Red Scare #9
“Why don’t we do it in the road?
Why don’t we do it in the road?
Why don’t we do it in the road?
No one will be watching us
Why don’t we do it in the road?”
-- Paul McCartney
Most historians would not even mention Paul McCartney in a discussion of “McCarthyism,” for obvious reasons. Fewer still would begin such an attempt at conversations about America’s second great Red Scare with a quote from one of Sir Paul’s curious contributions to the double LP titled “The Beatles,” though commonly known as “the White Album.” But there is an actual good reason for my including here, perhaps beyond the simple fact that Side Two of the double LP is spinning on my turn-table as I type this. (We’ll see, won’t we?)
“McCarthyism” in the gutter sense describes the attitude of much of America circa 1950-56. It is known as the second “red scare” in America. There was an attempt -- rather successful, at that -- to scare people into refusing to listen to anyone who dared to ask questions; or to read literature that asked questions; or to be in any way DISLOYAL.
The insane Senator Joseph McCarthey (R-Hell) wanted everyone to take loyalty pledges of allegiance to his flag. Failure to do so resulted in a dynamic that involved excessive allegations of disloyalty; twisting of a person’s sincere dissent into evidence of betrayal; and vicious attacks upon the character of anyone who didn’t subscribe 100% to the party line.
This form of McCarthyism is a malignancy upon a democratic society. Note that I used the word “is” to describe it -- because this disease is never truly cured: it goes into remission, but always is present in the uglier regions of the human minds, seeking opportunity to re-assert itself in the most surprising of places.
The positive form of “McCarthyism” was found in America in 1967-68, when a diverse group of patriotic citizens at the grass roots level questioned the establishment’s definitions of reality. The combined force of this dissent created a synergy that resulted in Senator Eugene McCarthy challenging LBJ. What is funny is that history has revealed that the very same cogs in the Washington, DC machine that accused the people supporting this McCarthyism of being disloyal to the cause, actually were questioning -- but only among themselves -- if LBJ had totally lost his grip on reality, and was stark raving mad? Yet they remained “loyal,” though it is hard to see that as a strength today.
Now, there are many things about LBJ that deserve respect. I’ve heard it said that Martin Luther King, Jr., could not have accomplished all he did, with his protests in the streets, if LBJ hadn’t been in the White House. And that’s true. Yet, King had to challenge LBJ’s stance on Vietnam, to remain true to his principles. But this wasn’t simply a “purity test” for King: for the “war on poverty” and the Great Society were being destroyed by the war in Vietnam.
Fast-forward 48 years, and we see some of those same dynamics at play here on DU:GD. If you don’t vote this way, you ain’t loyal. A red state scare: do you want to be responsible for Ted Cruz in the White House? And on and on and on.
Sides three and four of the White Album are simply outstanding.
= new reply since forum marked as read
Simply outstanding. Not surprising, coming from you. But certainly the stuff of a great OP, in and of itself. Thank you so much!
Your first paragraph reminded me of Martin Luther King's most prophetic speak -- "A Time to Break Silence" (aka "Beyond Vietnam"
from April 4, 1967 -- in which he warned that if our nation did not make serious changes, wars like Vietnam would continue in other places, such as Afghanistan, Iraq, etc.
King was attacked, not only by the hawks of the day, but even more painfuly, by too many of those who were too cowardly to grasp the Truth of his message, much less to act upon it. That included many from the Civil Rights movement, the social liberals who began the neoconservative movement at that exact time, and many, many others.
We are, of course, facing very similar problems today. And being called "disloyal," in an attempt to discredit any meaningful dissent from machine politics.
And a failure to learn anything from past elections. Great post btw! 
They always are easy to spot. Crying about people merely talking about the Third Way etc.. So obvious since nobody said a single one supported neoliberalism. They all came forward and told us themselves by trying to be 'cute' and pretend TW is a fable or harmless.
I am glad they pointed themselves out to this board, they probably didn't mean to. 
...great summary of a history I've only read snippets of - disjointed and skewed snippets judging by your reading. Interesting detail and perspective. Much appreciated.
Thank you Water Man
characters get so caught up in the hysteria that they have to sign a loyalty oath in order to be able to sign the loyalty oath.
