Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat Deficit Reduction is Really About: Weakening Workers’ Bargaining Power
http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/04/24/what-deficit-reduction-is-really-about-weakening-workers-bargaining-power/What Deficit Reduction is Really About: Weakening Workers Bargaining Power
by DEAN BAKER
As a result, virtually all of the gains from productivity growth since the downturn have gone to employers. The after-tax profit share of national income is at the highest level since 1951. The rise in corporate profits had led to a booming stock market, which has recovered all the ground lost since the recession.
The list of losers in the current economic situation is much larger than the list of winners. There are a relatively small number of people who own substantial amounts of stock. The overwhelming majority of the non-retired population gets more income from their labor than stock ownership. These people are clear losers from the austerity being followed in the United States for the last three years.
Of course campaign contributions come disproportionately from the tiny segment of the population who do own large amounts of stock. As a result, the interests of the wealthy are likely to be the concerns of elected politicians even if they are opposed to the interests of the vast majority of the population. That is why we see efforts to cut programs such as Social Security and Medicare even when these cuts are opposed by large majorities of people across the political spectrum.
The news last week is that the new paper discrediting Reinhart and Rogoff made everything much clearer. The leadership of both major parties is not seeking ways to reduce the budget deficit because there is any reason to believe this will be good for the economy. They are looking for ways to reduce the budget deficit because the wealthy are happy to sustain a situation in which high unemployment weakens workers bargaining power. This does not paint a very positive picture of the state of democracy in the United States.
The list of losers in the current economic situation is much larger than the list of winners. There are a relatively small number of people who own substantial amounts of stock. The overwhelming majority of the non-retired population gets more income from their labor than stock ownership. These people are clear losers from the austerity being followed in the United States for the last three years.
Of course campaign contributions come disproportionately from the tiny segment of the population who do own large amounts of stock. As a result, the interests of the wealthy are likely to be the concerns of elected politicians even if they are opposed to the interests of the vast majority of the population. That is why we see efforts to cut programs such as Social Security and Medicare even when these cuts are opposed by large majorities of people across the political spectrum.
The news last week is that the new paper discrediting Reinhart and Rogoff made everything much clearer. The leadership of both major parties is not seeking ways to reduce the budget deficit because there is any reason to believe this will be good for the economy. They are looking for ways to reduce the budget deficit because the wealthy are happy to sustain a situation in which high unemployment weakens workers bargaining power. This does not paint a very positive picture of the state of democracy in the United States.
And here we just congratulate people for being the lucky one after playing musical chairs for YEARS. We need to stop competing and DEMAND MORE CHAIRS...
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 724 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What Deficit Reduction is Really About: Weakening Workers’ Bargaining Power (Original Post)
HomerRamone
Apr 2013
OP
byeya
(2,842 posts)1. I think Dean Baker is more cogent than Prof Krugman but he doesn't have the forum the latter
has. His columns are worth seeking out.(I mean no disrespect for Paul Krugman whom I admire.)
HomerRamone
(1,112 posts)2. Paul is reluctant to ascribe evil motives
In today's excellent op-ed The 1 Percents Solution (http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/26/opinion/krugman-the-one-percents-solution.html?_r=0), he says, "Does a continuing depression actually serve the interests of the wealthy? Thats doubtful, since a booming economy is generally good for almost everyone." Dean Baker doesn't pull that last punch...