies in our foreign policy.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)Very well said!!!
msongs
(67,395 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)Demo_Chris
(6,234 posts)Newest Reality
(12,712 posts)and genuflect in all due humility to the GREAT BULGY WOBBLING GOLDMAN SACKS!
Praise this great head of the Nation!
And I promise to still pretend that the facade about all that "We the People" stuff is real and effective. Shhh! Best not talk too much about that lest the Fusion Center intercept me as a pre-crime thought criminal.
Demo_Chris
(6,234 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)limpyhobbler
(8,244 posts)polly7
(20,582 posts)[IMG][/IMG]
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Now Jamie... no, don't... those cufflinks are very nice, the secret service won't let that happen, and I don't even think they'd fit there. This isn't what you're thinking... it's just that Canada's pretty cold, I thought that your guys would want the next warm one. Just... just... please don't use those words, Sasha and Malia might hear them through the phone when you're shouting so loud. Yes, I am certainly keeping on top of the Elizabeth Warren thing..."
just1voice
(1,362 posts)---The Biggest Housing Bubble in the World Is in ... Canada?---
Canuckistanian
(42,290 posts)In fact, Harper will probably kneel and kiss his ring at the credential ceremony.
demwing
(16,916 posts)that's full of rofl
Carolina
(6,960 posts)Obama continues to show his true colors (no pun intended)
He campaigns one way but surrounds himself with advisors, ambassadors, cabinet officers who are the antithesis of his campaign rhetoric.
He continues to disappoint and continues to prove who owns him.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)"Behind-the-scenes disputes over huge sums are common in banking, but the standoff between A.I.G. and Goldman would become one of the most momentous in Wall Street history. Well before the federal government bailed out A.I.G. in September 2008, Goldmans demands for billions of dollars from the insurer helped put it in a precarious financial position by bleeding much-needed cash. That ultimately provoked the government to step in.
With taxpayer assistance to A.I.G. currently totaling $180 billion, regulatory and Congressional scrutiny of Goldmans role in the insurers downfall is increasing. The Securities and Exchange Commission is examining the payment demands that a number of firms most prominently Goldman made during 2007 and 2008 as the mortgage market imploded.
The S.E.C. wants to know whether any of the demands improperly distressed the mortgage market, according to people briefed on the matter who requested anonymity because the inquiry was intended to be confidential.
In just the year before the A.I.G. bailout, Goldman collected more than $7 billion from A.I.G. And Goldman received billions more after the rescue. Though other banks also benefited, Goldman received more taxpayer money, $12.9 billion, than any other firm.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/07/business/07goldman.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
Screw Goldman Sachs!!!!
Comrade_McKenzie
(2,526 posts)You Obama-hating goons crack me up.
And he's the President again, so that 1 million was well spent. Glad my President knows how to play the game.
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)Celefin
(532 posts)He's the President again, not 'your' President. You can't afford shares in Obama, others can.
The President promised to work towards changing this game - not to be a slick player.
I don't get how these viewpoints qualify as Obama hating.
It's system hating, if anything. Very few would complain if he hadn't campaigned on changing this system.
But then he might not have become the President in the first place... kind of a hen and egg problem.
Anyway, awarding ambassador or similar posts for favors dates back to Roman times.
And there are a lot of ancient Latin documents describing how this tradition is a very bad idea.
Might be an idea to change it after 2000 years?
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)Hi! I'm from Goldman, Sachs and I'm here to help!
- Sorry Canada.....
[font size=4]d[/font]
K&R
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)(cuz you ain't gettin' any)
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)to do the bidding of the 1% in order to keep himself in office.
Instead, now he can really start kicking some 1% butt.
Sorry, Canada. It was nice being friends with you.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Do we see that this is not a Red versus Blue problem anymore?
Ready to become the 99 percent yet?