Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Robb

(39,665 posts)
Sun Apr 28, 2013, 10:51 AM Apr 2013

"He has voted to ban semi-automatic rifles, pistols and shotguns...."

"He has attempted to make it a federal crime to purchase more than two handguns in a year."




"He has proposed 21-day waiting periods on all gun purchases."




"He has made several attempts to ban centerfire hunting ammunition. When his gun and ammunition bans failed, he fought tooth and nail to protect the gun control lobby’s schemes to bankrupt the American firearm industry."




Who could it be? Some gun-grabbing fringe nutcase, right?

"It’s safe to say that there is not a single outrageous anti-gun position Ted Kennedy has failed to support in his long career."
-- Chris Cox, NRA Institute for Legislative Action, on Ted Kennedy's announcement of his 2008 endorsement of Barack Obama.




We still miss you, Senator. And we're not finished.
70 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"He has voted to ban semi-automatic rifles, pistols and shotguns...." (Original Post) Robb Apr 2013 OP
I'll give you a kick before it drops off the 1st page. aikoaiko Apr 2013 #1
Other than his stance on gun control, premium Apr 2013 #2
Yeah, it's a shame that his position was so extreme Orrex Apr 2013 #3
Me too. premium Apr 2013 #5
He was a great champion for America. Period. baldguy Apr 2013 #9
It does not diminish his memory and cheapen his accomplishments. premium Apr 2013 #12
It's not extreme when the majority of Americans support it. baldguy Apr 2013 #19
Back when he proposed those measures, premium Apr 2013 #20
So, by your lights anyone who supported marraige equality 3 or 5 yrs ago is an extremist. baldguy Apr 2013 #22
You've got to be kidding me, right? premium Apr 2013 #26
Your hit&run attack post failed. baldguy Apr 2013 #36
OK. nt. premium Apr 2013 #40
No, it's you billh58 Apr 2013 #46
OK. premium Apr 2013 #50
The majority of American's do not support banning all semi-auto firearms. justanidea Apr 2013 #31
The Majority I'm Told otohara Apr 2013 #39
Get back to me when your two brothers are gunned down in cold blood. Ikonoklast Apr 2013 #60
How do you know I haven't had personal tragedy strike my family? premium Apr 2013 #61
Who's asking for argument? Ikonoklast Apr 2013 #62
Maybe, I don't know, premium Apr 2013 #64
Using a gun was his most expedient choice. Ikonoklast Apr 2013 #65
I wholeheartedly agree with you. premium Apr 2013 #70
So right! There are no 'buts.' tblue Apr 2013 #14
There are differences of opinions, premium Apr 2013 #18
You and your billh58 Apr 2013 #47
I've stated what I believe are sane gun control measures premium Apr 2013 #51
He saw firsthand what some loser with an easily accessible gun can do. You guys don't care Hoyt Apr 2013 #52
Uh huh. See post #51. nt. premium Apr 2013 #53
Post removed Post removed Apr 2013 #54
I think it's right wingers who post the car BS. Hoyt Apr 2013 #55
Whoosh, premium Apr 2013 #56
Now that WinniSkipper has billh58 Apr 2013 #66
Maybe so, but your ahole gun buddy is gone, for now. Hoyt Apr 2013 #67
No it is billh58 Apr 2013 #58
The interesting part is WinniSkipper Apr 2013 #59
These "cold dead hands" billh58 Apr 2013 #57
Umm, no. I supported Two and wished he had made a presidential run... Eleanors38 Apr 2013 #43
Isn't Any Postion on Guns Too Extreme otohara Apr 2013 #33
You have your opinion, premium Apr 2013 #34
You hit the nail billh58 Apr 2013 #48
k&r... spanone Apr 2013 #4
Nothing wrong with his gun votes. He should have had the chance to vote on annual byeya Apr 2013 #6
Even as a nationally-known Senator, he was a victim of a national list, AnotherMcIntosh Apr 2013 #7
Are you fucking kidding me? Robb Apr 2013 #13
No, he is billh58 Apr 2013 #49
All of the positions quoted seem incredibly REASONABLE to me. AndyA Apr 2013 #8
^^ this loyalsister Apr 2013 #10
+1000 ellisonz Apr 2013 #11
+1000 more. calimary Apr 2013 #23
What you call UREASONABLE attitude, premium Apr 2013 #15
Do you know what centerfire rifle ammo is? AtheistCrusader Apr 2013 #16
Don't start distracting with the "technical minutiae" now sylvi Apr 2013 #68
He also wanted to ban the .30-30 (rimfire) AtheistCrusader Apr 2013 #69
Ted should have been Majority Leader.... Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2013 #17
Wanted to ban hunting ammunition Chuuku Davis Apr 2013 #21
Can you tell us the legislation, and the difference? Robb Apr 2013 #24
Welcome to DU, Chuuku Davis! calimary Apr 2013 #27
Don't know your position on banning guns... Eleanors38 Apr 2013 #44
"several attempts to ban centerfire hunting ammunition." Why? hack89 Apr 2013 #25
That's how the NRA framed it. Robb Apr 2013 #28
This message was self-deleted by its author hack89 Apr 2013 #35
"bullets that could pierce police armor" NickB79 Apr 2013 #37
Actually it was a ban on certain types of rifle ammunition hack89 Apr 2013 #38
K & R malaise Apr 2013 #29
A life formed through tragedy gets the point and endorsed PBO. Thanks, Senator Kennedy. freshwest Apr 2013 #30
Yes, freshwest.. and from Victoria Kennedy Cha Apr 2013 #41
After so many death threats made across the country and to all of my representatives, freshwest Apr 2013 #42
Since the Kennedy family suffered two well known occurrences of gun violence, Ted spoke from his own Thinkingabout Apr 2013 #32
Ted Kennedy. timdog44 Apr 2013 #45
Indeed In_The_Wind Apr 2013 #63

