General Discussion

Beaverhausen

(24,470 posts) Sat Apr 27, 2013, 10:54 PM Apr 2013

Scalia is sitting at Fox's table?

Oh for gods sake!!!

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Scalia is sitting at Fox's table? (Original Post) Beaverhausen Apr 2013 OP

It would appear that way. Of course, it's just coincidence The Velveteen Ocelot Apr 2013 #1

And Conan's remark OldHippieChick Apr 2013 #2

*Excellent* zinger, and the a-hole/SCALIA didn't laugh, it means it hurt. n/t UTUSN Apr 2013 #5

Maybe we do need term limits on the Supremes. 25 years sounds good. reformist2 Apr 2013 #3

Geesh could they be any more fucking obvious! nt Raine Apr 2013 #4

I know. It's in your face brazen, but dare ask them if he's partisan, he'll lie BlueCaliDem Apr 2013 #8

Did you notice that the only time scalia smiled was when bill's russspeakeasy Apr 2013 #6

It was truly inappropriate frazzled Apr 2013 #7

I swear.. defacto7 Apr 2013 #9

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,656 posts)

1. It would appear that way. Of course, it's just coincidence

Reply to Beaverhausen (Original post)

Sat Apr 27, 2013, 10:56 PM

Apr 2013

and Scalia will always be completely impartial.

OldHippieChick

(2,434 posts)

2. And Conan's remark

Reply to Beaverhausen (Original post)

Sat Apr 27, 2013, 11:02 PM

Apr 2013

about why we don't understand why the Supreme Court doesn't endorse gay marriage when Scalia and Thomas are such a marriage! Loved it!

UTUSN

(70,671 posts)

5. *Excellent* zinger, and the a-hole/SCALIA didn't laugh, it means it hurt. n/t

Reply to OldHippieChick (Reply #2)

Sat Apr 27, 2013, 11:13 PM

Apr 2013

reformist2

(9,841 posts)

3. Maybe we do need term limits on the Supremes. 25 years sounds good.

Reply to Beaverhausen (Original post)

Sat Apr 27, 2013, 11:05 PM

Apr 2013

Raine

(30,540 posts)

4. Geesh could they be any more fucking obvious! nt

Reply to Beaverhausen (Original post)

Sat Apr 27, 2013, 11:13 PM

Apr 2013

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)

8. I know. It's in your face brazen, but dare ask them if he's partisan, he'll lie

Reply to Raine (Reply #4)

Sun Apr 28, 2013, 12:28 AM

Apr 2013

with a straight face and answer with, "No", and then chuckle thinking what a bunch of backward dopes we are.

russspeakeasy

(6,539 posts)

6. Did you notice that the only time scalia smiled was when bill's

Reply to Beaverhausen (Original post)

Sat Apr 27, 2013, 11:44 PM

Apr 2013

hand went under the table ? I think that's what I saw...in fact, I'm sure.

frazzled

(18,402 posts)

7. It was truly inappropriate

Reply to Beaverhausen (Original post)

Sat Apr 27, 2013, 11:48 PM

Apr 2013

Can you imagine the outrage if Ruth Bader Ginsberg came as the guest of MSNBC, sitting between Rachel and the Reverend Al?

defacto7

(13,485 posts)

9. I swear..

Reply to Beaverhausen (Original post)

Sun Apr 28, 2013, 12:45 AM

Apr 2013

Scalia is a megalomaniac. Enjoying his visions of grandeur.

Reply to this discussion