General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSOPA creator’s latest bill proposes stripping peer-review from science funding
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/04/29/sopa-creators-latest-bill-proposes-stripping-peer-review-from-science-funding/Smith, sponsor of the highly controversial Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) that threatened to fundamentally change how the Internet works, has long been a critic of the NSF grant process. In furtherance of those views, Smith recently conducted a hearing supposedly meant to consider how the grant approval process might be improved, an early indication that such a bill was forthcoming.
Another indication came in February, when Smith published an editorial in Roll Call describing how his vision of science funding is based not upon the impacts new research may have on the scientific community, but whether that research will create jobs. He went on to boast about how much of the House science committees $39 billion in agency budgets gets dumped onto nuclear, fracking and clean coal projects.
Smiths High Quality Research Act, scraps the NSFs current peer-review process, which solicits the opinions of independent experts as to the intellectual merit and broader impacts of proposed research. In its stead, a new set of non-scientific standards for science funding are proposed.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Warpy
(111,243 posts)and that's probably why this asshole wants to strip peer review from the process.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Would not have survived it in the USSR. Science projects were approved by the Politburo, not scientists.
I am reminded more and more of that
siligut
(12,272 posts)This is just another RW attempt to dumb down America.
pscot
(21,024 posts)Peer review discriminates against Christians, 'cause they got nothin.
Newest Reality
(12,712 posts)he represents seem to have discovered warped space, that's for sure.
That's how magical thinking dawns and flourishes. Not that I am against thinking magically, as long as it is for enjoyment rather than screwing-up everything for everyone simply because you don't understand nuance and abstractions.
I like to keep in mind that they are prone to being subject to well-placed, "magical thoughts".
Forge on, thinkers! Distract them with a six-foot rabbit.