Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSteve Lynch jumps on the bandwagon of Faux concerning welfare benefits to the Boston bombers
Frankly, I started with very little sympathy for Lynch for political reasons. At this point, I think this goes to character.
http://www.esquire.com/blogs/politics/massachusetts-democratic-senate-primary-vote-042613
Steve Lynch Goes For Broke
By Charles P. Pierce
at 3:15pm
I have reasons, both personal and professional, and a serious combination of both, to vote for Edward Markey over Steve Lynch in next week's Democratic senatorial primary here in the Commonwealth (God save it!). I used to think I could live with a Lynch win, but, as soon as he jumped on the latest fauxtrage bandwagon, he was pretty much dead to me as a candidate.
After those revelations, Massachusetts state agencies refused to provide any more information, citing the dead man's right to privacy. A Democratic congressman from Massachusetts chided the administration of Democratic Gov. Deval Patrick. "It's certainly relevant information that should be made public," U.S. Rep. Stephen F. Lynch, D-Mass., told the Herald. "There's a national security interest, No. 1. Secondly, there's also a public interest in finding out whether these individuals were able to exploit the system and get benefits they weren't entitled to."
Oh, please, Steve. This is a desperate bid to lock up the votes of those putative Massachusetts Democrats who still read the Boston Herald and who still listen to talk radio, because you've pretty much lost everyone else. But I repeat myself. In the first place, if there really is a "national security interest" in what benefits Tamerlan Tsarnaev and his family may have received back in the days when nobody knew who the hell he was, the pages of our plucky little tabloid would seem to me to be the last place we'd want that bruited about. In the second place, unless you want to political benefits of arguing that welfare=terrorism, or welfare=cheat, there's no "public interest" in finding out whether the Tsarnaevs were exploiting the system. We are now into the they-won't-give-us-what-we-want-what-are-they-hiding? Joe on a carphone period of how we build a scandal these days. Steve Lynch has decided to grab it with both hands. That's a shame.
Read more: Massachusetts Democratic Senate Primary Vote - Steve Lynch Goes For Broke - Esquire
Follow us: @Esquiremag on Twitter | Esquire on Facebook
Visit us at Esquire.com
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 848 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Steve Lynch jumps on the bandwagon of Faux concerning welfare benefits to the Boston bombers (Original Post)
Mass
Apr 2013
OP
Mopar151
(9,974 posts)1. I think Steve Lynch is running to catch the bandwagon
OTOH, It's a legit piece of the puzzle. But it should'nt be taken out of context by the Boston Birdcage Liner.
Mass
(27,315 posts)2. Why is it a legit piece? I agree with Patrick in this.
I have found his public behavior since the beginning of this story extremely tacky, and frankly, all I hope is that he loses and then that people in his district kick him out. We can do better in MA.
Mopar151
(9,974 posts)3. How do you live large in Cambridge on part-time,under-the-table work ?
That's the legitimate question.
I have long been dissapointed in Rep. Lynch, but I have Sen. Ayotte to deal with "up noth". Not to mention Doofus Brown's threat to move north....
Cha
(296,775 posts)4. Doesn't seem like the brightest issue to grab on to in a Democratic
primary in Massachusetts.
In the second place, unless you want to political benefits of arguing that welfare=terrorism, or welfare=cheat, there's no "public interest" in finding out whether the Tsarnaevs were exploiting the system. We are now into the they-won't-give-us-what-we-want-what-are-they-hiding? Joe on a carphone period of how we build a scandal these days. Steve Lynch has decided to grab it with both hands. That's a shame.
thanks Mass