General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFemale DNA Found on Bomb in Boston Attack
Investigators have found female DNA on at least one of the bombs used in the Boston Marathon attacks, though they haven't determined whose DNA it is or whether that means a woman helped the two suspects carry out the attacks, according to U.S. officials briefed on the probe.
The officials familiar with the case cautioned that there could be multiple explanations for why the DNA of someone other than the two bombing suspectsTamerlan Tsarnaev and his younger brother, Dzhokharcould have been found on remnants of the exploded devices. The genetic material could have come, for example, from a store clerk who handled materials used in the bombs or a stray hair that ended up in the bomb.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323798104578453190708251284.html?mod=djemalertNEWS
tech3149
(4,452 posts)It still takes good investigative skills and judgment to make a case on relevant evidence rather than chasing a bad interpretation of the evidence.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Just an interesting twist, I suppose.
randome
(34,845 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Quantess
(27,630 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)LOL!
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)Yo_Mama
(8,303 posts)The older brother was supposed to be taking care of his three year-old, and anyone who's ever done that would not be surprised that he would leave some of her DNA on him.
Now if they didn't find any male DNA, that would be interesting. But odds surely are that it's either the daughter's or the wife's, and in either case, it would prove nothing. You would expect that everyone leaving together, using the same car, etc, would leave some fragments of their DNA around and that it could easily end up on another family member.
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)A bit of blood or skin on shrapnel or circuit board would be different from a random hair or a smear of kid snot on the pressure cooker.
Yo_Mama
(8,303 posts)You couldn't use the shrapnel - it would have to be from the "unexpelled" contents.
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)Yo_Mama
(8,303 posts)I believe they detonated it, but they may have done so in a way which preserves more of the contents.
If it's from one of the original bombs, I know I saw a picture of probably the bottom of pressure cooker in partial remnants of the knapsack. To be useful as evidence, any DNA would have to be found localized in the original wrappings, container, etc. Otherwise there is very little value, because there's not a close enough tie. If you found a strange bit of DNA from a hunk of bomb that's been flying through the crowd, you'd have a hard time even getting a court order for DNA testing on the wife and daughter. Too remote.
I can't believe we're having a conversation on DU about recovering DNA evidence from a bomb, but hey, that's just part of the surreality of it all. Who bombs a FOOT RACE anyway? I'm sure I'm not the only one having these moments.
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)which he could have passed on to a circuit board as easily as to a pressure cooker.
MineralMan
(146,286 posts)pnwmom
(108,976 posts)egduj
(805 posts)Since many of the victims were female, why would there NOT be female DNA on the bomb debris?