aikoaiko

(34,169 posts)
1. I'll give you a kick before it drops off the 1st page.
Sun Apr 28, 2013, 11:07 AM
Apr 2013

I miss Ted Kennedy, but not because if his positions on gun laws.
 

premium

(3,731 posts)
2. Other than his stance on gun control,
Sun Apr 28, 2013, 11:09 AM
Apr 2013

Last edited Sun Apr 28, 2013, 01:59 PM - Edit history (1)

He was a great champion for the 99%'ers, he is truly missed.

Orrex

(63,203 posts)
3. Yeah, it's a shame that his position was so extreme
Sun Apr 28, 2013, 11:54 AM
Apr 2013

I would like for his position to be the mainstream.

 

premium

(3,731 posts)
5. Me too.
Sun Apr 28, 2013, 12:00 PM
Apr 2013

Sen. Ted Kennedy left us far, far too soon, he was always for the little person.
His family's story was one of such tragedy and it goes to his stamina and fortitude to carry on in politics and become such a stalwart man of the people.

I may have disagreed with his position on firearms, but I agreed with just about every other position that was near and dear to him.

R.I.P. Sen. Kennedy.

 

baldguy

(36,649 posts)
9. He was a great champion for America. Period.
Sun Apr 28, 2013, 12:45 PM
Apr 2013

His position on reasonable gun control was an essential part of that. Any attempt to qualify his record to say "Other for that..." diminishes his memory and cheapens his accomplishments..

 

premium

(3,731 posts)
12. It does not diminish his memory and cheapen his accomplishments.
Sun Apr 28, 2013, 12:49 PM
Apr 2013

I disagreed with what you call his reasonable position on gun control, I call it extreme, that's my opinion which is different than yours.

Other than his position on gun control, he was a champion for America and the 99%'ers.

We can have a difference of opinion without the rancor.

 

baldguy

(36,649 posts)
19. It's not extreme when the majority of Americans support it.
Sun Apr 28, 2013, 01:06 PM
Apr 2013

And it's ironically helpful for you to ask for no rancor when you're trying to tarnish Kennedy's memory.

 

premium

(3,731 posts)
20. Back when he proposed those measures,
Sun Apr 28, 2013, 01:13 PM
Apr 2013

the majority of Americans didn't support them.

