Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
Fri Apr 26, 2013, 05:57 PM Apr 2013

"Bill Moyers interview on Boston Marathon bombing" (April 26) Video/Transcript

Bill Moyers interview on Boston Marathon bombing

Talking to the PBS host about civil liberties, terrorism, US foreign policy and the dangers of secrecy


Time constraints are preventing me from writing much today, but the full 25-minute interview I did with Bill Moyers, to air beginning this evening on PBS, is now available on the recorder below. We discuss the Boston Marathon bombing, terrorism and civil liberties, the dangers of secrecy, US foreign policy and general issues relating to US political and media culture:
UPDATE

Courtesy of commenter axenicely, the transcript to this interview is here.
April 26, 2013
Full Show: Trading Democracy for ‘National Security’

BILL MOYERS: Welcome. In the aftermath of the Boston bombings and the massive manhunt which led to the death of one suspect and the arrest of another, both of them Muslims, there have been calls for increased surveillance and scrutiny of the public at large and Muslims in particular.

On Fox News the other day, New York congressman Peter King said: “If you know a threat is coming from a certain community, that's where you have to look." Proceed with caution here, Mr. King. And first take a look at that “Council on Foreign Relations” analysis of an FBI study showing that from 1980 to 2001, around two-thirds of domestic terrorism was carried out by American extremists who were not Muslims. That number actually skyrocketed to 95 percent in the years immediately after 9/11. And the magazine “Mother Jones” found that of the 62 mass shootings in America since 1982 – mass killings defined as four deaths or more – 44 of the killers were white males.

My guest, the journalist and columnist Glenn Greenwald, was flying here from his home in Brazil as events in Boston were unfolding. The investigation once again raised issues of civil liberties in the fight against terrorists. So, we reached out to Glenn Greenwald, who, as a former constitutional and civil rights litigator, keeps his critical and contrarian eye on potential conflicts between national security and individual liberty.

Among his best-selling books: How Would a Patriot Act?And most recently: With Liberty and Justice for Some: How the Law Is Used to Destroy Equality and Protect the Powerful. Currently, Glenn Greenwald writes regularly for The Guardian. You can read him on their website. Welcome, Glenn. It's good to see you again.

GLENN GREENWALD: Great to be back.

BILL MOYERS: Was it right, in your opinion, for the suspect in Boston to be charged as a criminal rather than an enemy combatant?

GLENN GREENWALD: Absolutely. There were very few people who even took seriously the idea that he ought to be charged as an enemy combatant for many reasons, including the fact that he's an American citizen on US soil. And if there's one thing we're taught to think about our country, it's that the government can't punish people or put them in cages or threaten them with death without charging them with a crime, giving them a trial with a jury of their peers, and then convicting them beyond a reasonable doubt.

But the broader question is, should we change or radically alter or dismantle our standard protocols of justice in the name of terrorism. That's been the debate we've been having since the September 11th attack. And I'm firmly in the camp that we need not and should not do that. And therefore he should be treated like any other criminal.

BILL MOYERS: If it turns out that he and his brother had some significant contact with a radical organization back in their home country, would that change anything in your mind?

GLENN GREENWALD: Well, I think that the most important thing that we need to start asking and if that were the case, this question would become even more urgent, is why is it that there seem to be so many people from so many different parts of the world willing to risk their lives or their liberty in order to bring violence to the United States, including to random Americans whom they don't know. There has to be something very compelling that drives somebody to do that. And this was the question that was asked in the wake of the 9/11 attack in the form of the sort of iconic question, "Why do they hate us?" And the government needed to answer that question because people were quite rightly asking. And the answer that was fed to them was, "Well, they hate us for our freedom."

And I think ten years, 11 years later, people are very cynical about that answer and realize that's not really the reason. Because what you see is that people from parts of the world that weren't part of 9/11 are now starting to attack the United States as well.

