Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Tue Apr 30, 2013, 02:42 PM Apr 2013

So if even a mixed system of well regulated capitalism and socialism sucks, what's the solution?

I keep being told it sucks by fellow duers. What would work better and be more equitable?

And just to be clear, we regulated means strong regulation of wall street and banking, including breaking up the too big to fail banks. It means universal single payer healthcare for all. It means a system of colleges that are no or low cost. In short, regulated capitalism with strong social safety nets.

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So if even a mixed system of well regulated capitalism and socialism sucks, what's the solution? (Original Post) cali Apr 2013 OP
It wouldn't suck anywere nearly as bad as it does if Drale Apr 2013 #1
The 'Economic Bill of Rights' for starters and more creativity in this vein in the future. RadiationTherapy Apr 2013 #2
Wish I could rec this post! JNelson6563 Apr 2013 #11
one possible solution PD Turk Apr 2013 #3
When will we try "In short, regulated capitalism with strong social safety nets." ? Vincardog Apr 2013 #4
Take humans out of the equation and you can cure all of humanity's ills. Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2013 #5
no shit. it's not like human nature magically transforms from one system to another cali Apr 2013 #7
what we suffer from is DeRegulated Capitolism FreakinDJ Apr 2013 #6
/\ /\ THIS /\ /\. Capitalism in this country isn't well-regulated and that's the problem. octoberlib Apr 2013 #15
How about like bringing all of the commanding heights of industry tralala Apr 2013 #8
It needs to be tweeked till it does not suck anymore... damyank913 Apr 2013 #9
It's the best solution to date, I guess krispos42 Apr 2013 #10
that'd be a helluva lot better than what we have now 0rganism Apr 2013 #12
where is this supposed system you speak of? Viking12 Apr 2013 #13
Heh! I just said in another thread that I think a mixture of regulated capitalism & socialism.... Little Star Apr 2013 #14
There's obviously no future under capitalism except for the bourgeois tralala Apr 2013 #16
Obviously the solution is a free and unregulated market system. Rex Apr 2013 #17
I think your second paragraph is right on the money (no pun intended). JaneyVee Apr 2013 #18
i wouldn't even call it redistribution, i'd simply call it "fairness" dionysus Apr 2013 #19

Drale

(7,932 posts)
1. It wouldn't suck anywere nearly as bad as it does if
Tue Apr 30, 2013, 02:44 PM
Apr 2013

we could take the greed out of the situation and regulate profits and compensation.

RadiationTherapy

(5,818 posts)
2. The 'Economic Bill of Rights' for starters and more creativity in this vein in the future.
Tue Apr 30, 2013, 02:46 PM
Apr 2013

“The Economic Bill of Rights”

Excerpt from President Roosevelt's January 11, 1944 message to the Congress of the United States on the State of the Union:[2]
“ It is our duty now to begin to lay the plans and determine the strategy for the winning of a lasting peace and the establishment of an American standard of living higher than ever before known. We cannot be content, no matter how high that general standard of living may be, if some fraction of our people—whether it be one-third or one-fifth or one-tenth—is ill-fed, ill-clothed, ill-housed, and insecure.

This Republic had its beginning, and grew to its present strength, under the protection of certain inalienable political rights—among them the right of free speech, free press, free worship, trial by jury, freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures. They were our rights to life and liberty.

As our nation has grown in size and stature, however—as our industrial economy expanded—these political rights proved inadequate to assure us equality in the pursuit of happiness.

We have come to a clear realization of the fact that true individual freedom cannot exist without economic security and independence. “Necessitous men are not free men.”[3] People who are hungry and out of a job are the stuff of which dictatorships are made.

In our day these economic truths have become accepted as self-evident. We have accepted, so to speak, a second Bill of Rights under which a new basis of security and prosperity can be established for all—regardless of station, race, or creed.

Among these are:

The right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries or shops or farms or mines of the nation;

The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation;

The right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at a return which will give him and his family a decent living;

The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by monopolies at home or abroad;

The right of every family to a decent home;

The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health;

The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident, and unemployment;

The right to a good education.

All of these rights spell security. And after this war is won we must be prepared to move forward, in the implementation of these rights, to new goals of human happiness and well-being.

America's own rightful place in the world depends in large part upon how fully these and similar rights have been carried into practice for all our citizens.

For unless there is security here at home there cannot be lasting peace in the world." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Bill_of_Rights

octoberlib

(14,971 posts)
15. /\ /\ THIS /\ /\. Capitalism in this country isn't well-regulated and that's the problem.
Tue Apr 30, 2013, 03:20 PM
Apr 2013

Also, if we had publicly financed elections politicians wouldn't feel beholden to their corporate donors.

tralala

(239 posts)
8. How about like bringing all of the commanding heights of industry
Tue Apr 30, 2013, 02:54 PM
Apr 2013

under state ownership. Instead of wages people receive stipends. One month vacation every year. Massive subsidization of cultural activities.

krispos42

(49,445 posts)
10. It's the best solution to date, I guess
Tue Apr 30, 2013, 02:58 PM
Apr 2013

If we move to the capitalist side, we start seeing the pillaging of the people, and if we move to the communist side, we also see the pillaging of the people.


If it sucks, but it's the best we're able to achieve, then I guess we stick with it until some bright person thinks of something else.


The mix you describe (Scandinavian model) seems to work well in that it harnesses the greed and desire for profit and power, with the freedom to be innovative through competition and monopoly prevention, and takes enough from the very successful to prevent them from domination the system while supporting the people that made them successful and educating and caring for the next generation.

0rganism

(23,933 posts)
12. that'd be a helluva lot better than what we have now
Tue Apr 30, 2013, 03:04 PM
Apr 2013

who says it sucks? They must live in Awesomeville, Amazingstan if they have a much better system to compare it with.

Viking12

(6,012 posts)
13. where is this supposed system you speak of?
Tue Apr 30, 2013, 03:10 PM
Apr 2013

Certainly not here in the U.S.; "well regulated capitalism" my ass.

Little Star

(17,055 posts)
14. Heh! I just said in another thread that I think a mixture of regulated capitalism & socialism....
Tue Apr 30, 2013, 03:19 PM
Apr 2013

is the best system. There really is no other better solution imo.

tralala

(239 posts)
16. There's obviously no future under capitalism except for the bourgeois
Tue Apr 30, 2013, 03:21 PM
Apr 2013

and the solution to capitalism is not more capitalism, so... I guess it's a matter of looking at the way things are developing, answering difficult questions, putting on a sandwich board that says "Go Away, I'm Insane"...

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
17. Obviously the solution is a free and unregulated market system.
Tue Apr 30, 2013, 03:21 PM
Apr 2013

And if anyone complains...ask them why they hate our freedumbs and wave your flag in their face!

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
18. I think your second paragraph is right on the money (no pun intended).
Tue Apr 30, 2013, 03:27 PM
Apr 2013

Also, much higher taxes on the rich. The rich had an obscene run, time to redistribute the wealth downwards and give wage earners a shot at entrepreneurship.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So if even a mixed system...