I'm not tarnishing his reputation, you're being a little extreme here, I have a difference of opinion on gun control than he did, that's not tarnishing his reputation, it's a difference of opinion, nothing more, nothing less.

You may not agree with my position on gun control, fine, that's your right, just like I don't agree with yours or the late Sen. Kennedy's position on gun control.

 

baldguy

(36,649 posts)
22. So, by your lights anyone who supported marraige equality 3 or 5 yrs ago is an extremist.
Sun Apr 28, 2013, 01:19 PM
Apr 2013

So anything they have to say on the subject should be dismissed. How can you pretend that's not tarnishing their reputation?

This is nothing more than the standard RW looney attack on anyone named "Kennedy". Stop trying to pretend otherwise.

 

premium

(3,731 posts)
26. You've got to be kidding me, right?
Sun Apr 28, 2013, 01:25 PM
Apr 2013

You've really jumped the shark on this one.



We're done here.

 

otohara

(24,135 posts)
39. The Majority I'm Told
Sun Apr 28, 2013, 07:11 PM
Apr 2013

by all the gun nuts is that we don't know shit about guns.

So how would the majority of American's even know what the heck a semi-auto is?
The AS50 looks pretty fucking scary and unless you're a navy seal .... just saying

Ikonoklast

(23,973 posts)
60. Get back to me when your two brothers are gunned down in cold blood.
Mon Apr 29, 2013, 12:10 PM
Apr 2013

See how you feel about gun control then.

Bet it gets pretty 'extreme', too.

 

premium

(3,731 posts)
61. How do you know I haven't had personal tragedy strike my family?
Mon Apr 29, 2013, 12:15 PM
Apr 2013

I have, I just don't talk about it and I sure as hell don't blame a piece of metal, I blame the asshole how brought pain and suffering to my family.
Too nice of a day to get into an argument with you.
Have a great day.

Ikonoklast

(23,973 posts)
62. Who's asking for argument?
Mon Apr 29, 2013, 12:22 PM
Apr 2013

If the person that caused your family harm didn't have a firearm, would the tragedy have happened?

 

premium

(3,731 posts)
64. Maybe, I don't know,
Mon Apr 29, 2013, 12:32 PM
Apr 2013

the asshole could've had a knife, a baseball bat, a pair of scissors, whatever.
Just for the record, it was a close cousin of mine, someone I grew up with, he walked in on a burglary in his home and the dickhead shot him in the head.
This piece of scum shouldn't have even been out of jail, he had an arrest record as long as my arm, some of his convictions were for violent offenses, so, in part, I also blame the justice system for it's failure to keep scum like him off the streets.

At least he was caught, convicted and sent to prison for the rest of his miserable fucking life, but like I said, I don't blame the object of his demise, I blame the asshole who murdered him.

I have such an empty spot in my heart and still tear up whenever I think of him even though it was more than 5 years ago.

Ikonoklast

(23,973 posts)
65. Using a gun was his most expedient choice.
Mon Apr 29, 2013, 01:45 PM
Apr 2013

But I agree, he was going to use violence no matter what, he seemed to be the type of person whose entire life is a horror show for those that come into contact with him.

I would empty every prison in this country of drug offenders, get them in a treatment program, and fill it up with repeat violent offenders.

Do a crime with a gun, or other deadly weapon? Twenty years mandatory, no parole.

I am sorry for your loss.

I have also lost family to gun violence.

 

premium

(3,731 posts)
70. I wholeheartedly agree with you.
Mon Apr 29, 2013, 09:17 PM
Apr 2013

Empty the prisons of non violent drug offenders, end this insane WOD, and sentence every gun crime to very stiff prison sentences.

Thank you and I too, am sorry for your loss. It's rough, they say time heals all wounds, I say, bullshit, time may dull the pain, but it never heals it.

tblue

(16,350 posts)
14. So right! There are no 'buts.'
Sun Apr 28, 2013, 12:52 PM
Apr 2013

What a gem he was. Fearless and principled and unapologetically progressive, unlike so many in Washington.

