General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsState of the Union
He shall from time to time give to Congress information of the State of the Union and recommend to their Consideration such measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient.
-- U.S. Constitution; Article II, Section 3
Ive been watching State of the Union addresses for as long as I can remember. At their best, they combine form and substance: all three branches of the federal government gathered for a purpose outlined in the Constitution; FDRs Four Freedoms, and LBJs Great Society.
At their worst, they feature the farce of Ronald Reagan, or the deformed lies of George W. Bush. As much as I knew that watching Reagan or Bush would result in frustration, I still watched them. Reagan, I believe, knew that he was an actor delivering lines; Bush believed that he was The Man.
There is, obviously, more than a bit of theater involved in State of the Union addresses. Yet that does not necessarily take away from their importance. In a very real sense, they remind me of the closing arguments delivered by prosecutors and defense attorneys in important trials. The formality of the setting, and the attention being paid to the speech, are part of the reason why.
More, no matter if a person is a judge, a prosecutor, or a defense attorney, they are an officer of the court. They have pledged an allegiance to the court system, that in theory dictates their behaviors within the process of a trial. For most of our nations history, the court system was primarily a white gentlemens debating society. A William Kunstler was rare, indeed.
Likewise, the U.S. Senate was -- with some important exceptions -- also a white gentlemens debating society. Members of this elite society had a allegiance to maintaining it as a noble institution. This has traditionally been less true of the House of Representatives, although it, too, has historically been populated by a very limited selection of the American public. And, of course, the U.S. Supreme Court has a similar history, though it has tended to operate largely as a secret society.
Joseph McCarthy remains the poster child for those who violate the accepted, if unofficial, rules of decorum in such gentlemens societies. His behavior shocked and offended other club members, reaching a point where the Senate finally castrated him. Today, of course, we see Senator Ted Cruz aping the McCarthy persona, but not quite daring to cross the ill-defined line that could end his career.
In a very real sense, I thought that President Obamas address last night ranked among the very best of my life-time. It was solid in form and substance. In fact, it was solid enough that one could ask if, considering what the make-up of the House and Senate will be, it can possibly be translated into anything more than the 2016 democratic candidates platform? For in truth, we have two houses of Congress inhabited by people of low ethical standards, who have pledged their allegiance to corporations and the 1%.
Yet I do not think the current situation is hopeless -- because I know that the grass roots are not helpless. I am convinced that this nation can make progress towards the basic goals that the president identified last night: strengthening and enlarging the middle calls, while empowering the lower economic class. I know that will be difficult, and that Congress will oppose any meaningful efforts at reform. But we can achieve success, not because of the corporate-congress complex, but in spite of it.
Earlier this week, we honored the memory of the late Martin Luther King, Jr. He provided us with the model that we need to be using today: voter registration, public education, and active non-violent civic participation. Its not a mystery. It wont happen by way of wringing our hands, and saying its impossible. Change wont happen by way of identifying this generations Martin, and looking for someone else to do for us what we need to be doing for ourselves. And it surely wont come about because of the patriotism and moral fiber of those in Washington, DC. That aint going to happen.
But it can happen if the good people in America make it happen. Thats the only way.
Peace,
H2O Man
Octafish
(55,745 posts)As the Middle Classes have a smaller slice of it, those who matter in Wall Street on the Potomac pay attention when the phone rings to the quantity of holdings of the caller and not the order in which the call was received.
We can get rhetoric, though. Like speech itself, it's free.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)'money' or 'money is speech' I have been told by some of my right wing 'friends'.
I used to argue against that with them. But it's true. Money BUYS speech. Which means the working class and the poor cannot afford it.
And that is why Citizens United must be overturned. To preserve this democracy, what is left of it, speech needs to be free.
Otherwise I agree with the rest of your comment.
H2O Man
(73,536 posts)It is absolutely true that politics today is bought and paid for. No question whatsoever. So much so, that many of us believe that it is the only language that politicians understand.
But it isn't.
Politicians also understand the langue of votes. It can limit the conversation in the media during a campaign. It can buy votes. And, as we saw in 2000, financial interests can sometimes trump the actual outcome that is the will of the voters.
More, I'm convinced that the higher the level f political office, the less distinct the differences between the two major parties. The vote that empowered Bush & Cheney to invade Iraq is an example. Not to say that there aren't some general differences, or that individuals are very different. But both parties are controlled by big money.
Still, I would say that it is within our power to change the nation. Part of that involves speaking the language that allows us to best communicate with our elected representatives.
panader0
(25,816 posts)having the SOTU address right after Dr. King's birthday. It provides an interesting juxtaposition.
H2O Man
(73,536 posts)must have influenced President Obama's thinking, too. I hope that it influences his behavior in the remainder of his term in office.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)... the TPP but otherwise thought it would be a good platform for Democrats in 2016. I'm afraid I don't share your optimism regarding short-term improvements, but as Dr. King said, the arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends towards justice.
Hope I live long enough to see this turned around, and I sure hope it's soon. The poisoning of our water is proceeding.
H2O Man
(73,536 posts)was a young man -- so we're going way back! -- and was at a small meeting at the Long House. Chief Oren Lyons told us not to expect to see the results of our efforts in our live-time. He said to think of the concept of time in terms of the red wood trees, not in the time of ants. I've never forgotten that.
So the short-term improvements that I know are possible are exclusive to the thinking and behaviors of the inhabitants of the grass roots, rather than the people in DC. If we change, however, they will begin to change, too.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Yes, but first the people had to wake up to what was really going on. As someone who took a while to grasp the extent to which Corporations rule this country's politics, I believe that a great awakening IS happening. Until then, the people, including most of us here, 'went along' and helped this Corporate system to prevail.
I am excited by the signs that this is no longer the case. Liberals need to speak out, to get tough, to refuse to 'compromise' and repeat what has not worked for the people.
And slowly, it is beginning to happen.
As you say, it won't happen by itself, but I feel we are seeing signs that it won't have to.
Good OP as always, H20 Man
I remember in 1964 -- I believe in response to the "I Have a Dream" speech -- Minister Malcolm X said that the best way to make a dream come true is to wake up and get busy. I think that more and more people are recognizing that the direction we are heading in is very wrong. That it goes against what they were taught this country stands for. And that we need to make changes, to improve the lot of the majority of citizens.
We have the power to make those changes.
Hekate
(90,645 posts)lovemydog
(11,833 posts)I agree with you that it's the only way - for the good people in America to make it happen.
It's past time that we raise taxes on the rich. Democrats should stand behind closing loopholes and doubling marginal tax rates on the richest, while lowering them for the majority. We should be talking about the Eisenhower-era when the top rates on the wealthiest were over 80%. We should double the capital gains tax.
We must also focus on rising wages.You can't stimulate an economy when people can't afford to spend much money. Even Henry Ford understood that he had to pay workers enough money so they could buy his cars. Support unions!
We need candidates who will run and win on this. Share the wealth. We need to grow up and stop believing in supply-side economics. We won't improve things via nonsense. Or with defeatism and negativism.
I think historically the most substantive thing the President said is that we have recovered from the crises of 9/11 and the economic disaster. I will always thank President Obama for that. Now we must decide a way forward as a country. One that is inclusive and rewards the hardest-working people and grows the middle class.
My vote goes toward peace and prosperity. For all.
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,588 posts)I admire and respect your calm, lucid prose. You seem to get to the core issues so effortlessly.
I agree with all your points.
K&R
herding cats
(19,564 posts)I always enjoy reading your words. Even on the occasions when I don't agree completely with them, I still enjoy them.
Here's to hopeful tomorrows.