Obama and the Myth of Arm-Twisting
http://www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2013/apr/26/obama-and-myth-arm-twisting/
The nonsense about what it takes for a president to win a victory in Congress has reached ridiculous dimensions. The fact that Barack Obama failed to win legislation to place further curbs on the purchase of gunseven after the horror of Newtown, Connecticuthas made people who ought to know better decide that hes not an arm-twister. Ever since Obama took office, others have been certain about how he should handle the job and that he wasnt doing it right.
Yet if the health care law is allowed to work, despite continuing Republican efforts to try to make sure that it doesnt, and if we take into account some other victoriesthe Lilly Ledbetter Act, the stimulus that was as large as the political market would bear, the Dodd-Frank financial regulation bill, the largest since the New Deal if Congress will let it be implementedhis presidency could go down as a time of historic achievement.
Nevertheless, when an insufficient number of senators was available to kill a hypothetical filibuster of the gun billa watered-down measure to expand background checks for gun sales (while opening gaping loopholes)suddenly the word went out that the president is hopeless as an arm-twister; the assumption of course was that being a good arm-twister was critical for a successful presidency.
***
Arm-twisting is a narrowly defined and seldom successful maneuver by which a president can supposedly work his will with the legislature. It assumes that an elected official will cry uncle and change his or her mind upon being visited with presidential blandishments and threats: If you vote this way I will see to it that you get that dam. Or the other way around. Or: If you dont vote for me on this I will make your life miserable for however long you are in office. Thats the popular image.