General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsYou’re On A Terrorist Watch List? Sure, You Can Buy A Gun
http://bluntandcranky.wordpress.com/2013/04/25/youre-on-a-terrorist-watch-list-sure-you-can-buy-a-gun/Snip:"Yes, you read that correctly. If you are on a terrorist watch list, you can pass the current background check and buy a gun from a licensed dealer. Not surprisingly, some people want this changed. Even less surprisingly, the NRA and other Gun Nuts dont.
Yes, you also read that last bit correctly. The Gun Nuts support the rights of terrorists to keep and bear arms. In fact, they managed to kill an amendment last week that would have taken away the ability of terrorists to buy AR-15?s, bulk gunpowder, and other tools of their lethal trade: that trade being, of course, the killing of Americans."
More at the link, including a link to the source (NPR).
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)No problem if you are the author, but some transparency would be nice
riqster
(13,986 posts)I just checked it, and there was nothing in the "about me" section - that has just been remedied. Thanks!
And yes, I am the author.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Paladin
(28,252 posts)friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)Paladin
(28,252 posts)Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)Background checks are only as good as the info in the database.
riqster
(13,986 posts)beevul
(12,194 posts)Bush terrah watchlist applied to gun buyers good?
No thanks.
sarisataka
(18,608 posts)people on the watch list from doing?
Flying- done, let's think of others: voting, receiving government aid, getting a driver's license, receiving social security, buying a cell phone
Things we can do to people on the list to enhance public safety: tap all electronic communications, search their homes whenever we feel the need, bring them in for questioning whenever we want, have the FBI drop in on their friends family and employers to ask if they are doing anything suspicious, whenever we feel it is needed, detain them until it is deemed safe to allow them to go free again.
It may be too much for the FBI. We need a Committee for State Security to aid in protecting the country from people on the terror watch list.
hack89
(39,171 posts)when a secret bureaucratic process rift with errors and the potential for abuse will work just as well?
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)We (as a state) do not infringe constitutional rights without due process.
It's all the fault of this thing..
Damn that 14th amendment.
And that's completely setting aside the accuracy of the list (Remember when Senator Kennedy couldn't get on a plane because there was a 'T.Kennedy' on the 'list'?) And let's ignore the fact that *actual* terrorists don't get put on any list because to do so would alert them that the government is actually aware of and watching them.
justanidea
(291 posts)Denying anyone any constitutional right without due process is wrong.
friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)...or whatever reason du jour they may offer up.
yurbud
(39,405 posts)split the righties with their own inherent contradictions.
The problem is, it would be as likely to make the war on terror look stupid as the gun nuts.
riqster
(13,986 posts)riqster
(13,986 posts)Since you're the only respondent who got the point. If I had written it better, more people would have understood. That's on my to-do-list!
Dr. Strange
(25,920 posts)The Federal Bureau of Investigation is permitted to include people on the governments terrorist watch list even if they have been acquitted of terrorism-related offenses or the charges are dropped, according to newly released documents.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/28/us/even-those-cleared-of-crimes-can-stay-on-fbis-terrorist-watch-list.html?_r=0
petronius
(26,602 posts)to keep the names on the list secret, and a background check rejection would be a clear indicator that a person is being watched. Terrorist organizations could use that as a handy tool to check which of their members had been detected. But for all we know, names from the TSDB might be flagged as they pass through the NICS system, they just don't get denied...
former9thward
(31,984 posts)No link to the supposed amendment. No link to any vote. No link to who was supporting or opposing it.
riqster
(13,986 posts)"More at the link, including a link to the source (NPR)."
Following the link in the OP will show the link (colored text) to NPR:http://www.npr.org/blogs/itsallpolitics/2013/04/24/178668578/people-on-terror-watch-list-not-blocked-from-buying-guns
former9thward
(31,984 posts)There is no link to the amendment, a vote, or who was for or against. Nothing. Just commentary.
krispos42
(49,445 posts)can still vote and speak and pray and marry and have privacy and other rights?