 

premium

(3,731 posts)
18. There are differences of opinions,
Sun Apr 28, 2013, 01:06 PM
Apr 2013

and this was my difference of opinion with him.
Other than that, I agreed with every other major issue he championed.

billh58

(6,635 posts)
47. You and your
Mon Apr 29, 2013, 10:50 AM
Apr 2013

Gunner buddies have "differences of opinion" with ALL Democrats who support sane gun control measures.

 

premium

(3,731 posts)
51. I've stated what I believe are sane gun control measures
Mon Apr 29, 2013, 11:27 AM
Apr 2013

several times, look them up, or don't, I really don't give a flying damn and I'm not going to get into a pissing match with you over this, too nice of a day to argue with someone who won't see that there are legitimate differences of opinion on issues.
Have a good day.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
52. He saw firsthand what some loser with an easily accessible gun can do. You guys don't care
Mon Apr 29, 2013, 11:29 AM
Apr 2013

as long as you have yours close by.

Response to Hoyt (Reply #52)

billh58

(6,635 posts)
66. Now that WinniSkipper has
Mon Apr 29, 2013, 01:52 PM
Apr 2013

been tombstoned, do you and your Gungeon buddies still think that his Chappaquiddick "joke" is funny?

billh58

(6,635 posts)
58. No it is
Mon Apr 29, 2013, 12:07 PM
Apr 2013

you right-wing NRA apologists who try the "apples to oranges" bullshit to equate automobile deaths to guns deaths.

And the underhanded reference to Chappaquiddick is something only a right-winger would bring up in a conversation about Edward Kennedy, or the Kennedy family.

billh58

(6,635 posts)
57. These "cold dead hands"
Mon Apr 29, 2013, 12:00 PM
Apr 2013

NRA-apologists don't give a rat's ass about the pain and misery caused by guns in this country. They want unfettered access to guns, and absolutely no accountability for the fucking things.

Over in the Gungeon they're laughing it up about how they are "winning the war on sanity" and really, really showing the "grabbers" how stupid they are. "If only they would listen to us," they say, "we could show them how to get really, really weak gun legislation passed."

All the "grabbers" need to do, they say, is to kiss the NRA's ass, vote for Blue Dog DLC fucking DINOs, and don't worry about a few "friendly fire" causalities.

And they have the audacity to complain that the non-NRA majority of Americans are "extremists." Karl Rove, the Koch Brothers, Wayne LaPierre, and the rest of the GOP hate machine are so very proud of their NRA disciples and puppets that they just may let them have an extra portion of gruel for dinner tonight.

 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
43. Umm, no. I supported Two and wished he had made a presidential run...
Mon Apr 29, 2013, 01:03 AM
Apr 2013

even though his gun ban policies were extremist.

 

otohara

(24,135 posts)
33. Isn't Any Postion on Guns Too Extreme
Sun Apr 28, 2013, 01:56 PM
Apr 2013

to gun nuts in America's gun culture?

Part of being a champion to the 99%ers, is keeping us safe from harm.
Only guns are off limits when it comes to regulating - there is no safe gun so why fucking bother.





billh58

(6,635 posts)
48. You hit the nail
Mon Apr 29, 2013, 10:52 AM
Apr 2013

squarely on the head. It's always comical to hear a NRA-apologist gunner call someone else an "extremist."

 

byeya

(2,842 posts)
6. Nothing wrong with his gun votes. He should have had the chance to vote on annual
Sun Apr 28, 2013, 12:36 PM
Apr 2013

federal taxes on firearms and mandatory safe storage and handling of same along with outlawing gun shows.

 

AnotherMcIntosh

(11,064 posts)
7. Even as a nationally-known Senator, he was a victim of a national list,
Sun Apr 28, 2013, 12:42 PM
Apr 2013

Last edited Sun Apr 28, 2013, 01:23 PM - Edit history (1)

the no-fly list.

One of the most admirable traits of Ted Kennedy is that he was a liberal. Just as the ACLU is opposed to a national registry, in the absence of information, no one should invoke Ted Kennedy's name and claim that he would be in favor of a national registry.