And when they're heard, which is rare, but sometimes they are, about what their motive was, invariably, they cite the fact that they have become so enraged by what Americans are doing to Muslims around the world, to their countries in terms of bombing them, imprisoning them without charges, drone attacking them, interfering in their governments, propping up their dictators that they feel that they have not only the right but the duty to attack America back. And so I think the discourse then ought to really be focused on what is driving this war. How is it that we can do something that will, instead of perpetuating it further and exacerbate it further, start to think about how to undermine and dilute the sentiments that continue to fuel it, you know, 12 years after the 9/11 attacks.

BILL MOYERS: You wrote the other day of America's “invisible victims.” And they are?

GLENN GREENWALD: The invisible victims are the women and children and innocent men who the United States continues to kill in places like tribal regions in Pakistan, in Yemen, in Somalia, in Afghanistan, at times in the Philippines. Places throughout the Muslim world where the United States sends flying robots.

We never hear about who those people are. And you can contrast it with the few instances in which the United States is attacked, we learn the names of the victims, we know their lives, we hear from how their family members are grieving, we never hear any of that in terms of the children, the women, and innocent men whom we kill.

In the Muslim world and it's sort of an "out of sight, out of mind" dynamic whereby not hearing about them, we never think about them. And by not thinking about them, we forget that they exist. And that's when somebody attacks the United States, it leads to this bewilderment, like, "Well, what have we ever done to anybody that would make them want to attack us?"

BILL MOYERS: I think you were traveling when the Boston siege was unfolding. Is that right? When did you--

GLENN GREENWALD: Right.

BILL MOYERS: When did you actually find out that it was happening?

http://billmoyers.com/wp-content/themes/billmoyers/transcript-print.php?post=29744


7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Bill Moyers interview on Boston Marathon bombing" (April 26) Video/Transcript (Original Post) KoKo Apr 2013 OP
Thanks for this malaise Apr 2013 #1
No wonder Mr. Greenwald is so viscerally hated 99th_Monkey Apr 2013 #2
Listening to this between Moyers and Glenn...was fascinating... KoKo Apr 2013 #3
One thing Greenwald's DU critics all seem to have in common 99th_Monkey Apr 2013 #4
a patriot..for real xiamiam Apr 2013 #5
...1 KoKo Apr 2013 #6
Okay...Guess Most DU'ers listened to Moyers on this..and decided it wasn't worthwhile? KoKo Apr 2013 #7
 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
2. No wonder Mr. Greenwald is so viscerally hated
Fri Apr 26, 2013, 06:21 PM
Apr 2013

by the 1% vampires. He apparently cannot be bought off, and has a level of
integrity, independence and insight that could potentially be dangerous to them,
the more people listen to him.

Thanks for the OP.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
3. Listening to this between Moyers and Glenn...was fascinating...
Fri Apr 26, 2013, 06:39 PM
Apr 2013

I don't know why Greenwald is so hated here on DU. Yet, Moyers retains a following.

It was worth the watch for me and glad that there are others here who found it interesting.

Our local PBS dropped Moyers show...so I have to find it on internet. I suspect others have had the same problem in some areas with Moyers being dropped so they don't get enlightened discussion.

Sad...

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
4. One thing Greenwald's DU critics all seem to have in common
Fri Apr 26, 2013, 07:00 PM
Apr 2013

is a snarky demeaner, backed-up by vacuous carefully crafted distortions
to try to besmirch Greenwald's reputation, revealing nothing of any real
substance in the final analysis.

xiamiam

(4,906 posts)
5. a patriot..for real
Fri Apr 26, 2013, 09:26 PM
Apr 2013

I just wish there were more like him. Thanks for posting this. Moyers and Greenwald are two of my favorites.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
7. Okay...Guess Most DU'ers listened to Moyers on this..and decided it wasn't worthwhile?
Sat Apr 27, 2013, 07:21 PM
Apr 2013
I thought it was pretty profound for thought...but...then..those interested already saw it...so I'ts OKAY!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Bill Moyers interview on...