Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
Mon Apr 29, 2013, 06:18 PM Apr 2013

Female DNA Found on Bomb in Boston Attack

Investigators have found female DNA on at least one of the bombs used in the Boston Marathon attacks, though they haven't determined whose DNA it is or whether that means a woman helped the two suspects carry out the attacks, according to U.S. officials briefed on the probe.

The officials familiar with the case cautioned that there could be multiple explanations for why the DNA of someone other than the two bombing suspects—Tamerlan Tsarnaev and his younger brother, Dzhokhar—could have been found on remnants of the exploded devices. The genetic material could have come, for example, from a store clerk who handled materials used in the bombs or a stray hair that ended up in the bomb.


http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323798104578453190708251284.html?mod=djemalertNEWS
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

tech3149

(4,452 posts)
1. forensic evidence is a wonderful tool but not absolute
Mon Apr 29, 2013, 06:44 PM
Apr 2013

It still takes good investigative skills and judgment to make a case on relevant evidence rather than chasing a bad interpretation of the evidence.

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
5. Wouldn't it likely be the daughter's?
Mon Apr 29, 2013, 07:41 PM
Apr 2013

The older brother was supposed to be taking care of his three year-old, and anyone who's ever done that would not be surprised that he would leave some of her DNA on him.

Now if they didn't find any male DNA, that would be interesting. But odds surely are that it's either the daughter's or the wife's, and in either case, it would prove nothing. You would expect that everyone leaving together, using the same car, etc, would leave some fragments of their DNA around and that it could easily end up on another family member.

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
7. It somewhat depends on what contained the DNA and where it was found
Mon Apr 29, 2013, 08:08 PM
Apr 2013

A bit of blood or skin on shrapnel or circuit board would be different from a random hair or a smear of kid snot on the pressure cooker.

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
8. I guess I just assumed it was from a hair
Mon Apr 29, 2013, 08:15 PM
Apr 2013

You couldn't use the shrapnel - it would have to be from the "unexpelled" contents.

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
9. Not sure there would be unexpelled contents, since the lid was retrieved from the roof of a building
Mon Apr 29, 2013, 08:17 PM
Apr 2013

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
11. There was one unexploded bomb at the scene of the shootout.
Mon Apr 29, 2013, 08:28 PM
Apr 2013

I believe they detonated it, but they may have done so in a way which preserves more of the contents.

If it's from one of the original bombs, I know I saw a picture of probably the bottom of pressure cooker in partial remnants of the knapsack. To be useful as evidence, any DNA would have to be found localized in the original wrappings, container, etc. Otherwise there is very little value, because there's not a close enough tie. If you found a strange bit of DNA from a hunk of bomb that's been flying through the crowd, you'd have a hard time even getting a court order for DNA testing on the wife and daughter. Too remote.

I can't believe we're having a conversation on DU about recovering DNA evidence from a bomb, but hey, that's just part of the surreality of it all. Who bombs a FOOT RACE anyway? I'm sure I'm not the only one having these moments.

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
14. Not really. Tamarlan could have DNA from his wife/daughter's shedded skin cells,
Mon Apr 29, 2013, 09:52 PM
Apr 2013

which he could have passed on to a circuit board as easily as to a pressure cooker.

egduj

(805 posts)
16. I'm not understanding the significance of this.
Mon Apr 29, 2013, 10:02 PM
Apr 2013

Since many of the victims were female, why would there NOT be female DNA on the bomb debris?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Female DNA Found on Bomb ...