Can you count on national lists and employees like those working at the TSA?

With respect to the nationally known Ted Kennedy, in two months alone, he was stopped five times
from boarding planes in a normal manner by TSA agents and their no-fly list.

"Instead of acknowledging the craggy-faced, silver-haired septuagenarian as the Congressional leader whose face has flashed across the nation's television sets for decades, the airline agents acted as if they had stumbled across a fanatic who might blow up an American airplane. Mr. Kennedy said they refused to give him his ticket.

"He said, 'We can't give it to you,' " Mr. Kennedy said, describing an encounter with an airline agent to the rapt audience. " 'You can't buy a ticket to go on the airline to Boston.' I said, 'Well, why not?' He said, 'We can't tell you.' "

"Tried to get on a plane back to Washington," Mr. Kennedy continued. '' 'You can't get on the plane.' I went up to the desk and said, 'I've been getting on this plane, you know, for 42 years. Why can't I get on the plane?' "

The hearing room erupted in laughter.

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/20/national/20flight.html


If the TSA was not interested in giving free feel-ups, and didn't regularly screw-up like they did with Ted Kennedy, they might have greater credibility.

For anyone who believes that another national list is going to make us all feel more secure, can you honestly say that there are no employees like the TSA employees who just like to screw with people?

The headline claims that Ted Kennedy voted to BAN semi-automatic rifles, pistols and shotguns (emphasis added).

Any attempt that he made to make it a federal crime to purchase more than two handguns in a year, even if true, was not a vote "to ban semi-automatic rifles, pistols and shotguns" as indicated in the headline.

Any offer of a "proposed 21-day waiting periods on all gun purchases" was not a vote "to ban semi-automatic rifles, pistols and shotguns" as indicated in the headline.

It's claimed that he made "several attempts to ban centerfire hunting ammunition." Even if true, no such attempts were a vote "to ban semi-automatic rifles, pistols and shotguns" as indicated in the headline.

So you quote from an NRA spokesman does not indicate that Ted Kennedy voted "to ban semi-automatic rifles, pistols and shotguns" as indicated in the headline. That does not establish that he did so.

AndyA

(16,993 posts)
8. All of the positions quoted seem incredibly REASONABLE to me.
Sun Apr 28, 2013, 12:42 PM
Apr 2013

What's UNREASONABLE is the attitude that there's something wrong with Sen. Kennedy's support on this issue.

K&R

 

premium

(3,731 posts)
15. What you call UREASONABLE attitude,
Sun Apr 28, 2013, 12:53 PM
Apr 2013

many of us call difference of opinion. We are still allowed to have a difference of opinions.

 

sylvi

(813 posts)
68. Don't start distracting with the "technical minutiae" now
Mon Apr 29, 2013, 02:03 PM
Apr 2013

Just because it comprise 99% of all hunting rifle ammo.

calimary

(81,220 posts)
27. Welcome to DU, Chuuku Davis!
Sun Apr 28, 2013, 01:25 PM
Apr 2013

Good to have you with us.

Hunting? Meh... somebody can always come up with an exception. But the problem with that is - while our reps are all noodling around with this exception and that exception and this fine print and that fine print - THEN NOTHING GETS DONE. We're still left with NOTHING DONE, and NOTHING SOLVED, and NO STEPS TAKEN AT ALL!!!!!

My question still is - "... and so, then we do nothing???????"

 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
44. Don't know your position on banning guns...
Mon Apr 29, 2013, 01:21 AM
Apr 2013

But if one starts with that approach, then there better be specificity at least to the degree of convincing definitions. This is a chief reason why bans are "worked around" (see AWB, 1994). Not to mention political opposition.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
25. "several attempts to ban centerfire hunting ammunition." Why?
Sun Apr 28, 2013, 01:23 PM
Apr 2013

He really wanted to ban all rifle ammunition larger than a .22lr?

Robb

(39,665 posts)
28. That's how the NRA framed it.
Sun Apr 28, 2013, 01:28 PM
Apr 2013

He actually proposed an amendment to the "no lawsuits against manufacturers of arms" bill that would exclude anyone who made bullets that could pierce police armor.

Not a "ban" at all. But that's the NRA for ya.

Response to Robb (Reply #28)

NickB79

(19,233 posts)
37. "bullets that could pierce police armor"
Sun Apr 28, 2013, 02:28 PM
Apr 2013

Which would be any centerfire deer rifle manufactured in the past 100 years.

A .30-30 lever action rifle made in 1890 will punch through a police officer's Kevlar vest.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
38. Actually it was a ban on certain types of rifle ammunition
Sun Apr 28, 2013, 03:30 PM
Apr 2013

his amendment was to expand the definition of armor piercing ammunition in Section 921(a)(17)(B) of title 18, United States Code. When you read Section 922, you see that it is illegal to make or import armor piercing ammunition.

Here is part of his proposed amendment:

(iv) a projectile for a center-fire rifle, designed or marketed as having armor piercing capability, that the Attorney General determines, under section 926(d), to be more likely to penetrate body armor than standard ammunition of the same caliber.''.

(b) DETERMINATION OF THE CAPABILITY OF PROJECTILES TO PENETRATE BODY ARMOR.--Section 926 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

``(3) As used in paragraph (1), the term `Body Armor Exemplar' means body armor that the Attorney General determines meets minimum standards for the protection of law enforcement officers.''.


http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/C?r109:./temp/~r109pXp1Qt

The question was over the term "designed" - any center-fire bullet will penetrate a typical police vest. The wording of the amendment was sufficiently vague enough to give the NRA an opening to oppose it. He should have simply expanded the definition to explicitly say that hunting ammo was not included. A perfect example of where precise technical definitions would have been useful.

I personally don't see the wording as banning hunting ammo but it was enough for the NRA and could have been anticipated.

Cha

(297,180 posts)
41. Yes, freshwest.. and from Victoria Kennedy
Mon Apr 29, 2013, 12:07 AM
Apr 2013

Statement of Victoria Reggie Kennedy, President of the Edward M. Kennedy Institute Board, on the 2nd Anniversary of the Signing of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Today [March 23, 2012] is the second anniversary of President Obama’s signing the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and making health care reform the law of the land.

Presidents had tried for 100 years to reform health care in this country. Congress had tried. My husband Ted Kennedy called reforming health care and making it affordable and accessible the cause of his life. But President Obama was the president who made it happen. And because of his leadership and the hard work of the Congress of the United States, millions of Americans have experienced first-hand the important benefits and economic security it provides.

http://emkinstitute.org/updates/entry/anniversary-of-healthcare-signing

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
42. After so many death threats made across the country and to all of my representatives,
Mon Apr 29, 2013, 12:28 AM
Apr 2013
with Tea Party terrorists trying to intimidate Town Halls, media telling non-stop lies, it was signed.

I see many faces I recognize there, who worked to make this a reality. It will evolve, after saving lives and giving peace to many Americans.

The work is not over as the same opposition will continue to it and all forms of equality. Because that is what it stands for after all is said and done.

There were so many poison pills for private insurance companies, some have only hit year, thus their well-funded disinformation campaign. I believe a progressive majority will bring Medicare4All or a universal plan.

Thanks, Cha, for her words and that picture. I'd never seen it.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
32. Since the Kennedy family suffered two well known occurrences of gun violence, Ted spoke from his own
Sun Apr 28, 2013, 01:50 PM
Apr 2013

experiences of which many of the rest of the nation has not lived with. Could it have prevented his brothers from being killed, don't know and don't think many others could or could not say what might have happened. He championed many subjects, did not back down to those who may not have agreed with him. A great Senator who knew how to work toward goals. Thank you Ted Kennedy for all the effort you put forth for the American public.

timdog44

(1,388 posts)
45. Ted Kennedy.
Mon Apr 29, 2013, 08:06 AM
Apr 2013

Proof of what a true champion of the people can be. Proof that people with wealth "can" be compassionate and "can" be for the work a day man. I am glad to have been alive when he was.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"He has voted to ban semi...